Renewable energy from gasification of manure: an innovative technology in search of fertile policy

After describing an innovative technology, the close-coupled gasification and cyclonic combustor, this article explores the policy issues that inhibit a superior sustainable solution from flourishing. Discussion of technology includes defining biomass, explaining what biomass to energy means, what t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 2003-05, Vol.84 (1-2), p.111-127
Main Authors: Buckley, John C, Schwarz, Peter M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alternative energy sources
Animal manures
Animals
Animals, Domestic
Bioelectric Energy Sources
Biomass
Conservation of Natural Resources
Energy
Energy policy
Environment
Environmental monitoring
Gasification
Livestock
Livestock production
Management
Manure
Manures
Nitrogen
Policies
Policy Making
Renewable energy
Renewable resources
Searching
Sustainability
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:After describing an innovative technology, the close-coupled gasification and cyclonic combustor, this article explores the policy issues that inhibit a superior sustainable solution from flourishing. Discussion of technology includes defining biomass, explaining what biomass to energy means, what the advantages of biomass to energy are, and why gasification is a superior biomass to energy technology. Specifically the environmental benefits of alternatives to landspreading of traditional manure management are discussed, as well as the advantages of gasification versus traditional combustion techniques for high nitrogen fuels. The policy environment is explored, particularly regarding sustainability, manure management, and renewable energy. Artificial, non-sustainable barriers to renewable energy, and the impact of wide jurisdictional variability are discussed. North Carolina is identified as a unique jurisdiction to monitor because of its high volume of livestock manure, and laggard position in renewable energy advocacy. The authors contend that these two positions are unsustainable, and that pressures can be expected to force the state to modify its renewable energy policies or risk losing market share in livestock production to more pro-sustainable policy oriented states.
ISSN:0167-6369
1573-2959
DOI:10.1023/A:1022847416139