Loading…

Horizontal-Velocity and Variance Measurements in the Stable Boundary Layer Using Doppler Lidar: Sensitivity to Averaging Procedures

Quantitative data on turbulence variables aloft—above the region of the atmosphere conveniently measured from towers—have been an important but difficult measurement need for advancing understanding and modeling of the stable boundary layer (SBL). Vertical profiles of streamwise velocity variances o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology 2008-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1307-1327
Main Authors: Pichugina, Yelena L, Tucker, Sara C, Banta, Robert M, Brewer, WAlan, Kelley, Neil D, Jonkman, Bonnie J, Newsom, Rob K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-1a1933b7e964be7be7f7f9427780eb9578cc50588055ce8b9772705cead7cd973
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-1a1933b7e964be7be7f7f9427780eb9578cc50588055ce8b9772705cead7cd973
container_end_page 1327
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1307
container_title Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology
container_volume 25
creator Pichugina, Yelena L
Tucker, Sara C
Banta, Robert M
Brewer, WAlan
Kelley, Neil D
Jonkman, Bonnie J
Newsom, Rob K
description Quantitative data on turbulence variables aloft—above the region of the atmosphere conveniently measured from towers—have been an important but difficult measurement need for advancing understanding and modeling of the stable boundary layer (SBL). Vertical profiles of streamwise velocity variances obtained from NOAA’s high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL), which have been shown to be approximately equal to turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) for stable conditions, are a measure of the turbulence in the SBL. In the present study, the mean horizontal wind component U and variance σ2u were computed from HRDL measurements of the line-of-sight (LOS) velocity using a method described by Banta et al., which uses an elevation (vertical slice) scanning technique. The method was tested on datasets obtained during the Lamar Low-Level Jet Project (LLLJP) carried out in early September 2003, near the town of Lamar in southeastern Colorado. This paper compares U with mean wind speed obtained from sodar and sonic anemometer measurements. The results for the mean U and mean wind speed measured by sodar and in situ instruments for all nights of LLLJP show high correlation (0.71–0.97), independent of sampling strategies and averaging procedures, and correlation coefficients consistently >0.9 for four high-wind nights, when the low-level jet speeds exceeded 15 m s−1 at some time during the night. Comparison of estimates of variance, on the other hand, proved sensitive to both the spatial and temporal averaging parameters. Several series of averaging tests are described, to find the best correlation between TKE calculated from sonic anemometer data at several tower levels and lidar measurements of horizontal-velocity variance σ2u. Because of the nonstationarity of the SBL data, the best results were obtained when the velocity data were first averaged over intervals of 1 min, and then further averaged over 3–15 consecutive 1-min intervals, with best results for the 10- and 15-min averaging periods. For these cases, correlation coefficients exceeded 0.9. As a part of the analysis, Eulerian integral time scales (τ) were estimated for the four high-wind nights. Time series of τ through each night indicated erratic behavior consistent with the nonstationarity. Histograms of τ showed a mode at 4–5 s, but frequent occurrences of larger τ values, mostly between 10 and 100 s.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/2008JTECHA988.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815541142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>815541142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-1a1933b7e964be7be7f7f9427780eb9578cc50588055ce8b9772705cead7cd973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQQEVoIG6Sc6-ih7aXTTTa1UrqzXXTOsUlhXxcF612nCqsJVfSBpxr_3hl0kt7CAzMDPN4MDOEvAF2BiDFOWdMfbu5WCznWqkzOCAzEJxVrOHtKzJjstYVE5IfkdcpPTDGoIZ2Rn4vQ3RPwWczVnc4Buvyjho_0DsTnfEW6Xc0aYq4QZ8TdZ7mn0ivs-lHpJ_C5AcTd3RldhjpbXL-nn4O2-1YupUro4_0Gn1y2T3uvTnQ-SNGc7_nfsRgcSjmdEIO12ZMePo3H5PbLxc3i2W1uvp6uZivKtvUkCswoOu6l6jbpkdZYi3XuuFSKoa9FlJZK5hQiglhUfVaSi5ZKc0g7aBlfUzeP3u3MfyaMOVu45LFcTQew5Q6BUI0AA0v5LsXSc604KLeKz-8CIJULSipm7agb_9DH8IUfVm445wLrkCrAp0_QzaGlCKuu210m3LiDli3f3P3z5s7qP8ApfKbRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222528198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Horizontal-Velocity and Variance Measurements in the Stable Boundary Layer Using Doppler Lidar: Sensitivity to Averaging Procedures</title><source>Freely Accessible Science Journals - check A-Z of ejournals</source><creator>Pichugina, Yelena L ; Tucker, Sara C ; Banta, Robert M ; Brewer, WAlan ; Kelley, Neil D ; Jonkman, Bonnie J ; Newsom, Rob K</creator><creatorcontrib>Pichugina, Yelena L ; Tucker, Sara C ; Banta, Robert M ; Brewer, WAlan ; Kelley, Neil D ; Jonkman, Bonnie J ; Newsom, Rob K</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative data on turbulence variables aloft—above the region of the atmosphere conveniently measured from towers—have been an important but difficult measurement need for advancing understanding and modeling of the stable boundary layer (SBL). Vertical profiles of streamwise velocity variances obtained from NOAA’s high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL), which have been shown to be approximately equal to turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) for stable conditions, are a measure of the turbulence in the SBL. In the present study, the mean horizontal wind component U and variance σ2u were computed from HRDL measurements of the line-of-sight (LOS) velocity using a method described by Banta et al., which uses an elevation (vertical slice) scanning technique. The method was tested on datasets obtained during the Lamar Low-Level Jet Project (LLLJP) carried out in early September 2003, near the town of Lamar in southeastern Colorado. This paper compares U with mean wind speed obtained from sodar and sonic anemometer measurements. The results for the mean U and mean wind speed measured by sodar and in situ instruments for all nights of LLLJP show high correlation (0.71–0.97), independent of sampling strategies and averaging procedures, and correlation coefficients consistently &gt;0.9 for four high-wind nights, when the low-level jet speeds exceeded 15 m s−1 at some time during the night. Comparison of estimates of variance, on the other hand, proved sensitive to both the spatial and temporal averaging parameters. Several series of averaging tests are described, to find the best correlation between TKE calculated from sonic anemometer data at several tower levels and lidar measurements of horizontal-velocity variance σ2u. Because of the nonstationarity of the SBL data, the best results were obtained when the velocity data were first averaged over intervals of 1 min, and then further averaged over 3–15 consecutive 1-min intervals, with best results for the 10- and 15-min averaging periods. For these cases, correlation coefficients exceeded 0.9. As a part of the analysis, Eulerian integral time scales (τ) were estimated for the four high-wind nights. Time series of τ through each night indicated erratic behavior consistent with the nonstationarity. Histograms of τ showed a mode at 4–5 s, but frequent occurrences of larger τ values, mostly between 10 and 100 s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0739-0572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2008JTECHA988.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Anemometers ; Atmospherics ; Boundary layer ; Boundary layers ; Correlation coefficient ; Data processing ; Doppler ; Doppler effect ; Kinetic energy ; Lidar ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Regression analysis ; Remote sensing ; Standard deviation ; Turbulence ; Variance ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, 2008-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1307-1327</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-1a1933b7e964be7be7f7f9427780eb9578cc50588055ce8b9772705cead7cd973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-1a1933b7e964be7be7f7f9427780eb9578cc50588055ce8b9772705cead7cd973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pichugina, Yelena L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Sara C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banta, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, WAlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Neil D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonkman, Bonnie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newsom, Rob K</creatorcontrib><title>Horizontal-Velocity and Variance Measurements in the Stable Boundary Layer Using Doppler Lidar: Sensitivity to Averaging Procedures</title><title>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</title><description>Quantitative data on turbulence variables aloft—above the region of the atmosphere conveniently measured from towers—have been an important but difficult measurement need for advancing understanding and modeling of the stable boundary layer (SBL). Vertical profiles of streamwise velocity variances obtained from NOAA’s high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL), which have been shown to be approximately equal to turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) for stable conditions, are a measure of the turbulence in the SBL. In the present study, the mean horizontal wind component U and variance σ2u were computed from HRDL measurements of the line-of-sight (LOS) velocity using a method described by Banta et al., which uses an elevation (vertical slice) scanning technique. The method was tested on datasets obtained during the Lamar Low-Level Jet Project (LLLJP) carried out in early September 2003, near the town of Lamar in southeastern Colorado. This paper compares U with mean wind speed obtained from sodar and sonic anemometer measurements. The results for the mean U and mean wind speed measured by sodar and in situ instruments for all nights of LLLJP show high correlation (0.71–0.97), independent of sampling strategies and averaging procedures, and correlation coefficients consistently &gt;0.9 for four high-wind nights, when the low-level jet speeds exceeded 15 m s−1 at some time during the night. Comparison of estimates of variance, on the other hand, proved sensitive to both the spatial and temporal averaging parameters. Several series of averaging tests are described, to find the best correlation between TKE calculated from sonic anemometer data at several tower levels and lidar measurements of horizontal-velocity variance σ2u. Because of the nonstationarity of the SBL data, the best results were obtained when the velocity data were first averaged over intervals of 1 min, and then further averaged over 3–15 consecutive 1-min intervals, with best results for the 10- and 15-min averaging periods. For these cases, correlation coefficients exceeded 0.9. As a part of the analysis, Eulerian integral time scales (τ) were estimated for the four high-wind nights. Time series of τ through each night indicated erratic behavior consistent with the nonstationarity. Histograms of τ showed a mode at 4–5 s, but frequent occurrences of larger τ values, mostly between 10 and 100 s.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Anemometers</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Boundary layer</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Doppler</subject><subject>Doppler effect</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Variance</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0739-0572</issn><issn>1520-0426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQQEVoIG6Sc6-ih7aXTTTa1UrqzXXTOsUlhXxcF612nCqsJVfSBpxr_3hl0kt7CAzMDPN4MDOEvAF2BiDFOWdMfbu5WCznWqkzOCAzEJxVrOHtKzJjstYVE5IfkdcpPTDGoIZ2Rn4vQ3RPwWczVnc4Buvyjho_0DsTnfEW6Xc0aYq4QZ8TdZ7mn0ivs-lHpJ_C5AcTd3RldhjpbXL-nn4O2-1YupUro4_0Gn1y2T3uvTnQ-SNGc7_nfsRgcSjmdEIO12ZMePo3H5PbLxc3i2W1uvp6uZivKtvUkCswoOu6l6jbpkdZYi3XuuFSKoa9FlJZK5hQiglhUfVaSi5ZKc0g7aBlfUzeP3u3MfyaMOVu45LFcTQew5Q6BUI0AA0v5LsXSc604KLeKz-8CIJULSipm7agb_9DH8IUfVm445wLrkCrAp0_QzaGlCKuu210m3LiDli3f3P3z5s7qP8ApfKbRw</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Pichugina, Yelena L</creator><creator>Tucker, Sara C</creator><creator>Banta, Robert M</creator><creator>Brewer, WAlan</creator><creator>Kelley, Neil D</creator><creator>Jonkman, Bonnie J</creator><creator>Newsom, Rob K</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>Horizontal-Velocity and Variance Measurements in the Stable Boundary Layer Using Doppler Lidar: Sensitivity to Averaging Procedures</title><author>Pichugina, Yelena L ; Tucker, Sara C ; Banta, Robert M ; Brewer, WAlan ; Kelley, Neil D ; Jonkman, Bonnie J ; Newsom, Rob K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-1a1933b7e964be7be7f7f9427780eb9578cc50588055ce8b9772705cead7cd973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Anemometers</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Boundary layer</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Doppler</topic><topic>Doppler effect</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Variance</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pichugina, Yelena L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Sara C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banta, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, WAlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Neil D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonkman, Bonnie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newsom, Rob K</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pichugina, Yelena L</au><au>Tucker, Sara C</au><au>Banta, Robert M</au><au>Brewer, WAlan</au><au>Kelley, Neil D</au><au>Jonkman, Bonnie J</au><au>Newsom, Rob K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Horizontal-Velocity and Variance Measurements in the Stable Boundary Layer Using Doppler Lidar: Sensitivity to Averaging Procedures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</jtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1327</epage><pages>1307-1327</pages><issn>0739-0572</issn><eissn>1520-0426</eissn><abstract>Quantitative data on turbulence variables aloft—above the region of the atmosphere conveniently measured from towers—have been an important but difficult measurement need for advancing understanding and modeling of the stable boundary layer (SBL). Vertical profiles of streamwise velocity variances obtained from NOAA’s high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL), which have been shown to be approximately equal to turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) for stable conditions, are a measure of the turbulence in the SBL. In the present study, the mean horizontal wind component U and variance σ2u were computed from HRDL measurements of the line-of-sight (LOS) velocity using a method described by Banta et al., which uses an elevation (vertical slice) scanning technique. The method was tested on datasets obtained during the Lamar Low-Level Jet Project (LLLJP) carried out in early September 2003, near the town of Lamar in southeastern Colorado. This paper compares U with mean wind speed obtained from sodar and sonic anemometer measurements. The results for the mean U and mean wind speed measured by sodar and in situ instruments for all nights of LLLJP show high correlation (0.71–0.97), independent of sampling strategies and averaging procedures, and correlation coefficients consistently &gt;0.9 for four high-wind nights, when the low-level jet speeds exceeded 15 m s−1 at some time during the night. Comparison of estimates of variance, on the other hand, proved sensitive to both the spatial and temporal averaging parameters. Several series of averaging tests are described, to find the best correlation between TKE calculated from sonic anemometer data at several tower levels and lidar measurements of horizontal-velocity variance σ2u. Because of the nonstationarity of the SBL data, the best results were obtained when the velocity data were first averaged over intervals of 1 min, and then further averaged over 3–15 consecutive 1-min intervals, with best results for the 10- and 15-min averaging periods. For these cases, correlation coefficients exceeded 0.9. As a part of the analysis, Eulerian integral time scales (τ) were estimated for the four high-wind nights. Time series of τ through each night indicated erratic behavior consistent with the nonstationarity. Histograms of τ showed a mode at 4–5 s, but frequent occurrences of larger τ values, mostly between 10 and 100 s.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2008JTECHA988.1</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0739-0572
ispartof Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, 2008-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1307-1327
issn 0739-0572
1520-0426
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815541142
source Freely Accessible Science Journals - check A-Z of ejournals
subjects Agreements
Anemometers
Atmospherics
Boundary layer
Boundary layers
Correlation coefficient
Data processing
Doppler
Doppler effect
Kinetic energy
Lidar
Marine
Meteorology
Regression analysis
Remote sensing
Standard deviation
Turbulence
Variance
Wind speed
title Horizontal-Velocity and Variance Measurements in the Stable Boundary Layer Using Doppler Lidar: Sensitivity to Averaging Procedures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A37%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Horizontal-Velocity%20and%20Variance%20Measurements%20in%20the%20Stable%20Boundary%20Layer%20Using%20Doppler%20Lidar:%20Sensitivity%20to%20Averaging%20Procedures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20atmospheric%20and%20oceanic%20technology&rft.au=Pichugina,%20Yelena%20L&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1327&rft.pages=1307-1327&rft.issn=0739-0572&rft.eissn=1520-0426&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2008JTECHA988.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E815541142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-1a1933b7e964be7be7f7f9427780eb9578cc50588055ce8b9772705cead7cd973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222528198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true