Collaborative research in medical education: a discussion of theory and practice

• Published in: Medical education 2010-12, Vol.44 (12), p.1175-1184
• Main Authors: O'Sullivan, Patricia S, Stoddard, Hugh A, Kalishman, Summers
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Cooperative Behavior; Education, Medical; Health participants; Humans; Interdisciplinary Communication; Medical sciences; Miscellaneous; Models, Educational; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Research - organization & administration; Research Design
• ISSN: 0308-0110; 1365-2923
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03768.x

Medical Education 2010: 44: 1175–1184 Context  Medical education researchers are inherently collaborators. This paper presents a discussion of theoretical frameworks, issues and challenges around collaborative research to prepare medical education researchers to enter into successful collaborations. It gives emphasis to the conceptual issues associated with collaborative research and applies these to medical education research. Although not a systematic literature review, the paper provides a rich discussion of issues which medical education researchers might consider when undertaking collaborative studies. Methods  Building on the work of others, we have classified collaborative research in three dimensions according to: the number of administrative units represented; the number of academic fields present, and the manner in which knowledge is created. Although some literature on collaboration focuses on the more traditional positivist perspective and emphasises outcomes, other literature comes from the constructivist framework, in which research is not driven by hypotheses and the approaches emphasised, but by the interaction between investigator and subject. Discussion  Collaborations are more effective when participants overtly clarify their motivations, values, definitions of appropriate data and accepted methodologies. These should be agreed upon prior to commencing a study. The way we currently educate researchers should be restructured if we want them to be able to undertake interdisciplinary research. Despite calls for researchers to be educated differently, most training programmes for developing researchers have demonstrated a limited, if not contrary, response to these calls. Conclusions  Collaborative research in medical education should be driven by the problem being investigated, by the new knowledge gained and by the interpersonal interactions that may be achieved. Success rests on recognising that many of the research problems we, as medical educators, address are fundamentally interdisciplinary in nature. This represents a transition to bridge the dichotomy often presented in medical education between theory building and addressing practical needs.