Loading…
Is Russia Succeeding in Central Asia?
On a number of recent occasions, the top Russian leadership has expressed its special interest in the affairs of former Soviet republics, including the assertion that Russia has a “privileged” relationship with these now independent states. 1 1 On Russian Channel One television on August 31, 2008, P...
Saved in:
Published in: | Orbis (Philadelphia) 2010, Vol.54 (4), p.615-629 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-b9b4c3a17f95eff8928400a8ab1216d469a9bbf9dcdba6d4f547a6ecc077247c3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 629 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 615 |
container_title | Orbis (Philadelphia) |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Spechler, Martin C. Spechler, Dina R. |
description | On a number of recent occasions, the top Russian leadership has expressed its special interest in the affairs of former Soviet republics, including the assertion that Russia has a “privileged” relationship with these now independent states.
1
1
On Russian Channel One television on August 31, 2008, President Dmitri Medvedev referred to his country's “privileged interests” [
privilegirovannie interesi] in
unspecified regions, similar to other countries’ special interests. In his summary for the Diplomatic Yearbook for 2008 Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov “mutually privileged relations” based on “cultural/civilizational unity” with all the countries of the CIS, but specifically denied that this amounted to a “sphere of influence.” Cf. Dmitri Trenin, “Russia's Spheres of
Interest, not
Influence,” The Washington Quarterly, October 2009.
Is this a claim of accomplished fact, of future intention, or perhaps an empty expression of nostalgia for lost status? As we see it, the record of Russian actions in the largest group of these states—the five of Central Asia—allows us to exclude the first and question whether the second is realizable. Russia must contend with the aspirations of those states themselves, as well as the determined interests of China and, to a lesser extent, the West. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.orbis.2010.07.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_838970235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0030438710000475</els_id><sourcerecordid>838970235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-b9b4c3a17f95eff8928400a8ab1216d469a9bbf9dcdba6d4f547a6ecc077247c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Ai9FEE-tk6RtkoPIsvgFC4If55CkiaR02zVpBf-9WdeTBz0NM_O8A_MgdIqhwIDry7YYgvaxIJAmwAoAvodmmDOaV4STfTQDoJCXlLNDdBRjCwA4bWbo_CFmT1OMXmXPkzHWNr5_y3yfLW0_BtVli7S6PkYHTnXRnvzUOXq9vXlZ3uerx7uH5WKVGwpizLXQpaEKMycq6xwXhJcAiiuNCa6bshZKaO1EYxqtUu-qkqnaGgOMkZIZOkcXu7ubMLxPNo5y7aOxXad6O0xRcsoFA0Krf0lWcYy5qFkiz36R7TCFPr2RICxEhRlNEN1BJgwxBuvkJvi1Cp8Sg9wqlq38Viy3iiUwmRSn1NUuZZOTD2-DjMbb3iSJwZpRNoP_M_8FY0SDPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751995173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Russia Succeeding in Central Asia?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Spechler, Martin C. ; Spechler, Dina R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spechler, Martin C. ; Spechler, Dina R.</creatorcontrib><description>On a number of recent occasions, the top Russian leadership has expressed its special interest in the affairs of former Soviet republics, including the assertion that Russia has a “privileged” relationship with these now independent states.
1
1
On Russian Channel One television on August 31, 2008, President Dmitri Medvedev referred to his country's “privileged interests” [
privilegirovannie interesi] in
unspecified regions, similar to other countries’ special interests. In his summary for the Diplomatic Yearbook for 2008 Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov “mutually privileged relations” based on “cultural/civilizational unity” with all the countries of the CIS, but specifically denied that this amounted to a “sphere of influence.” Cf. Dmitri Trenin, “Russia's Spheres of
Interest, not
Influence,” The Washington Quarterly, October 2009.
Is this a claim of accomplished fact, of future intention, or perhaps an empty expression of nostalgia for lost status? As we see it, the record of Russian actions in the largest group of these states—the five of Central Asia—allows us to exclude the first and question whether the second is realizable. Russia must contend with the aspirations of those states themselves, as well as the determined interests of China and, to a lesser extent, the West.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-4387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.orbis.2010.07.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ORBSAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greenwich: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Central Asia ; Foreign policy ; Foreign relations ; International relations ; International status ; Leadership ; Ministers (Political) ; Nostalgia ; Peoples Republic of China ; Political influences ; Political leadership ; Post-communist societies ; Power relations ; Presidents ; Regional politics ; Russia ; Russian Federation ; Television ; Union of Soviet Socialist Republics</subject><ispartof>Orbis (Philadelphia), 2010, Vol.54 (4), p.615-629</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-b9b4c3a17f95eff8928400a8ab1216d469a9bbf9dcdba6d4f547a6ecc077247c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27866,27923,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spechler, Martin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spechler, Dina R.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Russia Succeeding in Central Asia?</title><title>Orbis (Philadelphia)</title><description>On a number of recent occasions, the top Russian leadership has expressed its special interest in the affairs of former Soviet republics, including the assertion that Russia has a “privileged” relationship with these now independent states.
1
1
On Russian Channel One television on August 31, 2008, President Dmitri Medvedev referred to his country's “privileged interests” [
privilegirovannie interesi] in
unspecified regions, similar to other countries’ special interests. In his summary for the Diplomatic Yearbook for 2008 Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov “mutually privileged relations” based on “cultural/civilizational unity” with all the countries of the CIS, but specifically denied that this amounted to a “sphere of influence.” Cf. Dmitri Trenin, “Russia's Spheres of
Interest, not
Influence,” The Washington Quarterly, October 2009.
Is this a claim of accomplished fact, of future intention, or perhaps an empty expression of nostalgia for lost status? As we see it, the record of Russian actions in the largest group of these states—the five of Central Asia—allows us to exclude the first and question whether the second is realizable. Russia must contend with the aspirations of those states themselves, as well as the determined interests of China and, to a lesser extent, the West.</description><subject>Central Asia</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Foreign relations</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International status</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Ministers (Political)</subject><subject>Nostalgia</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Political influences</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><subject>Post-communist societies</subject><subject>Power relations</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Regional politics</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Russian Federation</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>Union of Soviet Socialist Republics</subject><issn>0030-4387</issn><issn>1873-5282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Ai9FEE-tk6RtkoPIsvgFC4If55CkiaR02zVpBf-9WdeTBz0NM_O8A_MgdIqhwIDry7YYgvaxIJAmwAoAvodmmDOaV4STfTQDoJCXlLNDdBRjCwA4bWbo_CFmT1OMXmXPkzHWNr5_y3yfLW0_BtVli7S6PkYHTnXRnvzUOXq9vXlZ3uerx7uH5WKVGwpizLXQpaEKMycq6xwXhJcAiiuNCa6bshZKaO1EYxqtUu-qkqnaGgOMkZIZOkcXu7ubMLxPNo5y7aOxXad6O0xRcsoFA0Krf0lWcYy5qFkiz36R7TCFPr2RICxEhRlNEN1BJgwxBuvkJvi1Cp8Sg9wqlq38Viy3iiUwmRSn1NUuZZOTD2-DjMbb3iSJwZpRNoP_M_8FY0SDPQ</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Spechler, Martin C.</creator><creator>Spechler, Dina R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Is Russia Succeeding in Central Asia?</title><author>Spechler, Martin C. ; Spechler, Dina R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-b9b4c3a17f95eff8928400a8ab1216d469a9bbf9dcdba6d4f547a6ecc077247c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Central Asia</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Foreign relations</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International status</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Ministers (Political)</topic><topic>Nostalgia</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Political influences</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><topic>Post-communist societies</topic><topic>Power relations</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Regional politics</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Russian Federation</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>Union of Soviet Socialist Republics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spechler, Martin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spechler, Dina R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Orbis (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spechler, Martin C.</au><au>Spechler, Dina R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Russia Succeeding in Central Asia?</atitle><jtitle>Orbis (Philadelphia)</jtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>615</spage><epage>629</epage><pages>615-629</pages><issn>0030-4387</issn><eissn>1873-5282</eissn><coden>ORBSAS</coden><abstract>On a number of recent occasions, the top Russian leadership has expressed its special interest in the affairs of former Soviet republics, including the assertion that Russia has a “privileged” relationship with these now independent states.
1
1
On Russian Channel One television on August 31, 2008, President Dmitri Medvedev referred to his country's “privileged interests” [
privilegirovannie interesi] in
unspecified regions, similar to other countries’ special interests. In his summary for the Diplomatic Yearbook for 2008 Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov “mutually privileged relations” based on “cultural/civilizational unity” with all the countries of the CIS, but specifically denied that this amounted to a “sphere of influence.” Cf. Dmitri Trenin, “Russia's Spheres of
Interest, not
Influence,” The Washington Quarterly, October 2009.
Is this a claim of accomplished fact, of future intention, or perhaps an empty expression of nostalgia for lost status? As we see it, the record of Russian actions in the largest group of these states—the five of Central Asia—allows us to exclude the first and question whether the second is realizable. Russia must contend with the aspirations of those states themselves, as well as the determined interests of China and, to a lesser extent, the West.</abstract><cop>Greenwich</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.orbis.2010.07.008</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-4387 |
ispartof | Orbis (Philadelphia), 2010, Vol.54 (4), p.615-629 |
issn | 0030-4387 1873-5282 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_838970235 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Central Asia Foreign policy Foreign relations International relations International status Leadership Ministers (Political) Nostalgia Peoples Republic of China Political influences Political leadership Post-communist societies Power relations Presidents Regional politics Russia Russian Federation Television Union of Soviet Socialist Republics |
title | Is Russia Succeeding in Central Asia? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A06%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Russia%20Succeeding%20in%20Central%20Asia?&rft.jtitle=Orbis%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=Spechler,%20Martin%20C.&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=615&rft.epage=629&rft.pages=615-629&rft.issn=0030-4387&rft.eissn=1873-5282&rft.coden=ORBSAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.orbis.2010.07.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E838970235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-b9b4c3a17f95eff8928400a8ab1216d469a9bbf9dcdba6d4f547a6ecc077247c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751995173&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |