Loading…
Market or Government: Lessons from a Comparative Analysis of the Experience of Pakistan and India [with Comments]
In the 1980s a remarkable consensus developed that all economies, including the Less Developed Countries (LDC), will achieve both more rapid growth and alleviation of poverty with greater reliance on a market oriented strategy and minimal government direct control and ownership in the economy. The d...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pakistan development review 1991, Vol.30 (4), p.601-646 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In the 1980s a remarkable consensus developed that all
economies, including the Less Developed Countries (LDC), will achieve
both more rapid growth and alleviation of poverty with greater reliance
on a market oriented strategy and minimal government direct control and
ownership in the economy. The disputes that remain have to do with
marginal issues: how fast to move from dirigiste to private enterprise
systems and the extent to which there is a residual role for government
in dealing with market imperfections. There remain a few unregenerate
interventionists, especially in South Asia, but they are definitely a
beleaguered minority. Even more remarkable is that the consensus is not
only with respect to the economic efficiency of the market, but is
nearly as great on its effectiveness in reducing poverty. A powerful
tool for analyzing whether greater reliance on markets indeed is
successful in raising the rate of growth and reducing the extent of
poverty is to compare the experience of similar countries with different
strategies in that respect A comparison of the experience of India with
that of Pakistan and Bangladesh during the last 40 years can be
particularly fruitful because: |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0030-9729 |
DOI: | 10.30541/v30i4ipp.601-646 |