Loading…
Social schemata of emotionally disturbed boys and their male siblings
Compared the social schemata of a group of 12 emotionally disturbed boys (R) with those of their 12 male siblings (NR) and an equated-control group (C) of 12 boys. It was hypothesized that the human figures would be the greatest distance apart in the schemata of Group R, with the "mother-son&qu...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 1971-04, Vol.36 (2), p.281-285 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-f633ef2be9c3d870053138c15b87d36269d9f70b5aabcab52b77050c7146c33 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 285 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 281 |
| container_title | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | DuHamel, Thomas R Jarmon, Harold |
| description | Compared the social schemata of a group of 12 emotionally disturbed boys (R) with those of their 12 male siblings (NR) and an equated-control group (C) of 12 boys. It was hypothesized that the human figures would be the greatest distance apart in the schemata of Group R, with the "mother-son" schema expected to provide the most noticeable group differences. Results indicate that Group R put a greater distance between pairs of human figures than Group C, but not more than Group NR. Unexpectedly, the groups did not differ in their separation of the mother and son figures. Findings are discussed within the framework of the "disturbed family" approach to the study of emotional problems in childhood. (15 ref.) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0030747 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80940876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614291221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-f633ef2be9c3d870053138c15b87d36269d9f70b5aabcab52b77050c7146c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLxDAUBeAgio4P8A8IQUXcVG-SNmmWMvgCwYUu3IUkTZ1IOqlJu5h_b2VGF4KruzgfB-5B6JjAFQEmrhcADEQpttCMSCYLSojYRjMASgsA_raH9nP-AADCodpFu6WkomblDN2-ROt1wNkuXKcHjWOLXRcHH5c6hBVufB7GZFyDTVxlrJcNHhbOJ9zp4HD2Jvjlez5EO60O2R1t7gF6ubt9nT8UT8_3j_Obp0IzToei5Yy5lhonLWtqAVAxwmpLKlOLZhJcNrIVYCqtjdWmokYIqMAKUnLL2AG6WLf2KX6OLg-q89m6EPTSxTGrGmQJteATPP0DP-KYpoey4qSkklBKJnT2HyJUQsklJd9Vl2tlU8w5uVb1yXc6rRQB9T29-pl-oiebwtF0rvmFm62n_Hyd616rPq-sToO3wWVlba8YV1TRmrAvOROILA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614291221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social schemata of emotionally disturbed boys and their male siblings</title><source>EBSCO_PsycARTICLES</source><creator>DuHamel, Thomas R ; Jarmon, Harold</creator><creatorcontrib>DuHamel, Thomas R ; Jarmon, Harold</creatorcontrib><description>Compared the social schemata of a group of 12 emotionally disturbed boys (R) with those of their 12 male siblings (NR) and an equated-control group (C) of 12 boys. It was hypothesized that the human figures would be the greatest distance apart in the schemata of Group R, with the "mother-son" schema expected to provide the most noticeable group differences. Results indicate that Group R put a greater distance between pairs of human figures than Group C, but not more than Group NR. Unexpectedly, the groups did not differ in their separation of the mother and son figures. Findings are discussed within the framework of the "disturbed family" approach to the study of emotional problems in childhood. (15 ref.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-006X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0030747</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4927834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Affective Symptoms ; Child ; Family ; Family Relations ; Father-Child Relations ; Human ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Mental Disorders ; Mother-Child Relations ; Peer Group ; Projective Techniques ; Sibling Relations ; Social Distance ; Social Perception ; Socialization</subject><ispartof>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 1971-04, Vol.36 (2), p.281-285</ispartof><rights>1971 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1971, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-f633ef2be9c3d870053138c15b87d36269d9f70b5aabcab52b77050c7146c33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4927834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DuHamel, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarmon, Harold</creatorcontrib><title>Social schemata of emotionally disturbed boys and their male siblings</title><title>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><description>Compared the social schemata of a group of 12 emotionally disturbed boys (R) with those of their 12 male siblings (NR) and an equated-control group (C) of 12 boys. It was hypothesized that the human figures would be the greatest distance apart in the schemata of Group R, with the "mother-son" schema expected to provide the most noticeable group differences. Results indicate that Group R put a greater distance between pairs of human figures than Group C, but not more than Group NR. Unexpectedly, the groups did not differ in their separation of the mother and son figures. Findings are discussed within the framework of the "disturbed family" approach to the study of emotional problems in childhood. (15 ref.)</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Affective Symptoms</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family Relations</subject><subject>Father-Child Relations</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mother-Child Relations</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Projective Techniques</subject><subject>Sibling Relations</subject><subject>Social Distance</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><issn>0022-006X</issn><issn>1939-2117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1971</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EtLxDAUBeAgio4P8A8IQUXcVG-SNmmWMvgCwYUu3IUkTZ1IOqlJu5h_b2VGF4KruzgfB-5B6JjAFQEmrhcADEQpttCMSCYLSojYRjMASgsA_raH9nP-AADCodpFu6WkomblDN2-ROt1wNkuXKcHjWOLXRcHH5c6hBVufB7GZFyDTVxlrJcNHhbOJ9zp4HD2Jvjlez5EO60O2R1t7gF6ubt9nT8UT8_3j_Obp0IzToei5Yy5lhonLWtqAVAxwmpLKlOLZhJcNrIVYCqtjdWmokYIqMAKUnLL2AG6WLf2KX6OLg-q89m6EPTSxTGrGmQJteATPP0DP-KYpoey4qSkklBKJnT2HyJUQsklJd9Vl2tlU8w5uVb1yXc6rRQB9T29-pl-oiebwtF0rvmFm62n_Hyd616rPq-sToO3wWVlba8YV1TRmrAvOROILA</recordid><startdate>197104</startdate><enddate>197104</enddate><creator>DuHamel, Thomas R</creator><creator>Jarmon, Harold</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197104</creationdate><title>Social schemata of emotionally disturbed boys and their male siblings</title><author>DuHamel, Thomas R ; Jarmon, Harold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-f633ef2be9c3d870053138c15b87d36269d9f70b5aabcab52b77050c7146c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1971</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Affective Symptoms</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family Relations</topic><topic>Father-Child Relations</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mother-Child Relations</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Projective Techniques</topic><topic>Sibling Relations</topic><topic>Social Distance</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DuHamel, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarmon, Harold</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DuHamel, Thomas R</au><au>Jarmon, Harold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social schemata of emotionally disturbed boys and their male siblings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>1971-04</date><risdate>1971</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>281-285</pages><issn>0022-006X</issn><eissn>1939-2117</eissn><abstract>Compared the social schemata of a group of 12 emotionally disturbed boys (R) with those of their 12 male siblings (NR) and an equated-control group (C) of 12 boys. It was hypothesized that the human figures would be the greatest distance apart in the schemata of Group R, with the "mother-son" schema expected to provide the most noticeable group differences. Results indicate that Group R put a greater distance between pairs of human figures than Group C, but not more than Group NR. Unexpectedly, the groups did not differ in their separation of the mother and son figures. Findings are discussed within the framework of the "disturbed family" approach to the study of emotional problems in childhood. (15 ref.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>4927834</pmid><doi>10.1037/h0030747</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-006X |
| ispartof | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 1971-04, Vol.36 (2), p.281-285 |
| issn | 0022-006X 1939-2117 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80940876 |
| source | EBSCO_PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Adolescent Affective Symptoms Child Family Family Relations Father-Child Relations Human Humans Interpersonal Relations Male Mental Disorders Mother-Child Relations Peer Group Projective Techniques Sibling Relations Social Distance Social Perception Socialization |
| title | Social schemata of emotionally disturbed boys and their male siblings |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A45%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20schemata%20of%20emotionally%20disturbed%20boys%20and%20their%20male%20siblings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20consulting%20and%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=DuHamel,%20Thomas%20R&rft.date=1971-04&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=281-285&rft.issn=0022-006X&rft.eissn=1939-2117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0030747&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614291221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-f633ef2be9c3d870053138c15b87d36269d9f70b5aabcab52b77050c7146c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614291221&rft_id=info:pmid/4927834&rfr_iscdi=true |