Loading…
Does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulate maturation of tissue-engineered cartilage?
Traumatic events are a primary cause of local lesions of articular cartilage. Tissue engineered, cartilage‐like structures represent an alternative to current treatment methods. The time necessary for tissue maturation and the mechanical quality of the regenerate at implantation are both critical fa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of biomedical materials research 2004-01, Vol.68B (1), p.21-28 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4645-d68cfc7a82c57ba2693c13979d9512bdea573b1395d1071a682856891346d1e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4645-d68cfc7a82c57ba2693c13979d9512bdea573b1395d1071a682856891346d1e3 |
container_end_page | 28 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Journal of biomedical materials research |
container_volume | 68B |
creator | Duda, Georg N. Kliche, Alexander Kleemann, Ralf Hoffmann, Jan E. Sittinger, Michael Haisch, Andreas |
description | Traumatic events are a primary cause of local lesions of articular cartilage. Tissue engineered, cartilage‐like structures represent an alternative to current treatment methods. The time necessary for tissue maturation and the mechanical quality of the regenerate at implantation are both critical factors for clinical success. Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound has proven to accelerate chondrogenesis in vitro. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound is capable of accelerating the process of cartilage maturation and increasing regenerate stability. Hyaline‐like cartilage specimens were generated in vitro and subcutaneously implanted in the backs of nude mice. Twenty‐eight animals received 20 min of low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment daily, and 28 animals received a sham treatment. Specimens were explanted after 1, 3, 6, and 12 weeks, mechanically tested with the use of an indentation test, histologically examined, and processed for RT‐PCR. The Young's moduli significantly increased from 3 to 12 weeks, and at 6 weeks were comparable to those of native articular cartilage. In histological examination, specimens showed neocartilage formation. There was no significant difference between ultrasound‐treated and sham‐treated groups. The mechanical stability of the neocartilage specimens increased with treatment time and reached values of native cartilage after 6 weeks in vivo. Low‐intensity pulsed‐ultrasound stimulation showed no stimulatory effect on tissue maturation. In contrast, ultrasound‐treated specimens showed a reduced Col 2 expression at 1 week and were significantly less stiff compared to native cartilage at 6 and 12 weeks. An acceleration of the maturation of tissue‐engineered neocartilage in a clinical setting by means of low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound therefore appears rather unrealistic. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 68B: 21–28, 2004 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm.b.10075 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80065964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19213662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4645-d68cfc7a82c57ba2693c13979d9512bdea573b1395d1071a682856891346d1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1PGzEQhq0KVCDtiTvaE5dqqcdee9enqqQkKYK2ByTUk-XdnSDT_Qj-EOTfY0igNzjNaPS8j0Z6CTkEegKUsq-3dX9SP62l-ED2QQiWF6qCnde95HvkwPvbBEsq-EeyB4WsVKHYPvn7Y0SfdeN9boeAg7dhna1i57HNYhec8WMc2swH28fOBMx6E6IzwY5DNi6zYL2PmONwYwdEl0KNccF25ga_fSK7S5NEn7dzQq5mZ1fTRX7xe_5z-v0ibwpZiLyVVbNsSlOxRpS1YVLxBrgqVasEsLpFI0pep4togZZgZMUqkb4HXsgWkE_I8Ua7cuNdRB90b32DXWcGHKPXFaVSKFm8CzIqJOMg3gVBMeAysRPyZQM2bvTe4VKvnO2NW2ug-qkanarRtX6uJtFHW22se2z_s9suEgAb4N52uH7Lpc9PL1-k-SZjfcCH14xx_7QseSKvf801LGBxPfujdMUfAVtTqIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19213662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulate maturation of tissue-engineered cartilage?</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Duda, Georg N. ; Kliche, Alexander ; Kleemann, Ralf ; Hoffmann, Jan E. ; Sittinger, Michael ; Haisch, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Duda, Georg N. ; Kliche, Alexander ; Kleemann, Ralf ; Hoffmann, Jan E. ; Sittinger, Michael ; Haisch, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Traumatic events are a primary cause of local lesions of articular cartilage. Tissue engineered, cartilage‐like structures represent an alternative to current treatment methods. The time necessary for tissue maturation and the mechanical quality of the regenerate at implantation are both critical factors for clinical success. Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound has proven to accelerate chondrogenesis in vitro. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound is capable of accelerating the process of cartilage maturation and increasing regenerate stability. Hyaline‐like cartilage specimens were generated in vitro and subcutaneously implanted in the backs of nude mice. Twenty‐eight animals received 20 min of low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment daily, and 28 animals received a sham treatment. Specimens were explanted after 1, 3, 6, and 12 weeks, mechanically tested with the use of an indentation test, histologically examined, and processed for RT‐PCR. The Young's moduli significantly increased from 3 to 12 weeks, and at 6 weeks were comparable to those of native articular cartilage. In histological examination, specimens showed neocartilage formation. There was no significant difference between ultrasound‐treated and sham‐treated groups. The mechanical stability of the neocartilage specimens increased with treatment time and reached values of native cartilage after 6 weeks in vivo. Low‐intensity pulsed‐ultrasound stimulation showed no stimulatory effect on tissue maturation. In contrast, ultrasound‐treated specimens showed a reduced Col 2 expression at 1 week and were significantly less stiff compared to native cartilage at 6 and 12 weeks. An acceleration of the maturation of tissue‐engineered neocartilage in a clinical setting by means of low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound therefore appears rather unrealistic. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 68B: 21–28, 2004</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4973</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.10075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14689492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Cartilage - diagnostic imaging ; Cartilage - growth & development ; Cartilage - physiology ; cartilage engineering ; cartilage mechanics ; Radiography ; Tissue Engineering ; tissue maturation ; Ultrasonics ; ultrasound treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research, 2004-01, Vol.68B (1), p.21-28</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4645-d68cfc7a82c57ba2693c13979d9512bdea573b1395d1071a682856891346d1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4645-d68cfc7a82c57ba2693c13979d9512bdea573b1395d1071a682856891346d1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14689492$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duda, Georg N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kliche, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleemann, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Jan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sittinger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haisch, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulate maturation of tissue-engineered cartilage?</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>Traumatic events are a primary cause of local lesions of articular cartilage. Tissue engineered, cartilage‐like structures represent an alternative to current treatment methods. The time necessary for tissue maturation and the mechanical quality of the regenerate at implantation are both critical factors for clinical success. Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound has proven to accelerate chondrogenesis in vitro. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound is capable of accelerating the process of cartilage maturation and increasing regenerate stability. Hyaline‐like cartilage specimens were generated in vitro and subcutaneously implanted in the backs of nude mice. Twenty‐eight animals received 20 min of low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment daily, and 28 animals received a sham treatment. Specimens were explanted after 1, 3, 6, and 12 weeks, mechanically tested with the use of an indentation test, histologically examined, and processed for RT‐PCR. The Young's moduli significantly increased from 3 to 12 weeks, and at 6 weeks were comparable to those of native articular cartilage. In histological examination, specimens showed neocartilage formation. There was no significant difference between ultrasound‐treated and sham‐treated groups. The mechanical stability of the neocartilage specimens increased with treatment time and reached values of native cartilage after 6 weeks in vivo. Low‐intensity pulsed‐ultrasound stimulation showed no stimulatory effect on tissue maturation. In contrast, ultrasound‐treated specimens showed a reduced Col 2 expression at 1 week and were significantly less stiff compared to native cartilage at 6 and 12 weeks. An acceleration of the maturation of tissue‐engineered neocartilage in a clinical setting by means of low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound therefore appears rather unrealistic. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 68B: 21–28, 2004</description><subject>Cartilage - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cartilage - growth & development</subject><subject>Cartilage - physiology</subject><subject>cartilage engineering</subject><subject>cartilage mechanics</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering</subject><subject>tissue maturation</subject><subject>Ultrasonics</subject><subject>ultrasound treatment</subject><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>0021-9304</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1PGzEQhq0KVCDtiTvaE5dqqcdee9enqqQkKYK2ByTUk-XdnSDT_Qj-EOTfY0igNzjNaPS8j0Z6CTkEegKUsq-3dX9SP62l-ED2QQiWF6qCnde95HvkwPvbBEsq-EeyB4WsVKHYPvn7Y0SfdeN9boeAg7dhna1i57HNYhec8WMc2swH28fOBMx6E6IzwY5DNi6zYL2PmONwYwdEl0KNccF25ga_fSK7S5NEn7dzQq5mZ1fTRX7xe_5z-v0ibwpZiLyVVbNsSlOxRpS1YVLxBrgqVasEsLpFI0pep4togZZgZMUqkb4HXsgWkE_I8Ua7cuNdRB90b32DXWcGHKPXFaVSKFm8CzIqJOMg3gVBMeAysRPyZQM2bvTe4VKvnO2NW2ug-qkanarRtX6uJtFHW22se2z_s9suEgAb4N52uH7Lpc9PL1-k-SZjfcCH14xx_7QseSKvf801LGBxPfujdMUfAVtTqIg</recordid><startdate>20040115</startdate><enddate>20040115</enddate><creator>Duda, Georg N.</creator><creator>Kliche, Alexander</creator><creator>Kleemann, Ralf</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Jan E.</creator><creator>Sittinger, Michael</creator><creator>Haisch, Andreas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040115</creationdate><title>Does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulate maturation of tissue-engineered cartilage?</title><author>Duda, Georg N. ; Kliche, Alexander ; Kleemann, Ralf ; Hoffmann, Jan E. ; Sittinger, Michael ; Haisch, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4645-d68cfc7a82c57ba2693c13979d9512bdea573b1395d1071a682856891346d1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Cartilage - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cartilage - growth & development</topic><topic>Cartilage - physiology</topic><topic>cartilage engineering</topic><topic>cartilage mechanics</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering</topic><topic>tissue maturation</topic><topic>Ultrasonics</topic><topic>ultrasound treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duda, Georg N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kliche, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleemann, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Jan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sittinger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haisch, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duda, Georg N.</au><au>Kliche, Alexander</au><au>Kleemann, Ralf</au><au>Hoffmann, Jan E.</au><au>Sittinger, Michael</au><au>Haisch, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulate maturation of tissue-engineered cartilage?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2004-01-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>68B</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>21-28</pages><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>0021-9304</issn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>Traumatic events are a primary cause of local lesions of articular cartilage. Tissue engineered, cartilage‐like structures represent an alternative to current treatment methods. The time necessary for tissue maturation and the mechanical quality of the regenerate at implantation are both critical factors for clinical success. Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound has proven to accelerate chondrogenesis in vitro. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound is capable of accelerating the process of cartilage maturation and increasing regenerate stability. Hyaline‐like cartilage specimens were generated in vitro and subcutaneously implanted in the backs of nude mice. Twenty‐eight animals received 20 min of low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment daily, and 28 animals received a sham treatment. Specimens were explanted after 1, 3, 6, and 12 weeks, mechanically tested with the use of an indentation test, histologically examined, and processed for RT‐PCR. The Young's moduli significantly increased from 3 to 12 weeks, and at 6 weeks were comparable to those of native articular cartilage. In histological examination, specimens showed neocartilage formation. There was no significant difference between ultrasound‐treated and sham‐treated groups. The mechanical stability of the neocartilage specimens increased with treatment time and reached values of native cartilage after 6 weeks in vivo. Low‐intensity pulsed‐ultrasound stimulation showed no stimulatory effect on tissue maturation. In contrast, ultrasound‐treated specimens showed a reduced Col 2 expression at 1 week and were significantly less stiff compared to native cartilage at 6 and 12 weeks. An acceleration of the maturation of tissue‐engineered neocartilage in a clinical setting by means of low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound therefore appears rather unrealistic. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 68B: 21–28, 2004</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>14689492</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.10075</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1552-4973 |
ispartof | Journal of biomedical materials research, 2004-01, Vol.68B (1), p.21-28 |
issn | 1552-4973 0021-9304 1552-4981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80065964 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Cartilage - diagnostic imaging Cartilage - growth & development Cartilage - physiology cartilage engineering cartilage mechanics Radiography Tissue Engineering tissue maturation Ultrasonics ultrasound treatment |
title | Does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulate maturation of tissue-engineered cartilage? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A55%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20low-intensity%20pulsed%20ultrasound%20stimulate%20maturation%20of%20tissue-engineered%20cartilage?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research&rft.au=Duda,%20Georg%20N.&rft.date=2004-01-15&rft.volume=68B&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=21-28&rft.issn=1552-4973&rft.eissn=1552-4981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.b.10075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19213662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4645-d68cfc7a82c57ba2693c13979d9512bdea573b1395d1071a682856891346d1e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19213662&rft_id=info:pmid/14689492&rfr_iscdi=true |