Loading…
Indirect vs Direct Hospital Quality Indicators for Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants
CONTEXT Evidence-based selective referral strategies are being used by an increasing number of insurers to ensure that medical care is provided by high-quality providers. In the absence of direct-quality measures based on patient outcomes, the standards currently in place for many conditions rely on...
Saved in:
Published in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2004-01, Vol.291 (2), p.202-209 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | CONTEXT Evidence-based selective referral strategies are being used by an increasing
number of insurers to ensure that medical care is provided by high-quality
providers. In the absence of direct-quality measures based on patient outcomes,
the standards currently in place for many conditions rely on indirect-quality
measures such as patient volume. OBJECTIVES To assess the potential usefulness of volume as a quality indicator
for very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants and compare volume with other potential
indicators based on readily available hospital characteristics and patient
outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective study of 94Â 110 VLBW infants weighing 501 to 1500
g born in 332 Vermont Oxford Network hospitals with neonatal intensive care
units between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mortality among VLBW infants prior to discharge home; detailed case-mix
adjustment was performed by using patient characteristics available immediately
after birth. RESULTS In hospitals with less than 50 annual admissions of VLBW infants, an
additional 10 admissions were associated with an 11% reduction in mortality
(95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-16%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.291.2.202 |