Loading…

Gender Differences in the Incidence of Depression and Anxiety: Econometric Evidence from the USA

Using data from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) for the United States for the period 2001–2003, this paper addresses a vexed question relating to inter-gender differences in depression rates, namely how much of the observed difference in depression rates between men and wom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of happiness studies 2010-12, Vol.11 (6), p.663-682
Main Author: Borooah, Vani K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-38b3cfbf1f375fa3ca90d3cd9286f40aafb194c61bc76fff2849eb991fdccda03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-38b3cfbf1f375fa3ca90d3cd9286f40aafb194c61bc76fff2849eb991fdccda03
container_end_page 682
container_issue 6
container_start_page 663
container_title Journal of happiness studies
container_volume 11
creator Borooah, Vani K.
description Using data from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) for the United States for the period 2001–2003, this paper addresses a vexed question relating to inter-gender differences in depression rates, namely how much of the observed difference in depression rates between men and women may be explained by differences between them in their exposure , and how much may be explained by differences between them in their response , to depression-inducing factors. The contribution of this paper is to propose a method for disentangling these two influences and to apply it to US data. The central conclusion of the paper was differences between men and women in rates of depression and anxiety were largely to be explained by differences in their responses to depression-inducing factors: the percentage contribution of inter-gender response differences to explaining the overall difference in inter-gender probabilities of being depressed was 93 percent for “sad, empty type depression”; 92 percent for “very discouraged” type depression; and 69 percent for “loss of interest” type depression.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10902-009-9155-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818797650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2192680091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-38b3cfbf1f375fa3ca90d3cd9286f40aafb194c61bc76fff2849eb991fdccda03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4soOKcfwFvw4imaNG2TeBvbnIOBB905pumLdqzJTDpx397WCoLg6T0ev_-fxy9JLim5oYTw20iJJCkmRGJJ8xxnR8mI5pxhzgU57nYmJM4kF6fJWYwb0oFFUYySlwW4CgKa1dZCAGcgotqh9g3Q0pm66i_IWzSDXYAYa--QdhWauM8a2sMdmhvvfANtqA2af_zwNvjmu2L9NDlPTqzeRrj4meNkfT9_nj7g1eNiOZ2ssGEZbzETJTO2tNQynlvNjJakYqaSqShsRrS2JZWZKWhpeGGtTUUmoZSS2sqYShM2Tq6H3l3w73uIrWrqaGC71Q78PipBBZe8yHvy6g-58fvguueUIDzLRSpYB9EBMsHHGMCqXagbHQ6KEtUbV4Nx1YlUvXGVdZl0yMSOda8Qfov_D30BDu2EHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807458283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender Differences in the Incidence of Depression and Anxiety: Econometric Evidence from the USA</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Borooah, Vani K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Borooah, Vani K.</creatorcontrib><description>Using data from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) for the United States for the period 2001–2003, this paper addresses a vexed question relating to inter-gender differences in depression rates, namely how much of the observed difference in depression rates between men and women may be explained by differences between them in their exposure , and how much may be explained by differences between them in their response , to depression-inducing factors. The contribution of this paper is to propose a method for disentangling these two influences and to apply it to US data. The central conclusion of the paper was differences between men and women in rates of depression and anxiety were largely to be explained by differences in their responses to depression-inducing factors: the percentage contribution of inter-gender response differences to explaining the overall difference in inter-gender probabilities of being depressed was 93 percent for “sad, empty type depression”; 92 percent for “very discouraged” type depression; and 69 percent for “loss of interest” type depression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-4978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10902-009-9155-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHSOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Collaboration ; Cooperation ; Depression (Psychology) ; Econometrics ; Economics ; Epidemiology ; Gender differences ; Happiness ; Mental depression ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Philosophy ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Positive Psychology ; Psychiatry ; Quality of Life Research ; Research Paper ; Sex crimes ; Sex Differences ; Social Sciences ; Stress ; United States of America ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of happiness studies, 2010-12, Vol.11 (6), p.663-682</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-38b3cfbf1f375fa3ca90d3cd9286f40aafb194c61bc76fff2849eb991fdccda03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-38b3cfbf1f375fa3ca90d3cd9286f40aafb194c61bc76fff2849eb991fdccda03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/807458283/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/807458283?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,21373,21374,27321,27901,27902,33588,33589,33751,33752,34507,34508,36037,36038,43709,44091,44339,73964,74382,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borooah, Vani K.</creatorcontrib><title>Gender Differences in the Incidence of Depression and Anxiety: Econometric Evidence from the USA</title><title>Journal of happiness studies</title><addtitle>J Happiness Stud</addtitle><description>Using data from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) for the United States for the period 2001–2003, this paper addresses a vexed question relating to inter-gender differences in depression rates, namely how much of the observed difference in depression rates between men and women may be explained by differences between them in their exposure , and how much may be explained by differences between them in their response , to depression-inducing factors. The contribution of this paper is to propose a method for disentangling these two influences and to apply it to US data. The central conclusion of the paper was differences between men and women in rates of depression and anxiety were largely to be explained by differences in their responses to depression-inducing factors: the percentage contribution of inter-gender response differences to explaining the overall difference in inter-gender probabilities of being depressed was 93 percent for “sad, empty type depression”; 92 percent for “very discouraged” type depression; and 69 percent for “loss of interest” type depression.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Positive Psychology</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1389-4978</issn><issn>1573-7780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4soOKcfwFvw4imaNG2TeBvbnIOBB905pumLdqzJTDpx397WCoLg6T0ev_-fxy9JLim5oYTw20iJJCkmRGJJ8xxnR8mI5pxhzgU57nYmJM4kF6fJWYwb0oFFUYySlwW4CgKa1dZCAGcgotqh9g3Q0pm66i_IWzSDXYAYa--QdhWauM8a2sMdmhvvfANtqA2af_zwNvjmu2L9NDlPTqzeRrj4meNkfT9_nj7g1eNiOZ2ssGEZbzETJTO2tNQynlvNjJakYqaSqShsRrS2JZWZKWhpeGGtTUUmoZSS2sqYShM2Tq6H3l3w73uIrWrqaGC71Q78PipBBZe8yHvy6g-58fvguueUIDzLRSpYB9EBMsHHGMCqXagbHQ6KEtUbV4Nx1YlUvXGVdZl0yMSOda8Qfov_D30BDu2EHw</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Borooah, Vani K.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Gender Differences in the Incidence of Depression and Anxiety: Econometric Evidence from the USA</title><author>Borooah, Vani K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-38b3cfbf1f375fa3ca90d3cd9286f40aafb194c61bc76fff2849eb991fdccda03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Positive Psychology</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borooah, Vani K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of happiness studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borooah, Vani K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender Differences in the Incidence of Depression and Anxiety: Econometric Evidence from the USA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of happiness studies</jtitle><stitle>J Happiness Stud</stitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>663-682</pages><issn>1389-4978</issn><eissn>1573-7780</eissn><coden>JHSOAA</coden><abstract>Using data from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) for the United States for the period 2001–2003, this paper addresses a vexed question relating to inter-gender differences in depression rates, namely how much of the observed difference in depression rates between men and women may be explained by differences between them in their exposure , and how much may be explained by differences between them in their response , to depression-inducing factors. The contribution of this paper is to propose a method for disentangling these two influences and to apply it to US data. The central conclusion of the paper was differences between men and women in rates of depression and anxiety were largely to be explained by differences in their responses to depression-inducing factors: the percentage contribution of inter-gender response differences to explaining the overall difference in inter-gender probabilities of being depressed was 93 percent for “sad, empty type depression”; 92 percent for “very discouraged” type depression; and 69 percent for “loss of interest” type depression.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10902-009-9155-4</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-4978
ispartof Journal of happiness studies, 2010-12, Vol.11 (6), p.663-682
issn 1389-4978
1573-7780
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818797650
source EconLit s plnými texty; ABI/INFORM global; Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Anxiety
Collaboration
Cooperation
Depression (Psychology)
Econometrics
Economics
Epidemiology
Gender differences
Happiness
Mental depression
Mental disorders
Mental health
Personality and Social Psychology
Philosophy
Polls & surveys
Positive Psychology
Psychiatry
Quality of Life Research
Research Paper
Sex crimes
Sex Differences
Social Sciences
Stress
United States of America
Women
title Gender Differences in the Incidence of Depression and Anxiety: Econometric Evidence from the USA
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A53%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20Differences%20in%20the%20Incidence%20of%20Depression%20and%20Anxiety:%20Econometric%20Evidence%20from%20the%20USA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20happiness%20studies&rft.au=Borooah,%20Vani%20K.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=663-682&rft.issn=1389-4978&rft.eissn=1573-7780&rft.coden=JHSOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10902-009-9155-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2192680091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-38b3cfbf1f375fa3ca90d3cd9286f40aafb194c61bc76fff2849eb991fdccda03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807458283&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true