Stress echocardiography and the human factor: The importance of being expert

The aim of this study was to evaluate how the diagnostic accuracy of a stress echocardiography procedure, such as a dipyridamole echocardiography test, depends on the specific experience of the physician interpreting the test. Recordings of 50 consecutive dipyridamole echocardiography tests were sel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1991-03, Vol.17 (3), p.666-669
Main Authors: Picano, Eugenio, Lattanzi, Fabio, Orlandini, Andrés, Marini, Cecilia, L'Abbate, Antonio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Disease - diagnosis
Coronary Disease - physiopathology
Dipyridamole
Echocardiography - methods
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stress, Physiological - physiopathology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to evaluate how the diagnostic accuracy of a stress echocardiography procedure, such as a dipyridamole echocardiography test, depends on the specific experience of the physician interpreting the test. Recordings of 50 consecutive dipyridamole echocardiography tests were selected for the first part of the study. They were analyzed by 20 experienced echocar-diographers with different backgrounds in stress echocardiography: 10 beginners (70% coronary stenosis of at least one major coronary artery) was 62 ± 6% for beginners and 85 ± 3% for experienced observers (p < 0.0001). In the second part of the study, 10 observers (5 beginners and 5 experienced observers) evaluated 2 different sets of 50 dipyridamole echocardiographic test studies before and after the training of the beginners. Before training, the accuracy of beginners was lower than that of experienced observers (61 ±7% versus 85 ± 3%; p < 0.001). After training, the accuracy gap was closed (83 ± 3% versus 86 ± 2%; p = NS). Therefore, interpretation of stress echocardiographic tests by an echocardiographer without specific training severely underestimates the diagnostic potential of this technique. One hundred stress echocardiographic studies are more than adequate to build the individual learning curve and reach the plateau of diagnostic accuracy that the test can yield.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80182-2