Loading…

Telegrams to Washington

This article argues that state legislative memorials to Congress are an underutilized tool in the study of federalism. A data set composed of the 4,119 memorials submitted to Congress from 1987 to 2006 was constructed to study the evolution of state priorities in intergovernmental policy and to exam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:State & local government review 2010-12, Vol.42 (3), p.235-245
Main Authors: Leckrone, J Wesley, Gollob, Justin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1114-fc687d413c68e93044fb793b461f14da27038235ada8b5a9e1d7a361c871f0a3
cites
container_end_page 245
container_issue 3
container_start_page 235
container_title State & local government review
container_volume 42
creator Leckrone, J Wesley
Gollob, Justin
description This article argues that state legislative memorials to Congress are an underutilized tool in the study of federalism. A data set composed of the 4,119 memorials submitted to Congress from 1987 to 2006 was constructed to study the evolution of state priorities in intergovernmental policy and to examine attitudes toward state-federal relations. Analysis shows that memorials have been used by every state legislature to send substantive policy signals to Washington across a wide range of issues. The article concludes that the inclusion of memorials into the study of intergovernmental relations provides researchers rich insight into unexplored issues critical to our understanding of federalism. Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0160323X10384747
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_837452304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>837452166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1114-fc687d413c68e93044fb793b461f14da27038235ada8b5a9e1d7a361c871f0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjs1qwkAURmdRwZ92rUt3XaWdO_dm7mRZxKogdBNod3KTzKglJq0T378R-wCuDhw-Dp9SM9AvAMyvGqxGg1-g0RETP6jRVSVXN1TjGL-1JkQ0IzXNfe33ZznFedfOPyUejs2-a5tHNQhSR__0z4nK35f5Yp1sP1abxds2KQGAklBaxxUB9vQZaqJQcIYFWQhAlRjuLxhMpRJXpJJ5qFjQQukYghacqOdb9ufc_l587HanYyx9XUvj20vcOWRKTd-9cwnW4h-q_Uib</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>837452166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Telegrams to Washington</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Leckrone, J Wesley ; Gollob, Justin</creator><creatorcontrib>Leckrone, J Wesley ; Gollob, Justin</creatorcontrib><description>This article argues that state legislative memorials to Congress are an underutilized tool in the study of federalism. A data set composed of the 4,119 memorials submitted to Congress from 1987 to 2006 was constructed to study the evolution of state priorities in intergovernmental policy and to examine attitudes toward state-federal relations. Analysis shows that memorials have been used by every state legislature to send substantive policy signals to Washington across a wide range of issues. The article concludes that the inclusion of memorials into the study of intergovernmental relations provides researchers rich insight into unexplored issues critical to our understanding of federalism. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-323X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0160323X10384747</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Attitudes ; Federalism ; Intergovernmental Relations ; Legislation ; Legislative Bodies ; Legislatures ; Memorials ; State government ; United States Congress</subject><ispartof>State &amp; local government review, 2010-12, Vol.42 (3), p.235-245</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1114-fc687d413c68e93044fb793b461f14da27038235ada8b5a9e1d7a361c871f0a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leckrone, J Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gollob, Justin</creatorcontrib><title>Telegrams to Washington</title><title>State &amp; local government review</title><description>This article argues that state legislative memorials to Congress are an underutilized tool in the study of federalism. A data set composed of the 4,119 memorials submitted to Congress from 1987 to 2006 was constructed to study the evolution of state priorities in intergovernmental policy and to examine attitudes toward state-federal relations. Analysis shows that memorials have been used by every state legislature to send substantive policy signals to Washington across a wide range of issues. The article concludes that the inclusion of memorials into the study of intergovernmental relations provides researchers rich insight into unexplored issues critical to our understanding of federalism. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Intergovernmental Relations</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislative Bodies</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Memorials</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>United States Congress</subject><issn>0160-323X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjs1qwkAURmdRwZ92rUt3XaWdO_dm7mRZxKogdBNod3KTzKglJq0T378R-wCuDhw-Dp9SM9AvAMyvGqxGg1-g0RETP6jRVSVXN1TjGL-1JkQ0IzXNfe33ZznFedfOPyUejs2-a5tHNQhSR__0z4nK35f5Yp1sP1abxds2KQGAklBaxxUB9vQZaqJQcIYFWQhAlRjuLxhMpRJXpJJ5qFjQQukYghacqOdb9ufc_l587HanYyx9XUvj20vcOWRKTd-9cwnW4h-q_Uib</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Leckrone, J Wesley</creator><creator>Gollob, Justin</creator><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Telegrams to Washington</title><author>Leckrone, J Wesley ; Gollob, Justin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1114-fc687d413c68e93044fb793b461f14da27038235ada8b5a9e1d7a361c871f0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Intergovernmental Relations</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislative Bodies</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Memorials</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>United States Congress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leckrone, J Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gollob, Justin</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>State &amp; local government review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leckrone, J Wesley</au><au>Gollob, Justin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Telegrams to Washington</atitle><jtitle>State &amp; local government review</jtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>245</epage><pages>235-245</pages><issn>0160-323X</issn><abstract>This article argues that state legislative memorials to Congress are an underutilized tool in the study of federalism. A data set composed of the 4,119 memorials submitted to Congress from 1987 to 2006 was constructed to study the evolution of state priorities in intergovernmental policy and to examine attitudes toward state-federal relations. Analysis shows that memorials have been used by every state legislature to send substantive policy signals to Washington across a wide range of issues. The article concludes that the inclusion of memorials into the study of intergovernmental relations provides researchers rich insight into unexplored issues critical to our understanding of federalism. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><doi>10.1177/0160323X10384747</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-323X
ispartof State & local government review, 2010-12, Vol.42 (3), p.235-245
issn 0160-323X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_837452304
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals Online
subjects Attitudes
Federalism
Intergovernmental Relations
Legislation
Legislative Bodies
Legislatures
Memorials
State government
United States Congress
title Telegrams to Washington
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Telegrams%20to%20Washington&rft.jtitle=State%20&%20local%20government%20review&rft.au=Leckrone,%20J%20Wesley&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=245&rft.pages=235-245&rft.issn=0160-323X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0160323X10384747&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E837452166%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1114-fc687d413c68e93044fb793b461f14da27038235ada8b5a9e1d7a361c871f0a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=837452166&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true