Is there a market for ideas?

This article draws on recent work in market design to evaluate the conditions under which a market for ideas or technology (MfTs) will emerge and operate efficiently. As highlighted by Roth (2007), effective market design must ensure three basic principles: market thickness, lack of congestion, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Industrial and corporate change 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.805-837
Main Authors: Gans, Joshua S., Stern, Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Efficiency
High technology
Innovation diffusion
Inventions
Knowledge
Knowledge management
Knowledge transfer
New technology
Research and development
Studies
Technological change
Technology assessment
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article draws on recent work in market design to evaluate the conditions under which a market for ideas or technology (MfTs) will emerge and operate efficiently. As highlighted by Roth (2007), effective market design must ensure three basic principles: market thickness, lack of congestion, and market safety. Roth also highlights the importance of dealing with “repugnance.” Our analysis identifies the factors that are, in most circumstances, likely to inhibit the allocative efficiency of MfT. We show that key institutional developments such as the development of formalized IP exchanges suggest that effective market design may be possible for some innovation markets. Finally, our analysis suggests that markets for ideas are beset by the “repugnance” problem: from the perspective of market design, Open Science is an institution that places normative value on “free” disclosure and so undermines the ability of ideas producers to earn market-based returns for producing even very valuable “pure” knowledge.
ISSN:0960-6491
1464-3650
DOI:10.1093/icc/dtq023