Loading…

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review

In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2011, Vol.131 (1), p.101-110
Main Authors: Macpherson, Gavin J., Breusch, Steffen J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003
container_end_page 110
container_issue 1
container_start_page 101
container_title Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
container_volume 131
creator Macpherson, Gavin J.
Breusch, Steffen J.
description In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for the most frequent reasons for re-operations. Although the long-term consequences of metal ion release remain unknown, the increasing prevalence of soft tissue related problems with potentially devastating functional consequences in this younger patient group are of concern. Outcome after revision for metal wear related failure of MoMHR is poor. In our opinion, patients with this device should be managed in dedicated centers with facilities for data collection and monitoring. The majority of proposed advantages of MoMHR cannot be supported by the published evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822359845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2402241049</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7zIggdP0Zl8tI03WfwCxYueQ9pO1y677ZpsFf-9KV0VBE9JmOd9JzyMHSOcI0B6EQAUCA4IHFFLbnbYGJVUXBpMdtkYjEx4BhpH7CCEBQCKzMA-GwlIEh2zY4aPtHFL3jZ81V-mr_V66il0vnJF3cwvp25a-HpTF3Hm6b2mj0O2V7lloKPtOWEvN9fPszv-8HR7P7t64IVMccNLJJNC7kgnDkSmEpBUJRU50JJElZLM0OUmLbXTpnK5rFArJ5TWucpLADlhZ0Pv2rdvHYWNXdWhoOXSNdR2wWZCSG0ypSN5-odctJ1v4uesiH6EQlAmUjhQhW9D8FTZta9Xzn9aBNvrtINOC_076rR95mTb3OUrKn8S3_4iIAYgxFEzJ_-7-v_WL4ogfXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2402241049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Macpherson, Gavin J. ; Breusch, Steffen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, Gavin J. ; Breusch, Steffen J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for the most frequent reasons for re-operations. Although the long-term consequences of metal ion release remain unknown, the increasing prevalence of soft tissue related problems with potentially devastating functional consequences in this younger patient group are of concern. Outcome after revision for metal wear related failure of MoMHR is poor. In our opinion, patients with this device should be managed in dedicated centers with facilities for data collection and monitoring. The majority of proposed advantages of MoMHR cannot be supported by the published evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20665040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Cementation ; Femoral Neck Fractures - epidemiology ; Hip Arthroplasty ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metals ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2011, Vol.131 (1), p.101-110</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20665040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, Gavin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breusch, Steffen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for the most frequent reasons for re-operations. Although the long-term consequences of metal ion release remain unknown, the increasing prevalence of soft tissue related problems with potentially devastating functional consequences in this younger patient group are of concern. Outcome after revision for metal wear related failure of MoMHR is poor. In our opinion, patients with this device should be managed in dedicated centers with facilities for data collection and monitoring. The majority of proposed advantages of MoMHR cannot be supported by the published evidence.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Cementation</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hip Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7zIggdP0Zl8tI03WfwCxYueQ9pO1y677ZpsFf-9KV0VBE9JmOd9JzyMHSOcI0B6EQAUCA4IHFFLbnbYGJVUXBpMdtkYjEx4BhpH7CCEBQCKzMA-GwlIEh2zY4aPtHFL3jZ81V-mr_V66il0vnJF3cwvp25a-HpTF3Hm6b2mj0O2V7lloKPtOWEvN9fPszv-8HR7P7t64IVMccNLJJNC7kgnDkSmEpBUJRU50JJElZLM0OUmLbXTpnK5rFArJ5TWucpLADlhZ0Pv2rdvHYWNXdWhoOXSNdR2wWZCSG0ypSN5-odctJ1v4uesiH6EQlAmUjhQhW9D8FTZta9Xzn9aBNvrtINOC_076rR95mTb3OUrKn8S3_4iIAYgxFEzJ_-7-v_WL4ogfXA</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Macpherson, Gavin J.</creator><creator>Breusch, Steffen J.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review</title><author>Macpherson, Gavin J. ; Breusch, Steffen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Cementation</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hip Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, Gavin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breusch, Steffen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macpherson, Gavin J.</au><au>Breusch, Steffen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>101-110</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for the most frequent reasons for re-operations. Although the long-term consequences of metal ion release remain unknown, the increasing prevalence of soft tissue related problems with potentially devastating functional consequences in this younger patient group are of concern. Outcome after revision for metal wear related failure of MoMHR is poor. In our opinion, patients with this device should be managed in dedicated centers with facilities for data collection and monitoring. The majority of proposed advantages of MoMHR cannot be supported by the published evidence.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20665040</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-8051
ispartof Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2011, Vol.131 (1), p.101-110
issn 0936-8051
1434-3916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822359845
source Springer Link
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Cementation
Femoral Neck Fractures - epidemiology
Hip Arthroplasty
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metals
Orthopedics
Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery
Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
title Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A33%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metal-on-metal%20hip%20resurfacing:%20a%20critical%20review&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Macpherson,%20Gavin%20J.&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=101-110&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2402241049%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2402241049&rft_id=info:pmid/20665040&rfr_iscdi=true