Loading…

Improving attitudes towards children with disabilities in a school context: a cluster randomized intervention study

Aim  Although inclusive education of disabled children is now an accepted practice, it is often challenged by negative peer attitudes. We undertook an interventional study aimed at improving students’ attitudes towards their disabled peers. Method  The participants were students from the 7th grade o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Developmental medicine and child neurology 2010-10, Vol.52 (10), p.e236-e242
Main Authors: GODEAU, EMMANUELLE, VIGNES, CÉLINE, SENTENAC, MARIANE, EHLINGER, VIRGINIE, NAVARRO, FÉLIX, GRANDJEAN, HÉLÈNE, ARNAUD, CATHERINE
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim  Although inclusive education of disabled children is now an accepted practice, it is often challenged by negative peer attitudes. We undertook an interventional study aimed at improving students’ attitudes towards their disabled peers. Method  The participants were students from the 7th grade of twelve paired schools (1509 students from 62 classes; age 12–13y), randomly allocated to an intervention group (205 males, 285 females) or a control group (132 males, 165 females). The intervention consisted of a mandatory comprehensive educational project on disability. The Chedoke‐McMaster Attitudes Towards Children with Handicaps Scale (CATCH) was used to assess children’s attitudes before (T0) and after (T1) intervention. The hierarchical structure of the data was taken into account by adjusting standard deviations and using linear multilevel models. Results  Seven hundred and eighty‐four students had at least one score on the three domains (cognitive, affective, behavioural) of the CATCH at T0 and T1. The final scores were higher than baseline scores (total scores, intervention group: baseline score 25.6 (SD=5.4), final score 26.8 (5.9), p
ISSN:0012-1622
1469-8749
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03731.x