Reliability testing of the FAMCARE-2 scale: measuring family carer satisfaction with palliative care

Measuring carers’ perceived satisfaction with services is crucial if services are going to continually improve their responsiveness to the needs of those they serve. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the next generation FAMCARE tool, which was adapted to reflect inpatient and te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Palliative medicine 2010-10, Vol.24 (7), p.674-681
Main Authors: Aoun, Samar, Bird, Sonia, Kristjanson, Linda J, Currow, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Australia
Cancer
Caregivers
Caregivers - psychology
Carers
Collaboration
Female
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Palliative care
Palliative Care - psychology
Patient care
Patient satisfaction
Personal Satisfaction
Quality of life
Quantitative psychology
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Service provision
Social support
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Teams
Terminally Ill
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Measuring carers’ perceived satisfaction with services is crucial if services are going to continually improve their responsiveness to the needs of those they serve. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the next generation FAMCARE tool, which was adapted to reflect inpatient and team-based care using palliative care services who are participating in the Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration. FAMCARE-2 was distributed to a consecutive cohort of carers whilst in the caregiving role nationally. Analyses of internal consistency, generated structure and relationships of satisfaction with service provision by three demographic variables were undertaken. A total of 497 carers were recruited from 29 palliative care services across Australia, a mix of inpatient and community services. The scale achieved a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.93) and item-to-total correlation coefficient of 0.49—0.72. Factor analysis of FAMCARE-2 revealed a 4-factor structure (management of physical symptoms and comfort, provision of information, family support and patient psychological care). Results of the survey indicated satisfaction with service provision across the FAMCARE-2 subscales. Older, female carers without a culturally and linguistically diverse background were more satisfied with service provision. We conclude that FAMCARE-2 is a psychometrically sound instrument useful for measuring family carer satisfaction with service provision in a variety of palliative care settings.
ISSN:0269-2163
1477-030X
DOI:10.1177/0269216310373166