Loading…

Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care

To determine whether transferring the care of patients to another senior resident the day after admission to the hospital adversely affects the efficiency and quality of care. Retrospective analysis of a natural experiment. The general medical service of the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Cent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 1990-11, Vol.5 (6), p.501-505
Main Authors: Lofgren, R P, Gottlieb, D, Williams, R A, Rich, E C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-f56bc2492bb91816de86df14332e082f5fef252d721336ec6b12b7a59a935a753
container_end_page 505
container_issue 6
container_start_page 501
container_title Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM
container_volume 5
creator Lofgren, R P
Gottlieb, D
Williams, R A
Rich, E C
description To determine whether transferring the care of patients to another senior resident the day after admission to the hospital adversely affects the efficiency and quality of care. Retrospective analysis of a natural experiment. The general medical service of the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a major tertiary teaching hospital of the University of Minnesota internal medicine residency program. Subjects were all the patients admitted to the medicine service from 5:00 PM to 6:00 AM over an eight-month period. After 5:00 PM, half of the patients were admitted to the hospital by a cross-covering senior resident (CC group of patients), and their care was transferred to a different senior resident the following day. The other patients were initially evaluated by the primary senior resident (PE group of patients). Assignment to the different services was a random, sequential process. The CC group had significantly more laboratory tests performed during their hospital stay than did the PE group of patients (44 vs. 32, p = 0.01), even when adjusted for length of stay. Using multiple linear regression to adjust for other clinical parameters including length of stay, DRG weight, and number of consults, the authors found that being a CC subject was a significant predictor of the number of laboratory tests obtained (p = 0.01). Furthermore, the median length of stay in the CC group (n = 74) was longer than that in the PE group (n = 72) (eight days vs. six days); this was of borderline statistical significance, using a two-sample median test (p = 0.06). Patients transferred to a different resident the day after admission had more laboratory tests performed and longer inpatient stays.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02600880
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80196155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80196155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-f56bc2492bb91816de86df14332e082f5fef252d721336ec6b12b7a59a935a753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFLwzAYxYMoc04v3oWePAjV5EuTpt50OB0M9KDnkqZfINI1NckO--9t2dDTezx-vMOPkGtG7xml5cPzioKkVCl6QuZMgMhZUZWnZD5ORa5KXpyTixi_KWUcQM3IDEDKgsOcrD98TLnRXZeloPtoMWTeZgGja7FPUxl8H13jOpf2j5lLMUNr0aTM99mgk5soowNekjOru4hXx1yQr9XL5_It37y_rpdPm9xAwVJuhWzGVkHTVEwx2aKSrWUF54BUgRUWLQhoS2CcSzSyYdCUWlS64kKXgi_I7eF3CP5nhzHVWxcNdp3u0e9irSirJBMTeHcATfAxBrT1ENxWh33NaD15q_-9jfDN8XXXbLH9Q4-i-C8cT2b5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80196155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care</title><source>Springer Online Journal Archives</source><creator>Lofgren, R P ; Gottlieb, D ; Williams, R A ; Rich, E C</creator><creatorcontrib>Lofgren, R P ; Gottlieb, D ; Williams, R A ; Rich, E C</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether transferring the care of patients to another senior resident the day after admission to the hospital adversely affects the efficiency and quality of care. Retrospective analysis of a natural experiment. The general medical service of the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a major tertiary teaching hospital of the University of Minnesota internal medicine residency program. Subjects were all the patients admitted to the medicine service from 5:00 PM to 6:00 AM over an eight-month period. After 5:00 PM, half of the patients were admitted to the hospital by a cross-covering senior resident (CC group of patients), and their care was transferred to a different senior resident the following day. The other patients were initially evaluated by the primary senior resident (PE group of patients). Assignment to the different services was a random, sequential process. The CC group had significantly more laboratory tests performed during their hospital stay than did the PE group of patients (44 vs. 32, p = 0.01), even when adjusted for length of stay. Using multiple linear regression to adjust for other clinical parameters including length of stay, DRG weight, and number of consults, the authors found that being a CC subject was a significant predictor of the number of laboratory tests obtained (p = 0.01). Furthermore, the median length of stay in the CC group (n = 74) was longer than that in the PE group (n = 72) (eight days vs. six days); this was of borderline statistical significance, using a two-sample median test (p = 0.06). Patients transferred to a different resident the day after admission had more laboratory tests performed and longer inpatient stays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02600880</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2266432</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Chi-Square Distribution ; Continuity of Patient Care - standards ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Length of Stay ; Minnesota ; Patient Admission ; Patient Care Planning ; Quality of Health Care ; Random Allocation ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 1990-11, Vol.5 (6), p.501-505</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-f56bc2492bb91816de86df14332e082f5fef252d721336ec6b12b7a59a935a753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2266432$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lofgren, R P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottlieb, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, E C</creatorcontrib><title>Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>To determine whether transferring the care of patients to another senior resident the day after admission to the hospital adversely affects the efficiency and quality of care. Retrospective analysis of a natural experiment. The general medical service of the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a major tertiary teaching hospital of the University of Minnesota internal medicine residency program. Subjects were all the patients admitted to the medicine service from 5:00 PM to 6:00 AM over an eight-month period. After 5:00 PM, half of the patients were admitted to the hospital by a cross-covering senior resident (CC group of patients), and their care was transferred to a different senior resident the following day. The other patients were initially evaluated by the primary senior resident (PE group of patients). Assignment to the different services was a random, sequential process. The CC group had significantly more laboratory tests performed during their hospital stay than did the PE group of patients (44 vs. 32, p = 0.01), even when adjusted for length of stay. Using multiple linear regression to adjust for other clinical parameters including length of stay, DRG weight, and number of consults, the authors found that being a CC subject was a significant predictor of the number of laboratory tests obtained (p = 0.01). Furthermore, the median length of stay in the CC group (n = 74) was longer than that in the PE group (n = 72) (eight days vs. six days); this was of borderline statistical significance, using a two-sample median test (p = 0.06). Patients transferred to a different resident the day after admission had more laboratory tests performed and longer inpatient stays.</description><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMFLwzAYxYMoc04v3oWePAjV5EuTpt50OB0M9KDnkqZfINI1NckO--9t2dDTezx-vMOPkGtG7xml5cPzioKkVCl6QuZMgMhZUZWnZD5ORa5KXpyTixi_KWUcQM3IDEDKgsOcrD98TLnRXZeloPtoMWTeZgGja7FPUxl8H13jOpf2j5lLMUNr0aTM99mgk5soowNekjOru4hXx1yQr9XL5_It37y_rpdPm9xAwVJuhWzGVkHTVEwx2aKSrWUF54BUgRUWLQhoS2CcSzSyYdCUWlS64kKXgi_I7eF3CP5nhzHVWxcNdp3u0e9irSirJBMTeHcATfAxBrT1ENxWh33NaD15q_-9jfDN8XXXbLH9Q4-i-C8cT2b5</recordid><startdate>199011</startdate><enddate>199011</enddate><creator>Lofgren, R P</creator><creator>Gottlieb, D</creator><creator>Williams, R A</creator><creator>Rich, E C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199011</creationdate><title>Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care</title><author>Lofgren, R P ; Gottlieb, D ; Williams, R A ; Rich, E C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-f56bc2492bb91816de86df14332e082f5fef252d721336ec6b12b7a59a935a753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lofgren, R P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottlieb, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, E C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lofgren, R P</au><au>Gottlieb, D</au><au>Williams, R A</au><au>Rich, E C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>1990-11</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>501-505</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>To determine whether transferring the care of patients to another senior resident the day after admission to the hospital adversely affects the efficiency and quality of care. Retrospective analysis of a natural experiment. The general medical service of the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a major tertiary teaching hospital of the University of Minnesota internal medicine residency program. Subjects were all the patients admitted to the medicine service from 5:00 PM to 6:00 AM over an eight-month period. After 5:00 PM, half of the patients were admitted to the hospital by a cross-covering senior resident (CC group of patients), and their care was transferred to a different senior resident the following day. The other patients were initially evaluated by the primary senior resident (PE group of patients). Assignment to the different services was a random, sequential process. The CC group had significantly more laboratory tests performed during their hospital stay than did the PE group of patients (44 vs. 32, p = 0.01), even when adjusted for length of stay. Using multiple linear regression to adjust for other clinical parameters including length of stay, DRG weight, and number of consults, the authors found that being a CC subject was a significant predictor of the number of laboratory tests obtained (p = 0.01). Furthermore, the median length of stay in the CC group (n = 74) was longer than that in the PE group (n = 72) (eight days vs. six days); this was of borderline statistical significance, using a two-sample median test (p = 0.06). Patients transferred to a different resident the day after admission had more laboratory tests performed and longer inpatient stays.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>2266432</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02600880</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-8734
ispartof Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 1990-11, Vol.5 (6), p.501-505
issn 0884-8734
1525-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80196155
source Springer Online Journal Archives
subjects Chi-Square Distribution
Continuity of Patient Care - standards
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
Internship and Residency
Length of Stay
Minnesota
Patient Admission
Patient Care Planning
Quality of Health Care
Random Allocation
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
title Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-call%20transfer%20of%20resident%20responsibility:%20its%20effect%20on%20patient%20care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Lofgren,%20R%20P&rft.date=1990-11&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=501-505&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02600880&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80196155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-f56bc2492bb91816de86df14332e082f5fef252d721336ec6b12b7a59a935a753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80196155&rft_id=info:pmid/2266432&rfr_iscdi=true