"Universal Reason" as a Local Organizational Method: Announcement of a Study

This article announces an ethnomethodological study of the formal analytic practices of Tibetan philosophers engaged in the collaborative work of producing correct philosophical debates. Tibetan scholar-monks address themselves to the work of sustaining an argument, providing formal warrants for aut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human studies 1996-07, Vol.19 (3), p.289-301
Main Author: Liberman, Kenneth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Buddhism
Buddhist philosophy
Comparative philosophy
Debate
Dialectic
Dialectics
Ethnomethodology
Monks
Organization
Philosophical analysis
Philosophy
Rationality
Reason
Reasoning
Theology
Truth
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9b9d2ab2ca80e2b8e4857a5941d36c248c4fb465d7438bc51c0db34d9bdbd93d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9b9d2ab2ca80e2b8e4857a5941d36c248c4fb465d7438bc51c0db34d9bdbd93d3
container_end_page 301
container_issue 3
container_start_page 289
container_title Human studies
container_volume 19
creator Liberman, Kenneth
description This article announces an ethnomethodological study of the formal analytic practices of Tibetan philosophers engaged in the collaborative work of producing correct philosophical debates. Tibetan scholar-monks address themselves to the work of sustaining an argument, providing formal warrants for authorizing truth and correctness, objectivating their accounts and disengaging those accounts from their local organizational practices. At the same time, it is the concern of the Tibetans' dialectics to avoid naive acceptance of reified accounts. The announced study proposes to describe their philosophical activities and to locate what originality may affect resolving the tension between formal analytic work and philosophical insight into truth.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00144023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839035788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20011113</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20011113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9b9d2ab2ca80e2b8e4857a5941d36c248c4fb465d7438bc51c0db34d9bdbd93d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d1LwzAQAPAgCs7pi-9CUVAQqvlsU9_mcCpUBurAt5KvakeXzKQV5l9vxkTBB-_lLsePg9wBcIjgBYIwv7yeQIgohZhsgQFiOU45Qy_bYABRRmJN-S7YC2EOIaQF4QNQHs9s82F8EG3yaERw9jgRIRFJ6VRsTf2rsM2n6Bpn4_PBdG9OXyUja11vlVkY2yWujvyp6_VqH-zUog3m4DsPwWxy8zy-S8vp7f14VKaKUNylhSw0FhIrwaHBkhvKWS5YQZEmmcKUK1pLmjGdU8KlYkhBLQnVhdRSF0STITjbzF16996b0FWLJijTtsIa14eKkwISlnMe5em_Mlsvi2U4wpM_cO56H_8cqri5aBBG63HnG6W8C8Gbulr6ZiH8qkKwWh-g-j1AxEcbPA-d8z8SRxCDkC8oIn9d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634051218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Universal Reason" as a Local Organizational Method: Announcement of a Study</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Online Journals Archive Complete</source><creator>Liberman, Kenneth</creator><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><description>This article announces an ethnomethodological study of the formal analytic practices of Tibetan philosophers engaged in the collaborative work of producing correct philosophical debates. Tibetan scholar-monks address themselves to the work of sustaining an argument, providing formal warrants for authorizing truth and correctness, objectivating their accounts and disengaging those accounts from their local organizational practices. At the same time, it is the concern of the Tibetans' dialectics to avoid naive acceptance of reified accounts. The announced study proposes to describe their philosophical activities and to locate what originality may affect resolving the tension between formal analytic work and philosophical insight into truth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-8548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-851X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00144023</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUSTDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing</publisher><subject>Buddhism ; Buddhist philosophy ; Comparative philosophy ; Debate ; Dialectic ; Dialectics ; Ethnomethodology ; Monks ; Organization ; Philosophical analysis ; Philosophy ; Rationality ; Reason ; Reasoning ; Theology ; Truth</subject><ispartof>Human studies, 1996-07, Vol.19 (3), p.289-301</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9b9d2ab2ca80e2b8e4857a5941d36c248c4fb465d7438bc51c0db34d9bdbd93d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9b9d2ab2ca80e2b8e4857a5941d36c248c4fb465d7438bc51c0db34d9bdbd93d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20011113$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20011113$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33223,33774,58237,58470</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><title>"Universal Reason" as a Local Organizational Method: Announcement of a Study</title><title>Human studies</title><description>This article announces an ethnomethodological study of the formal analytic practices of Tibetan philosophers engaged in the collaborative work of producing correct philosophical debates. Tibetan scholar-monks address themselves to the work of sustaining an argument, providing formal warrants for authorizing truth and correctness, objectivating their accounts and disengaging those accounts from their local organizational practices. At the same time, it is the concern of the Tibetans' dialectics to avoid naive acceptance of reified accounts. The announced study proposes to describe their philosophical activities and to locate what originality may affect resolving the tension between formal analytic work and philosophical insight into truth.</description><subject>Buddhism</subject><subject>Buddhist philosophy</subject><subject>Comparative philosophy</subject><subject>Debate</subject><subject>Dialectic</subject><subject>Dialectics</subject><subject>Ethnomethodology</subject><subject>Monks</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Philosophical analysis</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Reason</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Truth</subject><issn>0163-8548</issn><issn>1572-851X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90d1LwzAQAPAgCs7pi-9CUVAQqvlsU9_mcCpUBurAt5KvakeXzKQV5l9vxkTBB-_lLsePg9wBcIjgBYIwv7yeQIgohZhsgQFiOU45Qy_bYABRRmJN-S7YC2EOIaQF4QNQHs9s82F8EG3yaERw9jgRIRFJ6VRsTf2rsM2n6Bpn4_PBdG9OXyUja11vlVkY2yWujvyp6_VqH-zUog3m4DsPwWxy8zy-S8vp7f14VKaKUNylhSw0FhIrwaHBkhvKWS5YQZEmmcKUK1pLmjGdU8KlYkhBLQnVhdRSF0STITjbzF16996b0FWLJijTtsIa14eKkwISlnMe5em_Mlsvi2U4wpM_cO56H_8cqri5aBBG63HnG6W8C8Gbulr6ZiH8qkKwWh-g-j1AxEcbPA-d8z8SRxCDkC8oIn9d</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>Liberman, Kenneth</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishing</general><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HDMVH</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>"Universal Reason" as a Local Organizational Method: Announcement of a Study</title><author>Liberman, Kenneth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9b9d2ab2ca80e2b8e4857a5941d36c248c4fb465d7438bc51c0db34d9bdbd93d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Buddhism</topic><topic>Buddhist philosophy</topic><topic>Comparative philosophy</topic><topic>Debate</topic><topic>Dialectic</topic><topic>Dialectics</topic><topic>Ethnomethodology</topic><topic>Monks</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Philosophical analysis</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Reason</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Truth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 15</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Human studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liberman, Kenneth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Universal Reason" as a Local Organizational Method: Announcement of a Study</atitle><jtitle>Human studies</jtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>289-301</pages><issn>0163-8548</issn><eissn>1572-851X</eissn><coden>HUSTDT</coden><abstract>This article announces an ethnomethodological study of the formal analytic practices of Tibetan philosophers engaged in the collaborative work of producing correct philosophical debates. Tibetan scholar-monks address themselves to the work of sustaining an argument, providing formal warrants for authorizing truth and correctness, objectivating their accounts and disengaging those accounts from their local organizational practices. At the same time, it is the concern of the Tibetans' dialectics to avoid naive acceptance of reified accounts. The announced study proposes to describe their philosophical activities and to locate what originality may affect resolving the tension between formal analytic work and philosophical insight into truth.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00144023</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-8548
ispartof Human studies, 1996-07, Vol.19 (3), p.289-301
issn 0163-8548
1572-851X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839035788
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Online Journals Archive Complete
subjects Buddhism
Buddhist philosophy
Comparative philosophy
Debate
Dialectic
Dialectics
Ethnomethodology
Monks
Organization
Philosophical analysis
Philosophy
Rationality
Reason
Reasoning
Theology
Truth
title "Universal Reason" as a Local Organizational Method: Announcement of a Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A10%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Universal%20Reason%22%20as%20a%20Local%20Organizational%20Method:%20Announcement%20of%20a%20Study&rft.jtitle=Human%20studies&rft.au=Liberman,%20Kenneth&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=289-301&rft.issn=0163-8548&rft.eissn=1572-851X&rft.coden=HUSTDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00144023&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20011113%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9b9d2ab2ca80e2b8e4857a5941d36c248c4fb465d7438bc51c0db34d9bdbd93d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634051218&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20011113&rfr_iscdi=true