Loading…

PARENTAL ENTITLEMENT AND CORPORAL PUNISHMENT

Considers why claims of parent-entitlement are less prominent in debates about corporal punishment (CP) of children than about such things as religion in schools or the circumcision of male children. It is argued that parent entitlement should not be a factor in the CP discourse which should center...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law and contemporary problems 2010-04, Vol.73 (2), p.189-210
Main Author: Dwyer, James G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Considers why claims of parent-entitlement are less prominent in debates about corporal punishment (CP) of children than about such things as religion in schools or the circumcision of male children. It is argued that parent entitlement should not be a factor in the CP discourse which should center on children's rights. Parental-rights claims based on either possession or control are said to represent a "conceptual error" since they really are a matter of "children's entitlement." Supporters of CP should consider whether children have the right to be or not to be spanked. Further, claims of parental entitlement have not been as prominent in discourse about CP as in other child-rearing contexts because they tend to be superfluous & only plausible in relation to concerns about a child's well-being. It is concluded that claims of parental entitlement in discussions of parental CP only "muddy the waters." Discourse should instead focus on the rights of children & "how much discretion or freedom they leave for parents to discipline their children.". J. Lindroth
ISSN:0023-9186
1945-2322