Comparison of ventricular steady-state infusion with bolus infusion and pressure recording for differentiating between arrested and non-arrested hydrocephalus

In 6 years 26 adult patients with chronic communicating or non-communicating hydrocephalus underwent ventricular fluid pressure (VFP) recording, including intraventricular steady-state and bolus infusion tests. Patients were treated with a shunt when steady-state infusion yielded a csf outflow resis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta neurochirurgica 1984-01, Vol.72 (1-2), p.15-29
Main Authors: TANS, J. T. J, POORTVLIET, D. C. J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts
Child
Chronic Disease
Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes
Heart Atria
Humans
Hydrocephalus - diagnosis
Hydrocephalus - surgery
Intracranial Pressure
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In 6 years 26 adult patients with chronic communicating or non-communicating hydrocephalus underwent ventricular fluid pressure (VFP) recording, including intraventricular steady-state and bolus infusion tests. Patients were treated with a shunt when steady-state infusion yielded a csf outflow resistance (Rcsfs) greater than 10 mm Hg/ml/min; the success rate was 83%. The main purpose of the study was to compare Rcsfs with outflow resistance obtained by bolus infusions (Rcsfb), pressure-volume index (PVI) and VFP. Rcsfs was higher than Rcsfb, particularly when resistance was high and the degree of disturbance of csf dynamics was reflected by Rcsfs better than by Rcsfb. The PVI showed a roughly inverse relationship with the Rcsfs but was not helpful in differentiating arrested from non-arrested hydrocephalus. Rcsfs and VFP correlated better than expected. A high Rcsfs was associated with an elevated VFP and a normal Rcsfs with a normal VFP. VFP only varied when Rcsfs exhibited a mild to moderate increase. It is concluded that steady-state infusion remains the most reliable method for the prediction of the result of shunting. We recommend shunting when Rcsfs is greater than 10 mm Hg/ml/min. Bolus infusions provide valuable data on brain elastance and additional information on csf outflow resistance. VFP recording is certainly worthwhile because infusion tests can be omitted when VFP is clearly elevated and useful information is obtained when Rcsf is borderline.
ISSN:0001-6268
0942-0940
DOI:10.1007/BF01406811