Development and use of self-report techniques for assessing sexual functioning: a review and critique

This is a review and chronological perspective on the development of self-report measures designed to describe an individual's sexual functioning. It includes scales that provide data on both heterosexual and homosexual behavior. Attitude scales are also included, but only those that reflect an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of sexual behavior 1983-12, Vol.12 (6), p.555-576
Main Author: CONTE, H. R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Arousal
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Personality. Affectivity
Psychological Tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Self Disclosure
Sexual Behavior
Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological - diagnosis
Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological - psychology
Sexuality. Sexual behavior
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This is a review and chronological perspective on the development of self-report measures designed to describe an individual's sexual functioning. It includes scales that provide data on both heterosexual and homosexual behavior. Attitude scales are also included, but only those that reflect an individual's attitudes toward his own or his partner's behavior. Two classes of self-report measures are evaluated: (1) unidimensional scales that are relatively short and restricted in the information they supply; and (2) multidimensional inventories or questionnaires that elicit a wider variety of information. Available psychometric data are provided, and the measures are critically examined from both a research and a clinical point of view. It was concluded that unidimensional scales are probably more useful for research settings, while multidimensional inventories appear to have greater potential in clinical settings. All the test instruments reviewed would benefit from refinements, and recommendations are made that additional validity studies be conducted and more normative data be provided.
ISSN:0004-0002
1573-2800
DOI:10.1007/BF01542217