Content-analysis studies of therapeutic interviews: 1954 to 1964

Content analysis traditionally implies a limited set of criteria and procedures, comprising what is here called the classical model. Some studies of therapeutic interviews have deviated from 1 or more of these prescriptions, leading to debate about their methodological status. This paper argues that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological bulletin 1965-05, Vol.63 (5), p.298-321
Main Author: Marsden, Gerald
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Communication
Human
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Interviews
Models, Theoretical
Old Medline
Personality Traits
Psychotherapy
Therapeutic Processes
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-d814c18c9087bf777841b3cd244432e79ebff35932ba9f22e54ff7257d436b203
cites
container_end_page 321
container_issue 5
container_start_page 298
container_title Psychological bulletin
container_volume 63
creator Marsden, Gerald
description Content analysis traditionally implies a limited set of criteria and procedures, comprising what is here called the classical model. Some studies of therapeutic interviews have deviated from 1 or more of these prescriptions, leading to debate about their methodological status. This paper argues that certain common deviations from the classical model constitute other models which reflect responses to problems posed by the data, the variables under study, and investigator personality characteristics. Rationales for 2 such models are presented, studies representing all 3 models are reviewed, and certain issues common to this body of research are discussed. (6 p. ref.)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0021925
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84042894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>84042894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-d814c18c9087bf777841b3cd244432e79ebff35932ba9f22e54ff7257d436b203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1LwzAYBeAgis4p-AukqIg31SRvPr1Shl8w8EavQ9omrKNba9Iq-_dmbCIIXp2bhwPnIHRC8DXBIG9mGFOiKd9BI6JB54RxvotGGAPkVGN9gA5jnGOMJRewjw4Io1pRrEbobtIue7fsc7u0zSrWMYv9UNUuZq3P-pkLtnNDX5dZnVj4rN1XvM2I5izr25SCHaE9b5vojrc5Ru-PD2-T53z6-vQyuZ_mFgT0eaUIK4kqNVay8FJKxUgBZUUZY0Cd1K7wHrgGWljtKXWceS8plxUDUVAMY3S56e1C-zG42JtFHUvXNHbp2iEaxTCjSrMEz_7AeTuEtC4akXYLophI6Pw_RKgWSgKHtbraqDK0MQbnTRfqhQ0rQ7BZH29-jk_0dFs4FAtX_cLt0wlcbIDtrOniqrQh3dq4aIqhMQIMN0nCN9aRhbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614261846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Content-analysis studies of therapeutic interviews: 1954 to 1964</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Marsden, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Marsden, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>Content analysis traditionally implies a limited set of criteria and procedures, comprising what is here called the classical model. Some studies of therapeutic interviews have deviated from 1 or more of these prescriptions, leading to debate about their methodological status. This paper argues that certain common deviations from the classical model constitute other models which reflect responses to problems posed by the data, the variables under study, and investigator personality characteristics. Rationales for 2 such models are presented, studies representing all 3 models are reviewed, and certain issues common to this body of research are discussed. (6 p. ref.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0021925</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14298208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Communication ; Human ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Interviews ; Models, Theoretical ; Old Medline ; Personality Traits ; Psychotherapy ; Therapeutic Processes</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 1965-05, Vol.63 (5), p.298-321</ispartof><rights>1965 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1965, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-d814c18c9087bf777841b3cd244432e79ebff35932ba9f22e54ff7257d436b203</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14298208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marsden, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>Content-analysis studies of therapeutic interviews: 1954 to 1964</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>Content analysis traditionally implies a limited set of criteria and procedures, comprising what is here called the classical model. Some studies of therapeutic interviews have deviated from 1 or more of these prescriptions, leading to debate about their methodological status. This paper argues that certain common deviations from the classical model constitute other models which reflect responses to problems posed by the data, the variables under study, and investigator personality characteristics. Rationales for 2 such models are presented, studies representing all 3 models are reviewed, and certain issues common to this body of research are discussed. (6 p. ref.)</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Therapeutic Processes</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1965</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10F1LwzAYBeAgis4p-AukqIg31SRvPr1Shl8w8EavQ9omrKNba9Iq-_dmbCIIXp2bhwPnIHRC8DXBIG9mGFOiKd9BI6JB54RxvotGGAPkVGN9gA5jnGOMJRewjw4Io1pRrEbobtIue7fsc7u0zSrWMYv9UNUuZq3P-pkLtnNDX5dZnVj4rN1XvM2I5izr25SCHaE9b5vojrc5Ru-PD2-T53z6-vQyuZ_mFgT0eaUIK4kqNVay8FJKxUgBZUUZY0Cd1K7wHrgGWljtKXWceS8plxUDUVAMY3S56e1C-zG42JtFHUvXNHbp2iEaxTCjSrMEz_7AeTuEtC4akXYLophI6Pw_RKgWSgKHtbraqDK0MQbnTRfqhQ0rQ7BZH29-jk_0dFs4FAtX_cLt0wlcbIDtrOniqrQh3dq4aIqhMQIMN0nCN9aRhbg</recordid><startdate>196505</startdate><enddate>196505</enddate><creator>Marsden, Gerald</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196505</creationdate><title>Content-analysis studies of therapeutic interviews: 1954 to 1964</title><author>Marsden, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-d814c18c9087bf777841b3cd244432e79ebff35932ba9f22e54ff7257d436b203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1965</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Therapeutic Processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marsden, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marsden, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Content-analysis studies of therapeutic interviews: 1954 to 1964</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>1965-05</date><risdate>1965</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>321</epage><pages>298-321</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>Content analysis traditionally implies a limited set of criteria and procedures, comprising what is here called the classical model. Some studies of therapeutic interviews have deviated from 1 or more of these prescriptions, leading to debate about their methodological status. This paper argues that certain common deviations from the classical model constitute other models which reflect responses to problems posed by the data, the variables under study, and investigator personality characteristics. Rationales for 2 such models are presented, studies representing all 3 models are reviewed, and certain issues common to this body of research are discussed. (6 p. ref.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>14298208</pmid><doi>10.1037/h0021925</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof Psychological bulletin, 1965-05, Vol.63 (5), p.298-321
issn 0033-2909
1939-1455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84042894
source PsycARTICLES
subjects Communication
Human
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Interviews
Models, Theoretical
Old Medline
Personality Traits
Psychotherapy
Therapeutic Processes
title Content-analysis studies of therapeutic interviews: 1954 to 1964
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Content-analysis%20studies%20of%20therapeutic%20interviews:%201954%20to%201964&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Marsden,%20Gerald&rft.date=1965-05&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=321&rft.pages=298-321&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0021925&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E84042894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-d814c18c9087bf777841b3cd244432e79ebff35932ba9f22e54ff7257d436b203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614261846&rft_id=info:pmid/14298208&rfr_iscdi=true