Loading…

Utility of Comprehensive Assessment of Strain Dyssynchrony Index by Speckle Tracking Imaging for Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

The strain delay index is reportedly a marker of dyssynchrony and residual myocardial contractility. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that a relatively simple version of the strain dyssynchrony index (SDI) can predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and that combi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2011-02, Vol.107 (3), p.439-446
Main Authors: Tatsumi, Kazuhiro, MD, Tanaka, Hidekazu, MD, PhD, Yamawaki, Kouhei, MD, Ryo, Keiko, MD, Omar, Alaa Mabrouk Salem, MD, Fukuda, Yuko, MD, Norisada, Kazuko, MD, PhD, Matsumoto, Kensuke, MD, Onishi, Tetsuari, MD, PhD, Gorcsan, John, MD, Yoshida, Akihiro, MD, PhD, Kawai, Hiroya, MD, PhD, Hirata, Ken-ichi, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The strain delay index is reportedly a marker of dyssynchrony and residual myocardial contractility. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that a relatively simple version of the strain dyssynchrony index (SDI) can predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and that combining assessment of radial, circumferential, and longitudinal SDI can further improve the prediction of responders. A total of 52 patients who underwent CRT were studied. The SDI was calculated as the average difference between peak and end-systolic strain from 6 segments for radial and circumferential SDI and 18 segments for longitudinal SDI. Conventional dyssynchrony measures were assessed by interventricular mechanical delay, the Yu index, and radial dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain. Response was defined as a ≥15% decrease in end-systolic volume after 3 months. Of the individual parameters, radial SDI ≥6.5% was the best predictor of response to CRT, with sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 81%, and an area under the curve of 0.87 (p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.09.038