Peer evaluation: a process of development

Recently, peer evaluation, or peer review as it is sometimes termed, has been identified as one of these methods. Because professional growth was valued, the faculty undertook the task of developing a systematic means of peer evaluation through the development of a peer evaluation tool. The work of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of nursing education 1983-02, Vol.22 (2), p.93-95
Main Authors: Dennis, C M, Woodtli, A O, Hatcher, B J, Hilton, A M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavior
Behavioral Objectives
Beliefs
Brainstorming
Classroom Environment
Classrooms
Committees
Educational Development
Evaluators
Faculty Development
Faculty Evaluation
Faculty, Nursing
Feedback
Instructional Effectiveness
Learning
Nursing Education
Nursing schools
Objectives
Opportunities
Peer Evaluation
Peer Review
Philosophy
Professional Development
Rating Scales
Self Actualization
Students
Teacher Effectiveness
Teacher Evaluation
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching - standards
Teaching Skills
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-6ab54765216bcff779a6d7ed155cd3d38cc238bf63b3fdb8b55d7edd1491b8823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-6ab54765216bcff779a6d7ed155cd3d38cc238bf63b3fdb8b55d7edd1491b8823
container_end_page 95
container_issue 2
container_start_page 93
container_title The Journal of nursing education
container_volume 22
creator Dennis, C M
Woodtli, A O
Hatcher, B J
Hilton, A M
description Recently, peer evaluation, or peer review as it is sometimes termed, has been identified as one of these methods. Because professional growth was valued, the faculty undertook the task of developing a systematic means of peer evaluation through the development of a peer evaluation tool. The work of an ad hoc committee resulted in an experimental evaluation form that was made available for use by any faculty member on a voluntary basis. The hope in doing this was that faculty concerns of the past would be laid to rest, and peer evaluation could then be viewed as positive and worthwhile. [...]the committee wrote a philosophy for peer evaluation in our school of nursing. An example of this might be an instructor, expert in the care of the adult medicalsurgical patient, unable to assess whether a peer's classroom presentation on assessing behavior of the psychotic client "supplements text with relevant material." [...]a third column, "cannot assess" was added.
doi_str_mv 10.3928/0148-4834-19830201-11
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80452681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2709661321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-6ab54765216bcff779a6d7ed155cd3d38cc238bf63b3fdb8b55d7edd1491b8823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRaq3-hEJAEFxE586dmUzcSfEFBV3oephXoCWPmkkK_vsmtHbhwtVd3O8cDh8hc6B3mDN1T4GrlCvkKeQKKaOQApyQKeSoUsYZnJLpkTknFzGuKaVcMjkhEzkGeD4ltx8htEnYmrI33aqpHxKTbNrGhRiTpkh82Iay2VSh7i7JWWHKGK4Od0a-np8-F6_p8v3lbfG4TB1K2qXSWMEzKRhI64oiy3IjfRY8COE8elTOMVS2kGix8FZZIca3B56DVYrhjNzse4cZ332Ina5W0YWyNHVo-qgV5YJJBQN4_QdcN31bD9s00pwryjj-SwFlMqMZCBwosadc28TYhkJv2lVl2p8B0qNuParUo0r9q1vD2D4_tPe2Cv6YOvjFHTPWd88</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1026707153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer evaluation: a process of development</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Dennis, C M ; Woodtli, A O ; Hatcher, B J ; Hilton, A M</creator><creatorcontrib>Dennis, C M ; Woodtli, A O ; Hatcher, B J ; Hilton, A M</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, peer evaluation, or peer review as it is sometimes termed, has been identified as one of these methods. Because professional growth was valued, the faculty undertook the task of developing a systematic means of peer evaluation through the development of a peer evaluation tool. The work of an ad hoc committee resulted in an experimental evaluation form that was made available for use by any faculty member on a voluntary basis. The hope in doing this was that faculty concerns of the past would be laid to rest, and peer evaluation could then be viewed as positive and worthwhile. [...]the committee wrote a philosophy for peer evaluation in our school of nursing. An example of this might be an instructor, expert in the care of the adult medicalsurgical patient, unable to assess whether a peer's classroom presentation on assessing behavior of the psychotic client "supplements text with relevant material." [...]a third column, "cannot assess" was added.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-4834</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2421</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-19830201-11</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6302049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SLACK INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavioral Objectives ; Beliefs ; Brainstorming ; Classroom Environment ; Classrooms ; Committees ; Educational Development ; Evaluators ; Faculty Development ; Faculty Evaluation ; Faculty, Nursing ; Feedback ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Learning ; Nursing Education ; Nursing schools ; Objectives ; Opportunities ; Peer Evaluation ; Peer Review ; Philosophy ; Professional Development ; Rating Scales ; Self Actualization ; Students ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Teacher Evaluation ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching - standards ; Teaching Skills</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nursing education, 1983-02, Vol.22 (2), p.93-95</ispartof><rights>Copyright SLACK INCORPORATED Feb 1983</rights><rights>Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-6ab54765216bcff779a6d7ed155cd3d38cc238bf63b3fdb8b55d7edd1491b8823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-6ab54765216bcff779a6d7ed155cd3d38cc238bf63b3fdb8b55d7edd1491b8823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3094802431/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3094802431?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,43733,43880,74093,74269</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6302049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dennis, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodtli, A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatcher, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, A M</creatorcontrib><title>Peer evaluation: a process of development</title><title>The Journal of nursing education</title><addtitle>J Nurs Educ</addtitle><description>Recently, peer evaluation, or peer review as it is sometimes termed, has been identified as one of these methods. Because professional growth was valued, the faculty undertook the task of developing a systematic means of peer evaluation through the development of a peer evaluation tool. The work of an ad hoc committee resulted in an experimental evaluation form that was made available for use by any faculty member on a voluntary basis. The hope in doing this was that faculty concerns of the past would be laid to rest, and peer evaluation could then be viewed as positive and worthwhile. [...]the committee wrote a philosophy for peer evaluation in our school of nursing. An example of this might be an instructor, expert in the care of the adult medicalsurgical patient, unable to assess whether a peer's classroom presentation on assessing behavior of the psychotic client "supplements text with relevant material." [...]a third column, "cannot assess" was added.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Brainstorming</subject><subject>Classroom Environment</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Educational Development</subject><subject>Evaluators</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Faculty Evaluation</subject><subject>Faculty, Nursing</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Nursing Education</subject><subject>Nursing schools</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Opportunities</subject><subject>Peer Evaluation</subject><subject>Peer Review</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Self Actualization</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teacher Evaluation</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching - standards</subject><subject>Teaching Skills</subject><issn>0148-4834</issn><issn>1938-2421</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRaq3-hEJAEFxE586dmUzcSfEFBV3oephXoCWPmkkK_vsmtHbhwtVd3O8cDh8hc6B3mDN1T4GrlCvkKeQKKaOQApyQKeSoUsYZnJLpkTknFzGuKaVcMjkhEzkGeD4ltx8htEnYmrI33aqpHxKTbNrGhRiTpkh82Iay2VSh7i7JWWHKGK4Od0a-np8-F6_p8v3lbfG4TB1K2qXSWMEzKRhI64oiy3IjfRY8COE8elTOMVS2kGix8FZZIca3B56DVYrhjNzse4cZ332Ina5W0YWyNHVo-qgV5YJJBQN4_QdcN31bD9s00pwryjj-SwFlMqMZCBwosadc28TYhkJv2lVl2p8B0qNuParUo0r9q1vD2D4_tPe2Cv6YOvjFHTPWd88</recordid><startdate>198302</startdate><enddate>198302</enddate><creator>Dennis, C M</creator><creator>Woodtli, A O</creator><creator>Hatcher, B J</creator><creator>Hilton, A M</creator><general>SLACK INCORPORATED</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198302</creationdate><title>Peer evaluation: a process of development</title><author>Dennis, C M ; Woodtli, A O ; Hatcher, B J ; Hilton, A M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-6ab54765216bcff779a6d7ed155cd3d38cc238bf63b3fdb8b55d7edd1491b8823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Brainstorming</topic><topic>Classroom Environment</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Educational Development</topic><topic>Evaluators</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Faculty Evaluation</topic><topic>Faculty, Nursing</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Nursing Education</topic><topic>Nursing schools</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Opportunities</topic><topic>Peer Evaluation</topic><topic>Peer Review</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Self Actualization</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teacher Evaluation</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching - standards</topic><topic>Teaching Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dennis, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodtli, A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatcher, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, A M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nursing education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dennis, C M</au><au>Woodtli, A O</au><au>Hatcher, B J</au><au>Hilton, A M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peer evaluation: a process of development</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nursing education</jtitle><addtitle>J Nurs Educ</addtitle><date>1983-02</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>93-95</pages><issn>0148-4834</issn><eissn>1938-2421</eissn><abstract>Recently, peer evaluation, or peer review as it is sometimes termed, has been identified as one of these methods. Because professional growth was valued, the faculty undertook the task of developing a systematic means of peer evaluation through the development of a peer evaluation tool. The work of an ad hoc committee resulted in an experimental evaluation form that was made available for use by any faculty member on a voluntary basis. The hope in doing this was that faculty concerns of the past would be laid to rest, and peer evaluation could then be viewed as positive and worthwhile. [...]the committee wrote a philosophy for peer evaluation in our school of nursing. An example of this might be an instructor, expert in the care of the adult medicalsurgical patient, unable to assess whether a peer's classroom presentation on assessing behavior of the psychotic client "supplements text with relevant material." [...]a third column, "cannot assess" was added.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SLACK INCORPORATED</pub><pmid>6302049</pmid><doi>10.3928/0148-4834-19830201-11</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-4834
ispartof The Journal of nursing education, 1983-02, Vol.22 (2), p.93-95
issn 0148-4834
1938-2421
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80452681
source Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Behavior
Behavioral Objectives
Beliefs
Brainstorming
Classroom Environment
Classrooms
Committees
Educational Development
Evaluators
Faculty Development
Faculty Evaluation
Faculty, Nursing
Feedback
Instructional Effectiveness
Learning
Nursing Education
Nursing schools
Objectives
Opportunities
Peer Evaluation
Peer Review
Philosophy
Professional Development
Rating Scales
Self Actualization
Students
Teacher Effectiveness
Teacher Evaluation
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching - standards
Teaching Skills
title Peer evaluation: a process of development
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A47%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer%20evaluation:%20a%20process%20of%20development&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nursing%20education&rft.au=Dennis,%20C%20M&rft.date=1983-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=93-95&rft.issn=0148-4834&rft.eissn=1938-2421&rft_id=info:doi/10.3928/0148-4834-19830201-11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2709661321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-6ab54765216bcff779a6d7ed155cd3d38cc238bf63b3fdb8b55d7edd1491b8823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1026707153&rft_id=info:pmid/6302049&rfr_iscdi=true