Loading…

Variation in Hemoglobin F Production Among Normal and Sickle Cell Adults Is Not Related to Nucleotide Substitutions in the Gamma Promoter Regions

Single nucleotide substitutions in the promoter regions of the Ay- and Gγ-globin genes have been associated with increased fetal hemoglobin (HbF) production. We wished to determine whether these or other unrecognized substitutions in the γ promoter regions are responsible for the 20-fold variation i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood 1991-01, Vol.77 (1), p.174-177
Main Authors: Economou, E.P., Antonarakis, S.E., Kazazian, H.H., Serjeant, G.R., Dover, G.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Single nucleotide substitutions in the promoter regions of the Ay- and Gγ-globin genes have been associated with increased fetal hemoglobin (HbF) production. We wished to determine whether these or other unrecognized substitutions in the γ promoter regions are responsible for the 20-fold variation in HbF production in sickle cell patients or normal adults. From a random sampling of 250 sickle cell (SS) patients and 125 normal adults, 17 individuals representing the highest and lowest HbF producers were selected for study. All three common restriction fragment length polymorphism β-globin region haplotypes (Benin, Central African Republic, and Senegal) were found in both the highest and lowest HbF producers with SS disease. Using the polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing of the amplified DNA product, we examined the promoter regions of both the Aγ and Gγ genes from -350 bp to +50 bp of the CAP site. No mutations were found in either γ gene promoter region. We conclude that nucleotide substitutions in the promoter regions (-350 to +50 bp) of bothγ genes are not responsible for the marked variation in HbF production among SS or normal individuals.
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood.V77.1.174.174