Loading…

Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after spinal cord injury

Retrospective. To predict satisfaction with medical rehabilitation. While spinal cord injury (SCI) patient satisfaction with life and community services has been investigated, satisfaction with medical rehabilitation has not. Information submitted to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2004-01, Vol.29 (2), p.211-219
Main Authors: TOOTH, Leigh R, OTTENBACHER, Kenneth J, SMITH, Pamela M, ILLIG, Sandra B, LINN, Richard T, GRANGER, Carl V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8031bdc53f4d90179048188abfcffab4b673d0bef2a75ee89f3b0e2d327325e63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8031bdc53f4d90179048188abfcffab4b673d0bef2a75ee89f3b0e2d327325e63
container_end_page 219
container_issue 2
container_start_page 211
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 29
creator TOOTH, Leigh R
OTTENBACHER, Kenneth J
SMITH, Pamela M
ILLIG, Sandra B
LINN, Richard T
GRANGER, Carl V
description Retrospective. To predict satisfaction with medical rehabilitation. While spinal cord injury (SCI) patient satisfaction with life and community services has been investigated, satisfaction with medical rehabilitation has not. Information submitted to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (1998-2001) by 134 hospitals/rehabilitation facilities in the United States (n = 6,205 patients with SCI) was examined. Predictors were sociodemographic variables, Case Mix Groupings (CMG) (401-505, 5001), length of stay, rehospitalization, follow-up therapy, and health maintenance. Satisfaction was assessed at a mean of 92.2 days (SD 11.9 days) postdischarge. Data were analyzed according to who reported the outcome (patient, n = 3,858 or family/other, n = 1,869). Statistical modeling was conducted using logistic regression. High overall satisfaction was reported (94%). Significant predictors for the patient report data were CMG and rehospitalization. Compared with CMG 5001 (short stay,
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.BRS.0000107236.74004.31
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80096207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80096207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8031bdc53f4d90179048188abfcffab4b673d0bef2a75ee89f3b0e2d327325e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_ghRB71rPSdKm9U6HXzAQnF6HNE1YRtfOpEP2743bYOfmXLzPew48hNwgZAiVuAfMnj7nGcRBEJQVmeAAPGN4QsaY0zJFzKtTMgZW0JRyVozIRQjLyBcMq3MyQi4o5SjG5HGuBhes0oPru-TXDYtkZRqnVZt4s1C1a92gdpmyg_FJWLsuZrr3TeK65cZvL8mZVW0wV4c9Id8vz1_Tt3T28fo-fZylmgk-pCUwrBudM8ubClBUwEssS1Vbba2qeV0I1kBtLFUiN6asLKvB0IZRwWhuCjYhd_u7a9__bEwY5MoFbdpWdabfBFkCVAUFEcGHPah9H4I3Vq69Wym_lQjyX6AElFGgPAqUO4GSYSxfH75s6ijiWD0Yi8DtAVAhWrJeddqFI5fnJQgu2B8mrnmf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80096207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after spinal cord injury</title><source>LWW_医学期刊</source><creator>TOOTH, Leigh R ; OTTENBACHER, Kenneth J ; SMITH, Pamela M ; ILLIG, Sandra B ; LINN, Richard T ; GRANGER, Carl V</creator><creatorcontrib>TOOTH, Leigh R ; OTTENBACHER, Kenneth J ; SMITH, Pamela M ; ILLIG, Sandra B ; LINN, Richard T ; GRANGER, Carl V</creatorcontrib><description>Retrospective. To predict satisfaction with medical rehabilitation. While spinal cord injury (SCI) patient satisfaction with life and community services has been investigated, satisfaction with medical rehabilitation has not. Information submitted to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (1998-2001) by 134 hospitals/rehabilitation facilities in the United States (n = 6,205 patients with SCI) was examined. Predictors were sociodemographic variables, Case Mix Groupings (CMG) (401-505, 5001), length of stay, rehospitalization, follow-up therapy, and health maintenance. Satisfaction was assessed at a mean of 92.2 days (SD 11.9 days) postdischarge. Data were analyzed according to who reported the outcome (patient, n = 3,858 or family/other, n = 1,869). Statistical modeling was conducted using logistic regression. High overall satisfaction was reported (94%). Significant predictors for the patient report data were CMG and rehospitalization. Compared with CMG 5001 (short stay, &lt;3 days), patients in CMGs 401/2/3 and 501/2/3/4/5 had a 54% to 74% lower likelihood of being dissatisfied. Rehospitalized patients had a higher likelihood of dissatisfaction (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.2). Significant predictors for the family/other report data were CMG (compared to CMG 5001, CMGs 401/2, 403, and 501/2 had a 70% lower likelihood of dissatisfaction), rehospitalization (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.5), and marital status (married = 50% lower likelihood of dissatisfaction, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.96). Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation services following SCI is related to functional abilities, rehospitalization, and marital status. Slightly different results were found for whether satisfaction was rated by the patient or family/other. The complex relationships among satisfaction, patient demographics, and functional status require continued examination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000107236.74004.31</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14722417</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord ; Demography ; Diagnosis-Related Groups - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Marital Status ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Rehabilitation Centers - standards ; Spinal Cord Injuries - classification ; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation ; United States</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2004-01, Vol.29 (2), p.211-219</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8031bdc53f4d90179048188abfcffab4b673d0bef2a75ee89f3b0e2d327325e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8031bdc53f4d90179048188abfcffab4b673d0bef2a75ee89f3b0e2d327325e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15580747$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14722417$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TOOTH, Leigh R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OTTENBACHER, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, Pamela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ILLIG, Sandra B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LINN, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRANGER, Carl V</creatorcontrib><title>Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after spinal cord injury</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Retrospective. To predict satisfaction with medical rehabilitation. While spinal cord injury (SCI) patient satisfaction with life and community services has been investigated, satisfaction with medical rehabilitation has not. Information submitted to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (1998-2001) by 134 hospitals/rehabilitation facilities in the United States (n = 6,205 patients with SCI) was examined. Predictors were sociodemographic variables, Case Mix Groupings (CMG) (401-505, 5001), length of stay, rehospitalization, follow-up therapy, and health maintenance. Satisfaction was assessed at a mean of 92.2 days (SD 11.9 days) postdischarge. Data were analyzed according to who reported the outcome (patient, n = 3,858 or family/other, n = 1,869). Statistical modeling was conducted using logistic regression. High overall satisfaction was reported (94%). Significant predictors for the patient report data were CMG and rehospitalization. Compared with CMG 5001 (short stay, &lt;3 days), patients in CMGs 401/2/3 and 501/2/3/4/5 had a 54% to 74% lower likelihood of being dissatisfied. Rehospitalized patients had a higher likelihood of dissatisfaction (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.2). Significant predictors for the family/other report data were CMG (compared to CMG 5001, CMGs 401/2, 403, and 501/2 had a 70% lower likelihood of dissatisfaction), rehospitalization (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.5), and marital status (married = 50% lower likelihood of dissatisfaction, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.96). Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation services following SCI is related to functional abilities, rehospitalization, and marital status. Slightly different results were found for whether satisfaction was rated by the patient or family/other. The complex relationships among satisfaction, patient demographics, and functional status require continued examination.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diagnosis-Related Groups - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marital Status</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Centers - standards</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - classification</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_ghRB71rPSdKm9U6HXzAQnF6HNE1YRtfOpEP2743bYOfmXLzPew48hNwgZAiVuAfMnj7nGcRBEJQVmeAAPGN4QsaY0zJFzKtTMgZW0JRyVozIRQjLyBcMq3MyQi4o5SjG5HGuBhes0oPru-TXDYtkZRqnVZt4s1C1a92gdpmyg_FJWLsuZrr3TeK65cZvL8mZVW0wV4c9Id8vz1_Tt3T28fo-fZylmgk-pCUwrBudM8ubClBUwEssS1Vbba2qeV0I1kBtLFUiN6asLKvB0IZRwWhuCjYhd_u7a9__bEwY5MoFbdpWdabfBFkCVAUFEcGHPah9H4I3Vq69Wym_lQjyX6AElFGgPAqUO4GSYSxfH75s6ijiWD0Yi8DtAVAhWrJeddqFI5fnJQgu2B8mrnmf</recordid><startdate>20040115</startdate><enddate>20040115</enddate><creator>TOOTH, Leigh R</creator><creator>OTTENBACHER, Kenneth J</creator><creator>SMITH, Pamela M</creator><creator>ILLIG, Sandra B</creator><creator>LINN, Richard T</creator><creator>GRANGER, Carl V</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040115</creationdate><title>Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after spinal cord injury</title><author>TOOTH, Leigh R ; OTTENBACHER, Kenneth J ; SMITH, Pamela M ; ILLIG, Sandra B ; LINN, Richard T ; GRANGER, Carl V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8031bdc53f4d90179048188abfcffab4b673d0bef2a75ee89f3b0e2d327325e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diagnosis-Related Groups - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marital Status</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Centers - standards</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - classification</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TOOTH, Leigh R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OTTENBACHER, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, Pamela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ILLIG, Sandra B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LINN, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRANGER, Carl V</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TOOTH, Leigh R</au><au>OTTENBACHER, Kenneth J</au><au>SMITH, Pamela M</au><au>ILLIG, Sandra B</au><au>LINN, Richard T</au><au>GRANGER, Carl V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after spinal cord injury</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2004-01-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>219</epage><pages>211-219</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>Retrospective. To predict satisfaction with medical rehabilitation. While spinal cord injury (SCI) patient satisfaction with life and community services has been investigated, satisfaction with medical rehabilitation has not. Information submitted to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (1998-2001) by 134 hospitals/rehabilitation facilities in the United States (n = 6,205 patients with SCI) was examined. Predictors were sociodemographic variables, Case Mix Groupings (CMG) (401-505, 5001), length of stay, rehospitalization, follow-up therapy, and health maintenance. Satisfaction was assessed at a mean of 92.2 days (SD 11.9 days) postdischarge. Data were analyzed according to who reported the outcome (patient, n = 3,858 or family/other, n = 1,869). Statistical modeling was conducted using logistic regression. High overall satisfaction was reported (94%). Significant predictors for the patient report data were CMG and rehospitalization. Compared with CMG 5001 (short stay, &lt;3 days), patients in CMGs 401/2/3 and 501/2/3/4/5 had a 54% to 74% lower likelihood of being dissatisfied. Rehospitalized patients had a higher likelihood of dissatisfaction (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.2). Significant predictors for the family/other report data were CMG (compared to CMG 5001, CMGs 401/2, 403, and 501/2 had a 70% lower likelihood of dissatisfaction), rehospitalization (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.5), and marital status (married = 50% lower likelihood of dissatisfaction, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.96). Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation services following SCI is related to functional abilities, rehospitalization, and marital status. Slightly different results were found for whether satisfaction was rated by the patient or family/other. The complex relationships among satisfaction, patient demographics, and functional status require continued examination.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>14722417</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.BRS.0000107236.74004.31</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2004-01, Vol.29 (2), p.211-219
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80096207
source LWW_医学期刊
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord
Demography
Diagnosis-Related Groups - statistics & numerical data
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Length of Stay
Logistic Models
Male
Marital Status
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data
Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
Rehabilitation Centers - standards
Spinal Cord Injuries - classification
Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation
United States
title Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after spinal cord injury
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A16%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Satisfaction%20with%20medical%20rehabilitation%20after%20spinal%20cord%20injury&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=TOOTH,%20Leigh%20R&rft.date=2004-01-15&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=219&rft.pages=211-219&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.BRS.0000107236.74004.31&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80096207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8031bdc53f4d90179048188abfcffab4b673d0bef2a75ee89f3b0e2d327325e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80096207&rft_id=info:pmid/14722417&rfr_iscdi=true