Loading…
Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning
We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate corte...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) N.Y. 1991), 2004-02, Vol.14 (2), p.199-208 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 208 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Aizenstein, Howard J. Stenger, V. Andrew Cochran, Jennifer Clark, Kristi Johnson, Melissa Nebes, Robert D. Carter, Cameron S. |
description | We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and visual regions (V1, V2 and V3) were engaged during both ESL and ISL. With ESL there was increased activity in the visual regions on the predictable (i.e. learned pattern) trials. With ISL, however, there was a relative decrease in activity in visual regions. The opposite patterns in the visual regions highlight the different effects of ESL and ISL. The learning process was distinguished from the result of learning, by fitting subjects’ functional magnetic resonance imaging data to their learning curve. This analysis revealed more extensive PFC activity during ESL and caudal ACC activity specific for the result of learning analysis, when the expected response was violated. Our results suggest a relative dissociation of the brain regions engaged during ESL and ISL, whereby ESL and ISL can be viewed as partially distinct but overlapping parallel processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cercor/bhg119 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80087825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>526481501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9LwzAUx4Mo_j56leLBWzVJm6Q56tBtMBCcingJafo6M7t0Jq3of29kw4EXT-_X5315vC9CJwRfECyzSwPetP6yfJ0RIrfQPsk5TimRcjvmOBdpRgnZQwchzDEmgjK6i_ZILnBOidhH03uY2dbpJrn22rrkynT2Q3exlVS9t26WDFpneu_Bdcl4sWyssV2iXZXcfK6LKbz34AwkE9DexZUjtFPrJsDxOh6ix9ubh8EondwNx4OrSWoYkV1KoRaC5pLqWjJWypqXFGgFjOs6LxmuS8kBc4F5QWUlBKMV56UBZrCsBTbZITpf6S59G08InVrYYKBptIO2D6rAuBAFZf-CRFLOiyyL4NkfcN72Pn7nhymKXHDJI5SuIOPbEDzUauntQvsvRbD68UStPFErTyJ_uhbtywVUG3ptwkbQhg4-f-favykuMsHU6PlFTSfDp0EexYfZNwecmEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198847696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Aizenstein, Howard J. ; Stenger, V. Andrew ; Cochran, Jennifer ; Clark, Kristi ; Johnson, Melissa ; Nebes, Robert D. ; Carter, Cameron S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aizenstein, Howard J. ; Stenger, V. Andrew ; Cochran, Jennifer ; Clark, Kristi ; Johnson, Melissa ; Nebes, Robert D. ; Carter, Cameron S.</creatorcontrib><description>We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and visual regions (V1, V2 and V3) were engaged during both ESL and ISL. With ESL there was increased activity in the visual regions on the predictable (i.e. learned pattern) trials. With ISL, however, there was a relative decrease in activity in visual regions. The opposite patterns in the visual regions highlight the different effects of ESL and ISL. The learning process was distinguished from the result of learning, by fitting subjects’ functional magnetic resonance imaging data to their learning curve. This analysis revealed more extensive PFC activity during ESL and caudal ACC activity specific for the result of learning analysis, when the expected response was violated. Our results suggest a relative dissociation of the brain regions engaged during ESL and ISL, whereby ESL and ISL can be viewed as partially distinct but overlapping parallel processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-3211</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2199</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhg119</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14704217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; explicit learning ; Female ; fMRI ; Humans ; implicit learning ; Learning - physiology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Monte Carlo Method ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Reaction Time - physiology ; sequence learning ; Serial Learning - physiology</subject><ispartof>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2004-02, Vol.14 (2), p.199-208</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Feb 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14704217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aizenstein, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenger, V. Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nebes, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Cameron S.</creatorcontrib><title>Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning</title><title>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</title><addtitle>Cereb. Cortex</addtitle><description>We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and visual regions (V1, V2 and V3) were engaged during both ESL and ISL. With ESL there was increased activity in the visual regions on the predictable (i.e. learned pattern) trials. With ISL, however, there was a relative decrease in activity in visual regions. The opposite patterns in the visual regions highlight the different effects of ESL and ISL. The learning process was distinguished from the result of learning, by fitting subjects’ functional magnetic resonance imaging data to their learning curve. This analysis revealed more extensive PFC activity during ESL and caudal ACC activity specific for the result of learning analysis, when the expected response was violated. Our results suggest a relative dissociation of the brain regions engaged during ESL and ISL, whereby ESL and ISL can be viewed as partially distinct but overlapping parallel processes.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>explicit learning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implicit learning</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>sequence learning</subject><subject>Serial Learning - physiology</subject><issn>1047-3211</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9LwzAUx4Mo_j56leLBWzVJm6Q56tBtMBCcingJafo6M7t0Jq3of29kw4EXT-_X5315vC9CJwRfECyzSwPetP6yfJ0RIrfQPsk5TimRcjvmOBdpRgnZQwchzDEmgjK6i_ZILnBOidhH03uY2dbpJrn22rrkynT2Q3exlVS9t26WDFpneu_Bdcl4sWyssV2iXZXcfK6LKbz34AwkE9DexZUjtFPrJsDxOh6ix9ubh8EondwNx4OrSWoYkV1KoRaC5pLqWjJWypqXFGgFjOs6LxmuS8kBc4F5QWUlBKMV56UBZrCsBTbZITpf6S59G08InVrYYKBptIO2D6rAuBAFZf-CRFLOiyyL4NkfcN72Pn7nhymKXHDJI5SuIOPbEDzUauntQvsvRbD68UStPFErTyJ_uhbtywVUG3ptwkbQhg4-f-favykuMsHU6PlFTSfDp0EexYfZNwecmEw</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Aizenstein, Howard J.</creator><creator>Stenger, V. Andrew</creator><creator>Cochran, Jennifer</creator><creator>Clark, Kristi</creator><creator>Johnson, Melissa</creator><creator>Nebes, Robert D.</creator><creator>Carter, Cameron S.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning</title><author>Aizenstein, Howard J. ; Stenger, V. Andrew ; Cochran, Jennifer ; Clark, Kristi ; Johnson, Melissa ; Nebes, Robert D. ; Carter, Cameron S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>explicit learning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implicit learning</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>sequence learning</topic><topic>Serial Learning - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aizenstein, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenger, V. Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Kristi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nebes, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Cameron S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aizenstein, Howard J.</au><au>Stenger, V. Andrew</au><au>Cochran, Jennifer</au><au>Clark, Kristi</au><au>Johnson, Melissa</au><au>Nebes, Robert D.</au><au>Carter, Cameron S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning</atitle><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle><addtitle>Cereb. Cortex</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>199-208</pages><issn>1047-3211</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><eissn>1460-2199</eissn><abstract>We used event-related fMRI to identify the brain regions engaged during explicit and implicit sequence learning (ESL and ISL, respectively). Twenty-four subjects performed a concurrent ESL and ISL task. Behavior showed learning in both conditions. Prefrontal (PFC), striatal, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and visual regions (V1, V2 and V3) were engaged during both ESL and ISL. With ESL there was increased activity in the visual regions on the predictable (i.e. learned pattern) trials. With ISL, however, there was a relative decrease in activity in visual regions. The opposite patterns in the visual regions highlight the different effects of ESL and ISL. The learning process was distinguished from the result of learning, by fitting subjects’ functional magnetic resonance imaging data to their learning curve. This analysis revealed more extensive PFC activity during ESL and caudal ACC activity specific for the result of learning analysis, when the expected response was violated. Our results suggest a relative dissociation of the brain regions engaged during ESL and ISL, whereby ESL and ISL can be viewed as partially distinct but overlapping parallel processes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>14704217</pmid><doi>10.1093/cercor/bhg119</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1047-3211 |
ispartof | Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2004-02, Vol.14 (2), p.199-208 |
issn | 1047-3211 1460-2199 1460-2199 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80087825 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Brain - physiology Brain Mapping - methods explicit learning Female fMRI Humans implicit learning Learning - physiology Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Monte Carlo Method Photic Stimulation - methods Reaction Time - physiology sequence learning Serial Learning - physiology |
title | Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A53%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20Brain%20Activation%20during%20Concurrent%20Implicit%20and%20Explicit%20Sequence%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Cerebral%20cortex%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201991)&rft.au=Aizenstein,%20Howard%20J.&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=199-208&rft.issn=1047-3211&rft.eissn=1460-2199&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cercor/bhg119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E526481501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-2ef772492af955b9f6b2e2de56af4b50fb96e06706829d7752d66bce5c09f70c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198847696&rft_id=info:pmid/14704217&rfr_iscdi=true |