Loading…
A comparison of in-class and online quizzes on student exam performance
THIS STUDY evaluated the use of Web-based assessment in the instruction of students enrolled in a Theories of Personality class. During 1999, we compared 297 undergraduates who took online quizzes with 291 undergraduates who took traditional paper-and-pencil quizzes. All online quizzes were generate...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of computing in higher education 2003-03, Vol.14 (2), p.121-134 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-f28a9a0dcc49daad497ea11475ca268de4779009339b69fc1b4dd95955c7a5f23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-f28a9a0dcc49daad497ea11475ca268de4779009339b69fc1b4dd95955c7a5f23 |
container_end_page | 134 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | Journal of computing in higher education |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | DeSouza, Eros Fleming, Matthew |
description | THIS STUDY evaluated the use of Web-based assessment in the instruction of students enrolled in a Theories of Personality class. During 1999, we compared 297 undergraduates who took online quizzes with 291 undergraduates who took traditional paper-and-pencil quizzes. All online quizzes were generated and maintained by the class instructor using Mallard (an asynchronous Web-based assessment program), which allowed students to choose when, where, and how long to work on their quizzes. Mallard students performed significantly better on achievement criteria (four inclass exams) than non-Mallard students. Survey data indicated that most students reported being "very satisfied" with Mallard. These findings followed similar trends in other forms of computer-assisted instruction. Future research and potential pedagogical applications of Web-based assessment are discussed. Despite the initial time investment required to generate online quizzes with Mallard, student and instructor experiences with the program suggest that it is a promising technology for enhancing instruction in higher education.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02940941 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_831183353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>831183353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-f28a9a0dcc49daad497ea11475ca268de4779009339b69fc1b4dd95955c7a5f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEYhIMoWKsXf0HwIgirb742ybGWtgoFL3pe0iQLW3aTbbIL2l_vSgXB08zAwzAMQrcEHgmAfHpeA9UcNCdnaEZUKQtCGTufPHBaEEnLS3SV8x6AgWJ6hjYLbGPXm9TkGHCscRMK25qcsQkOx9A2wePD2ByPPk8R52F0PgzYf5oO9z7VMXUmWH-NLmrTZn_zq3P0sV69L1-K7dvmdbnYFpaCGIqaKqMNOGu5dsY4rqU3hHAprKGlcp5LqQE0Y3pX6tqSHXdOCy2ElUbUlM3R_am3T_Ew-jxUXZOtb1sTfBxzpRghijHBJvLuH7mPYwrTuEoKpQhoKCfo4QTZFHNOvq761HQmfVUEqp9Hq79H2Tej2GdI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>758810906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of in-class and online quizzes on student exam performance</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>DeSouza, Eros ; Fleming, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>DeSouza, Eros ; Fleming, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>THIS STUDY evaluated the use of Web-based assessment in the instruction of students enrolled in a Theories of Personality class. During 1999, we compared 297 undergraduates who took online quizzes with 291 undergraduates who took traditional paper-and-pencil quizzes. All online quizzes were generated and maintained by the class instructor using Mallard (an asynchronous Web-based assessment program), which allowed students to choose when, where, and how long to work on their quizzes. Mallard students performed significantly better on achievement criteria (four inclass exams) than non-Mallard students. Survey data indicated that most students reported being "very satisfied" with Mallard. These findings followed similar trends in other forms of computer-assisted instruction. Future research and potential pedagogical applications of Web-based assessment are discussed. Despite the initial time investment required to generate online quizzes with Mallard, student and instructor experiences with the program suggest that it is a promising technology for enhancing instruction in higher education.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1726</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-1233</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02940941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Education ; Higher education ; Instructors ; Investment ; On-line systems ; Online ; Students ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Students ; World Wide Web</subject><ispartof>Journal of computing in higher education, 2003-03, Vol.14 (2), p.121-134</ispartof><rights>Springer 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-f28a9a0dcc49daad497ea11475ca268de4779009339b69fc1b4dd95955c7a5f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-f28a9a0dcc49daad497ea11475ca268de4779009339b69fc1b4dd95955c7a5f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/758810906/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/758810906?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,43733,43880,74221,74397</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeSouza, Eros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of in-class and online quizzes on student exam performance</title><title>Journal of computing in higher education</title><description>THIS STUDY evaluated the use of Web-based assessment in the instruction of students enrolled in a Theories of Personality class. During 1999, we compared 297 undergraduates who took online quizzes with 291 undergraduates who took traditional paper-and-pencil quizzes. All online quizzes were generated and maintained by the class instructor using Mallard (an asynchronous Web-based assessment program), which allowed students to choose when, where, and how long to work on their quizzes. Mallard students performed significantly better on achievement criteria (four inclass exams) than non-Mallard students. Survey data indicated that most students reported being "very satisfied" with Mallard. These findings followed similar trends in other forms of computer-assisted instruction. Future research and potential pedagogical applications of Web-based assessment are discussed. Despite the initial time investment required to generate online quizzes with Mallard, student and instructor experiences with the program suggest that it is a promising technology for enhancing instruction in higher education.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Instructors</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>On-line systems</subject><subject>Online</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>World Wide Web</subject><issn>1042-1726</issn><issn>1867-1233</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEYhIMoWKsXf0HwIgirb742ybGWtgoFL3pe0iQLW3aTbbIL2l_vSgXB08zAwzAMQrcEHgmAfHpeA9UcNCdnaEZUKQtCGTufPHBaEEnLS3SV8x6AgWJ6hjYLbGPXm9TkGHCscRMK25qcsQkOx9A2wePD2ByPPk8R52F0PgzYf5oO9z7VMXUmWH-NLmrTZn_zq3P0sV69L1-K7dvmdbnYFpaCGIqaKqMNOGu5dsY4rqU3hHAprKGlcp5LqQE0Y3pX6tqSHXdOCy2ElUbUlM3R_am3T_Ew-jxUXZOtb1sTfBxzpRghijHBJvLuH7mPYwrTuEoKpQhoKCfo4QTZFHNOvq761HQmfVUEqp9Hq79H2Tej2GdI</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>DeSouza, Eros</creator><creator>Fleming, Matthew</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>A comparison of in-class and online quizzes on student exam performance</title><author>DeSouza, Eros ; Fleming, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-f28a9a0dcc49daad497ea11475ca268de4779009339b69fc1b4dd95955c7a5f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Instructors</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>On-line systems</topic><topic>Online</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>World Wide Web</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeSouza, Eros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of computing in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeSouza, Eros</au><au>Fleming, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of in-class and online quizzes on student exam performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computing in higher education</jtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>121-134</pages><issn>1042-1726</issn><eissn>1867-1233</eissn><abstract>THIS STUDY evaluated the use of Web-based assessment in the instruction of students enrolled in a Theories of Personality class. During 1999, we compared 297 undergraduates who took online quizzes with 291 undergraduates who took traditional paper-and-pencil quizzes. All online quizzes were generated and maintained by the class instructor using Mallard (an asynchronous Web-based assessment program), which allowed students to choose when, where, and how long to work on their quizzes. Mallard students performed significantly better on achievement criteria (four inclass exams) than non-Mallard students. Survey data indicated that most students reported being "very satisfied" with Mallard. These findings followed similar trends in other forms of computer-assisted instruction. Future research and potential pedagogical applications of Web-based assessment are discussed. Despite the initial time investment required to generate online quizzes with Mallard, student and instructor experiences with the program suggest that it is a promising technology for enhancing instruction in higher education.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02940941</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1726 |
ispartof | Journal of computing in higher education, 2003-03, Vol.14 (2), p.121-134 |
issn | 1042-1726 1867-1233 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_831183353 |
source | Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Link |
subjects | Assessments Education Higher education Instructors Investment On-line systems Online Students Teaching Methods Undergraduate Students World Wide Web |
title | A comparison of in-class and online quizzes on student exam performance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A55%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20in-class%20and%20online%20quizzes%20on%20student%20exam%20performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computing%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=DeSouza,%20Eros&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=121-134&rft.issn=1042-1726&rft.eissn=1867-1233&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02940941&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E831183353%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-f28a9a0dcc49daad497ea11475ca268de4779009339b69fc1b4dd95955c7a5f23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=758810906&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |