The economics of biodiversity: the evolving agenda

This paper assesses how the economics of biodiversity, as a field, has evolved in response to developments in biodiversity science and policy over the life of the journal, Environment and Development Economics. Several main trends in the economics of biodiversity are identified. First, biodiversity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environment and development economics 2010-12, Vol.15 (6), p.721-746
Main Author: PERRINGS, CHARLES
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abundance
Agroecosystems
Biodiversity
Biodiversity conservation
Climate change
Developing countries
Development economics
Drivers
Ecological economics
Economic growth
Economic theory
Economics
Ecosystem assessment
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environmental conservation
Environmental economics
Environmental impact
Global economy
Green economics
LDCs
Optimization
Pathogens
Predators
Public good
Science
Soil erosion
Species
Studies
Sustainable agriculture
Trends
Wildlife conservation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper assesses how the economics of biodiversity, as a field, has evolved in response to developments in biodiversity science and policy over the life of the journal, Environment and Development Economics. Several main trends in the economics of biodiversity are identified. First, biodiversity change has come to be analyzed largely through its impact on ecosystem services (in the sense of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Second, there has been a growing focus on factors that optimally lead to biodiversity decline, i.e., the benefits to be had from reducing the abundance of pests, predators, pathogens, and competitors. Third, increasing attention is being paid to two global drivers of biodiversity change, climate and global economic integration, and the effect they have on the distribution and abundance of both beneficial and harmful species. Fourth, there has been growing interest in the development of instruments to deal with the transboundary public good aspect of biodiversity, and in particular in the development of payments for ecosystem services. The paper identifies the influence of these trends on attempts to model the role of biodiversity in the production of goods and services.
ISSN:1355-770X
1469-4395
DOI:10.1017/S1355770X10000343