Loading…

Binding domains of colicins E1, E2 and E3 in the receptor protein btub ofEscherichia coli

Eight reagents specifically modifying amino acids were applied to cells of a standardEscherichia coli colicin indicator strain to followin vivo changes of its binding capacity for colicins E1–E3 and hence the binding domains (epitopes) for them in the outer membrane receptor protein BtuB. The effect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Folia microbiologica 2000-10, Vol.45 (5), p.379-385
Main Authors: Ŝmarda, J., Macholan, L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Eight reagents specifically modifying amino acids were applied to cells of a standardEscherichia coli colicin indicator strain to followin vivo changes of its binding capacity for colicins E1–E3 and hence the binding domains (epitopes) for them in the outer membrane receptor protein BtuB. The effect of these reagents was also investigated in a mutant strain carrying an extensive BtuB deletion. The following differences of the binding epitopes could be ascertained.Colicin E1: Blockage of OH-groups, just as N-substitution of His and modification of Arg and Trp enhance binding of colicin E1. In the deleted receptor, also abolition of carboxylic anion bonds enhances its affinity for colicin E1. It follows that colicin E1 is bound, most of all, to the hydrophobic domain A (loops 1+2) of BtuB.Colicins E2 and E3: both exert rather analogous binding parameters. In contrast to E1, O-substitution of Ser and Thr dramatically decreases the E2 and E3 binding, similarly to modification of Lys. There is also a clear difference in the binding affinity of the domain for E2 and/or E3 and for E1 following modifications of their Arg and His. Colicins E2 and E3 are rather bound to the hydrophilic domain B (loops 5–7) of the receptor. In this respect, interactions of colicins E2 and E3 with deeper parts of A and B domains (Trp, several Arg, Lys and His residues) exhibited subtle differences. Acidic pH (4.5–6.0) shows a positive, while pH 7.0–8.5 a rather negative impact on the receptor-binding function for the colicins. It was clearly demonstrated that there is just a partial difference between the binding behavior of colicins E1, E2 and/or E3.
ISSN:0015-5632
1874-9356
DOI:10.1007/BF02817609