Loading…
Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time
ABSTRACT Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exert...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychophysiology 1975-01, Vol.12 (1), p.74-78 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3 |
container_end_page | 78 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 74 |
container_title | Psychophysiology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Papakostopolous, Demetrios Fenelon, Bernard |
description | ABSTRACT
Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exerted through fixation techniques coupled with mechanical and electro‐oculographic monitoring of movement. Analysis of single‐trial data gave an intra‐individual picture of correlation apparently in conflict with the across picture gained from averages. A rationalization is attempted of these results and some evidence is offered that, in the individual S, a negative and probably nonlinear relationship holds between CNV amplitude and RT. Analysis of average data demonstrates the distribution of CNV across the scalp and shows a lack of correlation between CNV and RT in prefrontal areas, in contrast with that found in central‐parietal areas. It is suggested that the CNV is an index of functionally different processes in these areas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82740971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>82740971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkcFv0zAYxS0EGt3gT0CyOKBxSLBjJ7Y5II3ABmIqY60GnCwn_bK5pElnu1v33-Mm1Tjji2W_33uf_IzQa0pSGte7ZUp5oRKpZJFSJfI0VISRIk-3T9DkUXqKJoRwmeRCZM_RofdLQoiiWXaADmIKzyibIDdbm2BNiz9ZH5ytNsH2He4bHG4Al30XbHcNXcBTuI7cHeAr46wZoONyevUWm24xsJfQDtf-xq5xBeEeoMORGIBLMPXgmdsVvEDPGtN6eLnfj9D89PO8_JKcfz_7Wp6cJzUngifcMCEMyRSvclU0pBKMN7JWRhGVSxkfsMhkwTjlXC4aVlR5PGdG1mAE1A07Qm_G2LXrbzfgg15ZX0Pbmg76jdcyE5woQSP4fgRr13vvoNFrZ1fGPWhK9K5vvdS7UvWuVL3rW-_71ttofrWfsqlWsPhnHQuO-odRv7ctPPxHsr6Y_b4QPAYkY0D8H9g-Bhj3RxeCRcfP6Zme_5iVH7-Vv7RkfwF41Z9R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>82740971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time</title><source>Wiley Online Library Psychology Backfiles</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO)</source><creator>Papakostopolous, Demetrios ; Fenelon, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Papakostopolous, Demetrios ; Fenelon, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exerted through fixation techniques coupled with mechanical and electro‐oculographic monitoring of movement. Analysis of single‐trial data gave an intra‐individual picture of correlation apparently in conflict with the across picture gained from averages. A rationalization is attempted of these results and some evidence is offered that, in the individual S, a negative and probably nonlinear relationship holds between CNV amplitude and RT. Analysis of average data demonstrates the distribution of CNV across the scalp and shows a lack of correlation between CNV and RT in prefrontal areas, in contrast with that found in central‐parietal areas. It is suggested that the CNV is an index of functionally different processes in these areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1114213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>CNV ; Computers ; Contingent Negative Variation ; Electromyography ; Electrooculography ; Electrophysiology ; Fixation, Ocular ; Frontal Lobe - physiology ; Humans ; Parietal Lobe - physiology ; Reaction Time</subject><ispartof>Psychophysiology, 1975-01, Vol.12 (1), p.74-78</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,50850,50959</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1114213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papakostopolous, Demetrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time</title><title>Psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exerted through fixation techniques coupled with mechanical and electro‐oculographic monitoring of movement. Analysis of single‐trial data gave an intra‐individual picture of correlation apparently in conflict with the across picture gained from averages. A rationalization is attempted of these results and some evidence is offered that, in the individual S, a negative and probably nonlinear relationship holds between CNV amplitude and RT. Analysis of average data demonstrates the distribution of CNV across the scalp and shows a lack of correlation between CNV and RT in prefrontal areas, in contrast with that found in central‐parietal areas. It is suggested that the CNV is an index of functionally different processes in these areas.</description><subject>CNV</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Contingent Negative Variation</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Electrooculography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Frontal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Parietal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><issn>0048-5772</issn><issn>1469-8986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkcFv0zAYxS0EGt3gT0CyOKBxSLBjJ7Y5II3ABmIqY60GnCwn_bK5pElnu1v33-Mm1Tjji2W_33uf_IzQa0pSGte7ZUp5oRKpZJFSJfI0VISRIk-3T9DkUXqKJoRwmeRCZM_RofdLQoiiWXaADmIKzyibIDdbm2BNiz9ZH5ytNsH2He4bHG4Al30XbHcNXcBTuI7cHeAr46wZoONyevUWm24xsJfQDtf-xq5xBeEeoMORGIBLMPXgmdsVvEDPGtN6eLnfj9D89PO8_JKcfz_7Wp6cJzUngifcMCEMyRSvclU0pBKMN7JWRhGVSxkfsMhkwTjlXC4aVlR5PGdG1mAE1A07Qm_G2LXrbzfgg15ZX0Pbmg76jdcyE5woQSP4fgRr13vvoNFrZ1fGPWhK9K5vvdS7UvWuVL3rW-_71ttofrWfsqlWsPhnHQuO-odRv7ctPPxHsr6Y_b4QPAYkY0D8H9g-Bhj3RxeCRcfP6Zme_5iVH7-Vv7RkfwF41Z9R</recordid><startdate>197501</startdate><enddate>197501</enddate><creator>Papakostopolous, Demetrios</creator><creator>Fenelon, Bernard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197501</creationdate><title>Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time</title><author>Papakostopolous, Demetrios ; Fenelon, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>CNV</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Contingent Negative Variation</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Electrooculography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Frontal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Parietal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papakostopolous, Demetrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papakostopolous, Demetrios</au><au>Fenelon, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time</atitle><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><date>1975-01</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>74-78</pages><issn>0048-5772</issn><eissn>1469-8986</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exerted through fixation techniques coupled with mechanical and electro‐oculographic monitoring of movement. Analysis of single‐trial data gave an intra‐individual picture of correlation apparently in conflict with the across picture gained from averages. A rationalization is attempted of these results and some evidence is offered that, in the individual S, a negative and probably nonlinear relationship holds between CNV amplitude and RT. Analysis of average data demonstrates the distribution of CNV across the scalp and shows a lack of correlation between CNV and RT in prefrontal areas, in contrast with that found in central‐parietal areas. It is suggested that the CNV is an index of functionally different processes in these areas.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>1114213</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-5772 |
ispartof | Psychophysiology, 1975-01, Vol.12 (1), p.74-78 |
issn | 0048-5772 1469-8986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82740971 |
source | Wiley Online Library Psychology Backfiles; SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO) |
subjects | CNV Computers Contingent Negative Variation Electromyography Electrooculography Electrophysiology Fixation, Ocular Frontal Lobe - physiology Humans Parietal Lobe - physiology Reaction Time |
title | Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20Distribution%20of%20the%20Contingent%20Negative%20Variation%20(CNV)%20and%20the%20Relationship%20between%20CNV%20and%20Reaction%20Time&rft.jtitle=Psychophysiology&rft.au=Papakostopolous,%20Demetrios&rft.date=1975-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=74-78&rft.issn=0048-5772&rft.eissn=1469-8986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E82740971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=82740971&rft_id=info:pmid/1114213&rfr_iscdi=true |