Loading…
An evaluation of a 30‐gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section
Summary A 30‐gauge spinal needle was evaluated for Caesarean section, using a combined epidural/spinal technique, in 50 mothers. Spinal anaesthesia failed in six mothers and was inadequate in another six. General anaesthesia was required on one occasion. A 25% overall failure rate suggests that a 30...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Anaesthesia 1990-09, Vol.45 (9), p.767-768 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-2ce9bf94b1b06794c3cbd4eae38003c92a33c72c371703e7c1ed09b4ba99e7923 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-2ce9bf94b1b06794c3cbd4eae38003c92a33c72c371703e7c1ed09b4ba99e7923 |
| container_end_page | 768 |
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 767 |
| container_title | Anaesthesia |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Lesser, P. Bembridge, M. Lyons, G. Macdonald, R. |
| description | Summary
A 30‐gauge spinal needle was evaluated for Caesarean section, using a combined epidural/spinal technique, in 50 mothers. Spinal anaesthesia failed in six mothers and was inadequate in another six. General anaesthesia was required on one occasion. A 25% overall failure rate suggests that a 30‐gauge needle is not a practical proposition for routine clinical practice. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14451.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80118219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80118219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-2ce9bf94b1b06794c3cbd4eae38003c92a33c72c371703e7c1ed09b4ba99e7923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM9O20AQxlcVFaTQR6i0QqI3u7N_kvVyQVGUQiXUComeV-PNODhy7OCNIdz6CH3GPgnrxgpn9jLa-b6Z-fRj7FxAKuL7tkqFmowTCVqnwlpIt7nQeizS3Qc2OkhHbAQAKpEa7An7FMIKQMhMZMfsWMbmWMOI3U1rTk9Ydbgtm5o3BUeu4N-fv0vslsRrokVFvGhaHjZljRXHGilsHyiU-L89i19sCWseyPc7ztjHAqtAn4d6yn5_n9_PbpLbX9c_ZtPbxGsAk0hPNi-szkUOE2O1Vz5faEJSWQztrUSlvJFeGWFAkfGCFmBznaO1ZKxUp-zrfu-mbR67mMmty-CpqrCmpgsuAyEyKWw0Xu6Nvm1CaKlwm7ZcY_viBLiep1u5Hprrobmepxt4ul0c_jJc6fI1LQ6jA8CoXww6Bo9V0WLty_B2wSqppZpE39Xe91xW9PKOBG76czo3E6NeAQMVknA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80118219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of a 30‐gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lesser, P. ; Bembridge, M. ; Lyons, G. ; Macdonald, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lesser, P. ; Bembridge, M. ; Lyons, G. ; Macdonald, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
A 30‐gauge spinal needle was evaluated for Caesarean section, using a combined epidural/spinal technique, in 50 mothers. Spinal anaesthesia failed in six mothers and was inadequate in another six. General anaesthesia was required on one occasion. A 25% overall failure rate suggests that a 30‐gauge needle is not a practical proposition for routine clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14451.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2240540</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANASAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anaesthesia; obstetric ; Anaesthetic techniques, regional; spinal ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Epidural - instrumentation ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical - instrumentation ; Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects ; Anesthesia, Spinal - instrumentation ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cesarean Section ; Female ; Headache - etiology ; Headache - prevention & control ; Humans ; Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment) ; Medical sciences ; Needles ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 1990-09, Vol.45 (9), p.767-768</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-2ce9bf94b1b06794c3cbd4eae38003c92a33c72c371703e7c1ed09b4ba99e7923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-2ce9bf94b1b06794c3cbd4eae38003c92a33c72c371703e7c1ed09b4ba99e7923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19324236$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2240540$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lesser, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bembridge, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, R.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of a 30‐gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>Summary
A 30‐gauge spinal needle was evaluated for Caesarean section, using a combined epidural/spinal technique, in 50 mothers. Spinal anaesthesia failed in six mothers and was inadequate in another six. General anaesthesia was required on one occasion. A 25% overall failure rate suggests that a 30‐gauge needle is not a practical proposition for routine clinical practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anaesthesia; obstetric</subject><subject>Anaesthetic techniques, regional; spinal</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Epidural - instrumentation</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Obstetrical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Headache - etiology</subject><subject>Headache - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Needles</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkM9O20AQxlcVFaTQR6i0QqI3u7N_kvVyQVGUQiXUComeV-PNODhy7OCNIdz6CH3GPgnrxgpn9jLa-b6Z-fRj7FxAKuL7tkqFmowTCVqnwlpIt7nQeizS3Qc2OkhHbAQAKpEa7An7FMIKQMhMZMfsWMbmWMOI3U1rTk9Ydbgtm5o3BUeu4N-fv0vslsRrokVFvGhaHjZljRXHGilsHyiU-L89i19sCWseyPc7ztjHAqtAn4d6yn5_n9_PbpLbX9c_ZtPbxGsAk0hPNi-szkUOE2O1Vz5faEJSWQztrUSlvJFeGWFAkfGCFmBznaO1ZKxUp-zrfu-mbR67mMmty-CpqrCmpgsuAyEyKWw0Xu6Nvm1CaKlwm7ZcY_viBLiep1u5Hprrobmepxt4ul0c_jJc6fI1LQ6jA8CoXww6Bo9V0WLty_B2wSqppZpE39Xe91xW9PKOBG76czo3E6NeAQMVknA</recordid><startdate>199009</startdate><enddate>199009</enddate><creator>Lesser, P.</creator><creator>Bembridge, M.</creator><creator>Lyons, G.</creator><creator>Macdonald, R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199009</creationdate><title>An evaluation of a 30‐gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section</title><author>Lesser, P. ; Bembridge, M. ; Lyons, G. ; Macdonald, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-2ce9bf94b1b06794c3cbd4eae38003c92a33c72c371703e7c1ed09b4ba99e7923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anaesthesia; obstetric</topic><topic>Anaesthetic techniques, regional; spinal</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Epidural - instrumentation</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Obstetrical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Headache - etiology</topic><topic>Headache - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Needles</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lesser, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bembridge, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lesser, P.</au><au>Bembridge, M.</au><au>Lyons, G.</au><au>Macdonald, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of a 30‐gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>1990-09</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>768</epage><pages>767-768</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><coden>ANASAB</coden><abstract>Summary
A 30‐gauge spinal needle was evaluated for Caesarean section, using a combined epidural/spinal technique, in 50 mothers. Spinal anaesthesia failed in six mothers and was inadequate in another six. General anaesthesia was required on one occasion. A 25% overall failure rate suggests that a 30‐gauge needle is not a practical proposition for routine clinical practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>2240540</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14451.x</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-2409 |
| ispartof | Anaesthesia, 1990-09, Vol.45 (9), p.767-768 |
| issn | 0003-2409 1365-2044 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80118219 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Anaesthesia obstetric Anaesthetic techniques, regional spinal Anesthesia Anesthesia, Epidural - instrumentation Anesthesia, Obstetrical - instrumentation Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects Anesthesia, Spinal - instrumentation Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Cesarean Section Female Headache - etiology Headache - prevention & control Humans Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment) Medical sciences Needles Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Pregnancy |
| title | An evaluation of a 30‐gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20a%2030%E2%80%90gauge%20needle%20for%20spinal%20anaesthesia%20for%20Caesarean%20section&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=Lesser,%20P.&rft.date=1990-09&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=768&rft.pages=767-768&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft.coden=ANASAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14451.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80118219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-2ce9bf94b1b06794c3cbd4eae38003c92a33c72c371703e7c1ed09b4ba99e7923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80118219&rft_id=info:pmid/2240540&rfr_iscdi=true |