Loading…

Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time

ABSTRACT Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exert...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychophysiology 1975-01, Vol.12 (1), p.74-78
Main Authors: Papakostopolous, Demetrios, Fenelon, Bernard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3
container_end_page 78
container_issue 1
container_start_page 74
container_title Psychophysiology
container_volume 12
creator Papakostopolous, Demetrios
Fenelon, Bernard
description ABSTRACT Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exerted through fixation techniques coupled with mechanical and electro‐oculographic monitoring of movement. Analysis of single‐trial data gave an intra‐individual picture of correlation apparently in conflict with the across picture gained from averages. A rationalization is attempted of these results and some evidence is offered that, in the individual S, a negative and probably nonlinear relationship holds between CNV amplitude and RT. Analysis of average data demonstrates the distribution of CNV across the scalp and shows a lack of correlation between CNV and RT in prefrontal areas, in contrast with that found in central‐parietal areas. It is suggested that the CNV is an index of functionally different processes in these areas.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82740971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>82740971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkcFv0zAYxS0EGt3gT0CyOKBxSLBjJ7Y5II3ABmIqY60GnCwn_bK5pElnu1v33-Mm1Tjji2W_33uf_IzQa0pSGte7ZUp5oRKpZJFSJfI0VISRIk-3T9DkUXqKJoRwmeRCZM_RofdLQoiiWXaADmIKzyibIDdbm2BNiz9ZH5ytNsH2He4bHG4Al30XbHcNXcBTuI7cHeAr46wZoONyevUWm24xsJfQDtf-xq5xBeEeoMORGIBLMPXgmdsVvEDPGtN6eLnfj9D89PO8_JKcfz_7Wp6cJzUngifcMCEMyRSvclU0pBKMN7JWRhGVSxkfsMhkwTjlXC4aVlR5PGdG1mAE1A07Qm_G2LXrbzfgg15ZX0Pbmg76jdcyE5woQSP4fgRr13vvoNFrZ1fGPWhK9K5vvdS7UvWuVL3rW-_71ttofrWfsqlWsPhnHQuO-odRv7ctPPxHsr6Y_b4QPAYkY0D8H9g-Bhj3RxeCRcfP6Zme_5iVH7-Vv7RkfwF41Z9R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>82740971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time</title><source>Wiley Online Library Psychology Backfiles</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO)</source><creator>Papakostopolous, Demetrios ; Fenelon, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Papakostopolous, Demetrios ; Fenelon, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exerted through fixation techniques coupled with mechanical and electro‐oculographic monitoring of movement. Analysis of single‐trial data gave an intra‐individual picture of correlation apparently in conflict with the across picture gained from averages. A rationalization is attempted of these results and some evidence is offered that, in the individual S, a negative and probably nonlinear relationship holds between CNV amplitude and RT. Analysis of average data demonstrates the distribution of CNV across the scalp and shows a lack of correlation between CNV and RT in prefrontal areas, in contrast with that found in central‐parietal areas. It is suggested that the CNV is an index of functionally different processes in these areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1114213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>CNV ; Computers ; Contingent Negative Variation ; Electromyography ; Electrooculography ; Electrophysiology ; Fixation, Ocular ; Frontal Lobe - physiology ; Humans ; Parietal Lobe - physiology ; Reaction Time</subject><ispartof>Psychophysiology, 1975-01, Vol.12 (1), p.74-78</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,50850,50959</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1114213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papakostopolous, Demetrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time</title><title>Psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exerted through fixation techniques coupled with mechanical and electro‐oculographic monitoring of movement. Analysis of single‐trial data gave an intra‐individual picture of correlation apparently in conflict with the across picture gained from averages. A rationalization is attempted of these results and some evidence is offered that, in the individual S, a negative and probably nonlinear relationship holds between CNV amplitude and RT. Analysis of average data demonstrates the distribution of CNV across the scalp and shows a lack of correlation between CNV and RT in prefrontal areas, in contrast with that found in central‐parietal areas. It is suggested that the CNV is an index of functionally different processes in these areas.</description><subject>CNV</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Contingent Negative Variation</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Electrooculography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Frontal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Parietal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><issn>0048-5772</issn><issn>1469-8986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkcFv0zAYxS0EGt3gT0CyOKBxSLBjJ7Y5II3ABmIqY60GnCwn_bK5pElnu1v33-Mm1Tjji2W_33uf_IzQa0pSGte7ZUp5oRKpZJFSJfI0VISRIk-3T9DkUXqKJoRwmeRCZM_RofdLQoiiWXaADmIKzyibIDdbm2BNiz9ZH5ytNsH2He4bHG4Al30XbHcNXcBTuI7cHeAr46wZoONyevUWm24xsJfQDtf-xq5xBeEeoMORGIBLMPXgmdsVvEDPGtN6eLnfj9D89PO8_JKcfz_7Wp6cJzUngifcMCEMyRSvclU0pBKMN7JWRhGVSxkfsMhkwTjlXC4aVlR5PGdG1mAE1A07Qm_G2LXrbzfgg15ZX0Pbmg76jdcyE5woQSP4fgRr13vvoNFrZ1fGPWhK9K5vvdS7UvWuVL3rW-_71ttofrWfsqlWsPhnHQuO-odRv7ctPPxHsr6Y_b4QPAYkY0D8H9g-Bhj3RxeCRcfP6Zme_5iVH7-Vv7RkfwF41Z9R</recordid><startdate>197501</startdate><enddate>197501</enddate><creator>Papakostopolous, Demetrios</creator><creator>Fenelon, Bernard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197501</creationdate><title>Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time</title><author>Papakostopolous, Demetrios ; Fenelon, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>CNV</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Contingent Negative Variation</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Electrooculography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Frontal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Parietal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papakostopolous, Demetrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papakostopolous, Demetrios</au><au>Fenelon, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time</atitle><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><date>1975-01</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>74-78</pages><issn>0048-5772</issn><eissn>1469-8986</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Multichannel recording of scalp CNV (Contingent Negative Variation) and RT (Reaction Time) was carried out on 12 normal adult Ss in a fixed foreperiod RT experiment. Single trial responses were stored on digital tape and averaged off‐line. Strict control over eye movement artifact was exerted through fixation techniques coupled with mechanical and electro‐oculographic monitoring of movement. Analysis of single‐trial data gave an intra‐individual picture of correlation apparently in conflict with the across picture gained from averages. A rationalization is attempted of these results and some evidence is offered that, in the individual S, a negative and probably nonlinear relationship holds between CNV amplitude and RT. Analysis of average data demonstrates the distribution of CNV across the scalp and shows a lack of correlation between CNV and RT in prefrontal areas, in contrast with that found in central‐parietal areas. It is suggested that the CNV is an index of functionally different processes in these areas.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>1114213</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5772
ispartof Psychophysiology, 1975-01, Vol.12 (1), p.74-78
issn 0048-5772
1469-8986
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82740971
source Wiley Online Library Psychology Backfiles; SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO)
subjects CNV
Computers
Contingent Negative Variation
Electromyography
Electrooculography
Electrophysiology
Fixation, Ocular
Frontal Lobe - physiology
Humans
Parietal Lobe - physiology
Reaction Time
title Spatial Distribution of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Relationship between CNV and Reaction Time
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20Distribution%20of%20the%20Contingent%20Negative%20Variation%20(CNV)%20and%20the%20Relationship%20between%20CNV%20and%20Reaction%20Time&rft.jtitle=Psychophysiology&rft.au=Papakostopolous,%20Demetrios&rft.date=1975-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=74-78&rft.issn=0048-5772&rft.eissn=1469-8986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03065.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E82740971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-4a377a0294b596f0b734f8c9a909588114d286341448df36b5d282a8cea7ecf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=82740971&rft_id=info:pmid/1114213&rfr_iscdi=true