Loading…

Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning

We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate corte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) N.Y. 1991), 2004-02, Vol.14 (2), p.199-208
Main Authors: Aizenstein, Howard J., Stenger, V. Andrew, Cochran, Jennifer, Clark, Kristi, Johnson, Melissa, Nebes, Robert D., Carter, Cameron S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3
cites
container_end_page 208
container_issue 2
container_start_page 199
container_title Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)
container_volume 14
creator Aizenstein, Howard J.
Stenger, V. Andrew
Cochran, Jennifer
Clark, Kristi
Johnson, Melissa
Nebes, Robert D.
Carter, Cameron S.
description We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and visual regions (V1, V2 and V3) were engaged during both ESL and ISL. With ESL there was increased activity in the visual regions on the predictable (i.e. learned pattern) trials. With ISL, however, there was a relative decrease in activity in visual regions. The opposite patterns in the visual regions highlight the different effects of ESL and ISL. The learning process was distinguished from the result of learning, by fitting subjects’ functional magnetic resonance imaging data to their learning curve. This analysis revealed more extensive PFC activity during ESL and caudal ACC activity specific for the result of learning analysis, when the expected response was violated. Our results suggest a relative dissociation of the brain regions engaged during ESL and ISL, whereby ESL and ISL can be viewed as partially distinct but overlapping parallel processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cercor/bhg119
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80087825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>526481501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9LwzAUx4Mo_j56leLBWzVJm6Q56tBtMBCcingJafo6M7t0Jq3of29kw4EXT-_X5315vC9CJwRfECyzSwPetP6yfJ0RIrfQPsk5TimRcjvmOBdpRgnZQwchzDEmgjK6i_ZILnBOidhH03uY2dbpJrn22rrkynT2Q3exlVS9t26WDFpneu_Bdcl4sWyssV2iXZXcfK6LKbz34AwkE9DexZUjtFPrJsDxOh6ix9ubh8EondwNx4OrSWoYkV1KoRaC5pLqWjJWypqXFGgFjOs6LxmuS8kBc4F5QWUlBKMV56UBZrCsBTbZITpf6S59G08InVrYYKBptIO2D6rAuBAFZf-CRFLOiyyL4NkfcN72Pn7nhymKXHDJI5SuIOPbEDzUauntQvsvRbD68UStPFErTyJ_uhbtywVUG3ptwkbQhg4-f-favykuMsHU6PlFTSfDp0EexYfZNwecmEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198847696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Aizenstein, Howard J. ; Stenger, V. Andrew ; Cochran, Jennifer ; Clark, Kristi ; Johnson, Melissa ; Nebes, Robert D. ; Carter, Cameron S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aizenstein, Howard J. ; Stenger, V. Andrew ; Cochran, Jennifer ; Clark, Kristi ; Johnson, Melissa ; Nebes, Robert D. ; Carter, Cameron S.</creatorcontrib><description>We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and visual regions (V1, V2 and V3) were engaged during both ESL and ISL. With ESL there was increased activity in the visual regions on the predictable (i.e. learned pattern) trials. With ISL, however, there was a relative decrease in activity in visual regions. The opposite patterns in the visual regions highlight the different effects of ESL and ISL. The learning process was distinguished from the result of learning, by fitting subjects’ functional magnetic resonance imaging data to their learning curve. This analysis revealed more extensive PFC activity during ESL and caudal ACC activity specific for the result of learning analysis, when the expected response was violated. Our results suggest a relative dissociation of the brain regions engaged during ESL and ISL, whereby ESL and ISL can be viewed as partially distinct but overlapping parallel processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-3211</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2199</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhg119</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14704217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; explicit learning ; Female ; fMRI ; Humans ; implicit learning ; Learning - physiology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Monte Carlo Method ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Reaction Time - physiology ; sequence learning ; Serial Learning - physiology</subject><ispartof>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2004-02, Vol.14 (2), p.199-208</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Feb 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14704217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aizenstein, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenger, V. Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nebes, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Cameron S.</creatorcontrib><title>Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning</title><title>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</title><addtitle>Cereb. Cortex</addtitle><description>We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and visual regions (V1, V2 and V3) were engaged during both ESL and ISL. With ESL there was increased activity in the visual regions on the predictable (i.e. learned pattern) trials. With ISL, however, there was a relative decrease in activity in visual regions. The opposite patterns in the visual regions highlight the different effects of ESL and ISL. The learning process was distinguished from the result of learning, by fitting subjects’ functional magnetic resonance imaging data to their learning curve. This analysis revealed more extensive PFC activity during ESL and caudal ACC activity specific for the result of learning analysis, when the expected response was violated. Our results suggest a relative dissociation of the brain regions engaged during ESL and ISL, whereby ESL and ISL can be viewed as partially distinct but overlapping parallel processes.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>explicit learning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implicit learning</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>sequence learning</subject><subject>Serial Learning - physiology</subject><issn>1047-3211</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9LwzAUx4Mo_j56leLBWzVJm6Q56tBtMBCcingJafo6M7t0Jq3of29kw4EXT-_X5315vC9CJwRfECyzSwPetP6yfJ0RIrfQPsk5TimRcjvmOBdpRgnZQwchzDEmgjK6i_ZILnBOidhH03uY2dbpJrn22rrkynT2Q3exlVS9t26WDFpneu_Bdcl4sWyssV2iXZXcfK6LKbz34AwkE9DexZUjtFPrJsDxOh6ix9ubh8EondwNx4OrSWoYkV1KoRaC5pLqWjJWypqXFGgFjOs6LxmuS8kBc4F5QWUlBKMV56UBZrCsBTbZITpf6S59G08InVrYYKBptIO2D6rAuBAFZf-CRFLOiyyL4NkfcN72Pn7nhymKXHDJI5SuIOPbEDzUauntQvsvRbD68UStPFErTyJ_uhbtywVUG3ptwkbQhg4-f-favykuMsHU6PlFTSfDp0EexYfZNwecmEw</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Aizenstein, Howard J.</creator><creator>Stenger, V. Andrew</creator><creator>Cochran, Jennifer</creator><creator>Clark, Kristi</creator><creator>Johnson, Melissa</creator><creator>Nebes, Robert D.</creator><creator>Carter, Cameron S.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning</title><author>Aizenstein, Howard J. ; Stenger, V. Andrew ; Cochran, Jennifer ; Clark, Kristi ; Johnson, Melissa ; Nebes, Robert D. ; Carter, Cameron S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>explicit learning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implicit learning</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>sequence learning</topic><topic>Serial Learning - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aizenstein, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenger, V. Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nebes, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Cameron S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aizenstein, Howard J.</au><au>Stenger, V. Andrew</au><au>Cochran, Jennifer</au><au>Clark, Kristi</au><au>Johnson, Melissa</au><au>Nebes, Robert D.</au><au>Carter, Cameron S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning</atitle><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle><addtitle>Cereb. Cortex</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>199-208</pages><issn>1047-3211</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><eissn>1460-2199</eissn><abstract>We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and visual regions (V1, V2 and V3) were engaged during both ESL and ISL. With ESL there was increased activity in the visual regions on the predictable (i.e. learned pattern) trials. With ISL, however, there was a relative decrease in activity in visual regions. The opposite patterns in the visual regions highlight the different effects of ESL and ISL. The learning process was distinguished from the result of learning, by fitting subjects’ functional magnetic resonance imaging data to their learning curve. This analysis revealed more extensive PFC activity during ESL and caudal ACC activity specific for the result of learning analysis, when the expected response was violated. Our results suggest a relative dissociation of the brain regions engaged during ESL and ISL, whereby ESL and ISL can be viewed as partially distinct but overlapping parallel processes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>14704217</pmid><doi>10.1093/cercor/bhg119</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-3211
ispartof Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2004-02, Vol.14 (2), p.199-208
issn 1047-3211
1460-2199
1460-2199
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80087825
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping - methods
explicit learning
Female
fMRI
Humans
implicit learning
Learning - physiology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Monte Carlo Method
Photic Stimulation - methods
Reaction Time - physiology
sequence learning
Serial Learning - physiology
title Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A53%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20Brain%20Activation%20during%20Concurrent%20Implicit%20and%20Explicit%20Sequence%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Cerebral%20cortex%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201991)&rft.au=Aizenstein,%20Howard%20J.&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=199-208&rft.issn=1047-3211&rft.eissn=1460-2199&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cercor/bhg119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E526481501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198847696&rft_id=info:pmid/14704217&rfr_iscdi=true