Evidence for Egocentric Comparison in Social Judgment

People often disagree in their judgments of the traits and the abilities of others. Three studies suggested that these differences arise because people activate and use their own particular behaviors as norms when evaluating the performances of others. In Study 1, 71% of participants reported compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality and social psychology 1996-08, Vol.71 (2), p.213-229
Main Authors: Dunning, David, Hayes, Andrew F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ability
Attitudes
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Egocentrism
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Impression Formation
Influences
Judgment
Male
Norms
Perceptions
Personality Traits
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Self Evaluation
Social attribution, perception and cognition
Social Behavior
Social judgement
Social judgments
Social Perception
Social psychology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:People often disagree in their judgments of the traits and the abilities of others. Three studies suggested that these differences arise because people activate and use their own particular behaviors as norms when evaluating the performances of others. In Study 1, 71% of participants reported comparing a target's behavior with their own behavior when providing judgments of that target. Participants also provided descriptions of their own behavior more quickly after judging another person's behavior, suggesting they had activated information about their own behavior when judging that of another (Studies 2 and 3). In all 3 studies, judgments of another's behavior tended to be egocentrically related to the participants' own behavior, particularly among those who displayed the strongest evidence of activation of self-information (Studies 1 and 2). Discussion centers on the generality of these findings and their implications for past and future research.
ISSN:0022-3514
1939-1315
DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.213