Loading…
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review
In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2011, Vol.131 (1), p.101-110 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003 |
container_end_page | 110 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Macpherson, Gavin J. Breusch, Steffen J. |
description | In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for the most frequent reasons for re-operations. Although the long-term consequences of metal ion release remain unknown, the increasing prevalence of soft tissue related problems with potentially devastating functional consequences in this younger patient group are of concern. Outcome after revision for metal wear related failure of MoMHR is poor. In our opinion, patients with this device should be managed in dedicated centers with facilities for data collection and monitoring. The majority of proposed advantages of MoMHR cannot be supported by the published evidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822359845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2402241049</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7zIggdP0Zl8tI03WfwCxYueQ9pO1y677ZpsFf-9KV0VBE9JmOd9JzyMHSOcI0B6EQAUCA4IHFFLbnbYGJVUXBpMdtkYjEx4BhpH7CCEBQCKzMA-GwlIEh2zY4aPtHFL3jZ81V-mr_V66il0vnJF3cwvp25a-HpTF3Hm6b2mj0O2V7lloKPtOWEvN9fPszv-8HR7P7t64IVMccNLJJNC7kgnDkSmEpBUJRU50JJElZLM0OUmLbXTpnK5rFArJ5TWucpLADlhZ0Pv2rdvHYWNXdWhoOXSNdR2wWZCSG0ypSN5-odctJ1v4uesiH6EQlAmUjhQhW9D8FTZta9Xzn9aBNvrtINOC_076rR95mTb3OUrKn8S3_4iIAYgxFEzJ_-7-v_WL4ogfXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2402241049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Macpherson, Gavin J. ; Breusch, Steffen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, Gavin J. ; Breusch, Steffen J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for the most frequent reasons for re-operations. Although the long-term consequences of metal ion release remain unknown, the increasing prevalence of soft tissue related problems with potentially devastating functional consequences in this younger patient group are of concern. Outcome after revision for metal wear related failure of MoMHR is poor. In our opinion, patients with this device should be managed in dedicated centers with facilities for data collection and monitoring. The majority of proposed advantages of MoMHR cannot be supported by the published evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20665040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Cementation ; Femoral Neck Fractures - epidemiology ; Hip Arthroplasty ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metals ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2011, Vol.131 (1), p.101-110</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20665040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, Gavin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breusch, Steffen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for the most frequent reasons for re-operations. Although the long-term consequences of metal ion release remain unknown, the increasing prevalence of soft tissue related problems with potentially devastating functional consequences in this younger patient group are of concern. Outcome after revision for metal wear related failure of MoMHR is poor. In our opinion, patients with this device should be managed in dedicated centers with facilities for data collection and monitoring. The majority of proposed advantages of MoMHR cannot be supported by the published evidence.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Cementation</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hip Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7zIggdP0Zl8tI03WfwCxYueQ9pO1y677ZpsFf-9KV0VBE9JmOd9JzyMHSOcI0B6EQAUCA4IHFFLbnbYGJVUXBpMdtkYjEx4BhpH7CCEBQCKzMA-GwlIEh2zY4aPtHFL3jZ81V-mr_V66il0vnJF3cwvp25a-HpTF3Hm6b2mj0O2V7lloKPtOWEvN9fPszv-8HR7P7t64IVMccNLJJNC7kgnDkSmEpBUJRU50JJElZLM0OUmLbXTpnK5rFArJ5TWucpLADlhZ0Pv2rdvHYWNXdWhoOXSNdR2wWZCSG0ypSN5-odctJ1v4uesiH6EQlAmUjhQhW9D8FTZta9Xzn9aBNvrtINOC_076rR95mTb3OUrKn8S3_4iIAYgxFEzJ_-7-v_WL4ogfXA</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Macpherson, Gavin J.</creator><creator>Breusch, Steffen J.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review</title><author>Macpherson, Gavin J. ; Breusch, Steffen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Cementation</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hip Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, Gavin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breusch, Steffen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macpherson, Gavin J.</au><au>Breusch, Steffen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>101-110</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for the most frequent reasons for re-operations. Although the long-term consequences of metal ion release remain unknown, the increasing prevalence of soft tissue related problems with potentially devastating functional consequences in this younger patient group are of concern. Outcome after revision for metal wear related failure of MoMHR is poor. In our opinion, patients with this device should be managed in dedicated centers with facilities for data collection and monitoring. The majority of proposed advantages of MoMHR cannot be supported by the published evidence.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20665040</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-8051 |
ispartof | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2011, Vol.131 (1), p.101-110 |
issn | 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822359845 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods Cementation Femoral Neck Fractures - epidemiology Hip Arthroplasty Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metals Orthopedics Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Failure Reoperation - statistics & numerical data |
title | Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A33%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metal-on-metal%20hip%20resurfacing:%20a%20critical%20review&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Macpherson,%20Gavin%20J.&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=101-110&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2402241049%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d1e970bae56a0284603ef6fea053e2f7e381ab97d5a59fab3f154a2455b4bd003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2402241049&rft_id=info:pmid/20665040&rfr_iscdi=true |