Loading…

The effects of phytophagous insects on water and soil nutrient concentrations and fluxes through forest stands of the Level II monitoring network in the UK

The effects of insect defoliators on throughfall and soil nutrient fluxes were studied in coniferous and deciduous stands at five UK intensive monitoring plots (1998 to 2008). Links were found between the dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fluxes through the forest system...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Science of the total environment 2010-12, Vol.409 (1), p.169-181
Main Authors: Pitman, R.M., Vanguelova, E.I., Benham, S.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a83ea6e7e661cca32c48c4f86b69fa4b7b5aa4e5c6649acfa56ba88ede0bb8e63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a83ea6e7e661cca32c48c4f86b69fa4b7b5aa4e5c6649acfa56ba88ede0bb8e63
container_end_page 181
container_issue 1
container_start_page 169
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 409
creator Pitman, R.M.
Vanguelova, E.I.
Benham, S.E.
description The effects of insect defoliators on throughfall and soil nutrient fluxes were studied in coniferous and deciduous stands at five UK intensive monitoring plots (1998 to 2008). Links were found between the dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fluxes through the forest system to biological activity within the canopy. Underlying soil type determined the leaching or accumulation of these elements. Under oak, monitored at two sites, frass from caterpillars of Tortrix viridana and Operophtera brumata added direct deposition of ~ 16 kg ha −1extra N during defoliation. Peaks of nitrate (NO 3–N) flux between 5 and 9 kg ha −1 (×5 usual winter values) were recorded in consecutive years in shallow soil waters. Synchronous rises in deep soil NO 3–N fluxes at the Grizedale sandy site indicate downward flushing, not seen at the clay site. Under three Sitka spruce stands, generation of honeydew (DOC) was attributed to two aphid species ( Elatobium abietinum and Cinara pilicornis) with distinctive feeding strategies. Throughfall DOC showed mean annual fluxes (6 seasons) ~ 45–60 kg ha −1 compared with rainfall values of 14–22 kg ha −1. Increases of total N in throughfall and NO 3–N fluxes in shallow soil solution were detected — soil water fluxes reached 8 kg ha −1 in Llyn Brianne, ~ 25 kg ha −1 in Tummel, and ~ 40 kg NO 3–N ha −1 in Coalburn. At Tummel, on sandy soil, NO 3–N leaching showed increased concentration at depth, attributed to microbiological activity within the soil. By contrast, at Coalburn and Llyn Brianne, sites on peaty gleys, soil water NO 3–N was retained mostly within the humus layer. Soil type is thus key to predicting N movement and retention patterns. These long term analyses show important direct and indirect effects of phytophagous insects in forest ecosystems, on above and below ground processes affecting tree growth, soil condition, vegetation and water quality.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.029
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851465922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969710009903</els_id><sourcerecordid>763166592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a83ea6e7e661cca32c48c4f86b69fa4b7b5aa4e5c6649acfa56ba88ede0bb8e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9uEzEQxlcIREPhFagvCC4J9v7xro9VVSAiEgeas-X1jrMOGzvY3pQ-Cy_LbBLKjVqyRhr_Zr6xP2fZFaMLRhn_uF1EbZNP4A6LnGKWigXNxbNsxppazBnN-fNsRmnZzAUX9UX2KsYtxVU37GV2kVPBWSXELPt91wMBY0CnSLwh-_4h-X2vNn6MxLp4yjtyrxIEolxHorcDcWMKFlwi2juNMahkvYtHwAzjL4gk9cGPm54YHyAmEhOeHSUSKq7gAANZLsnOO7xHsG5DHKR7H36g6hFZf32dvTBqiPDmHC-z9afbu5sv89W3z8ub69Vcl41Ic9UUoDjUwDnTWhU5pnVpGt5yYVTZ1m2lVAmV5rwUShtV8VY1DXRA27YBXlxm709998H_HHFYubNRwzAoB_gMsqlYySuR50-SNS8Yn1AkP_yXZHVNi4IKNsnXJ1QHH2MAI_fB7lR4kIzKyW25lY9uy8ltSYVEt7Hy7VlkbHfQPdb9tReBd2dARa0GE5TTNv7jirLCPXFXJ84oL9UmILP-jkoFZYKKilZIXJ8IQCMOFsI0EqD3nQ34R2Tn7ZPj_gEplNoT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770330916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of phytophagous insects on water and soil nutrient concentrations and fluxes through forest stands of the Level II monitoring network in the UK</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Pitman, R.M. ; Vanguelova, E.I. ; Benham, S.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pitman, R.M. ; Vanguelova, E.I. ; Benham, S.E.</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of insect defoliators on throughfall and soil nutrient fluxes were studied in coniferous and deciduous stands at five UK intensive monitoring plots (1998 to 2008). Links were found between the dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fluxes through the forest system to biological activity within the canopy. Underlying soil type determined the leaching or accumulation of these elements. Under oak, monitored at two sites, frass from caterpillars of Tortrix viridana and Operophtera brumata added direct deposition of ~ 16 kg ha −1extra N during defoliation. Peaks of nitrate (NO 3–N) flux between 5 and 9 kg ha −1 (×5 usual winter values) were recorded in consecutive years in shallow soil waters. Synchronous rises in deep soil NO 3–N fluxes at the Grizedale sandy site indicate downward flushing, not seen at the clay site. Under three Sitka spruce stands, generation of honeydew (DOC) was attributed to two aphid species ( Elatobium abietinum and Cinara pilicornis) with distinctive feeding strategies. Throughfall DOC showed mean annual fluxes (6 seasons) ~ 45–60 kg ha −1 compared with rainfall values of 14–22 kg ha −1. Increases of total N in throughfall and NO 3–N fluxes in shallow soil solution were detected — soil water fluxes reached 8 kg ha −1 in Llyn Brianne, ~ 25 kg ha −1 in Tummel, and ~ 40 kg NO 3–N ha −1 in Coalburn. At Tummel, on sandy soil, NO 3–N leaching showed increased concentration at depth, attributed to microbiological activity within the soil. By contrast, at Coalburn and Llyn Brianne, sites on peaty gleys, soil water NO 3–N was retained mostly within the humus layer. Soil type is thus key to predicting N movement and retention patterns. These long term analyses show important direct and indirect effects of phytophagous insects in forest ecosystems, on above and below ground processes affecting tree growth, soil condition, vegetation and water quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20961599</identifier><identifier>CODEN: STENDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Aphididae ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cinara pilicornis ; Elatobium abietinum ; Environmental Monitoring ; Fluxes ; Forest monitoring ; Forestry ; Forests ; Fresh Water - chemistry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General forest ecology ; Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology ; Insecta - metabolism ; Insecta - physiology ; Insects ; K flux ; Microorganisms ; Monitoring ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Nitrogen Cycle ; Nutrients ; Oak ; Operophtera brumata ; Sitka spruce ; Soil (material) ; Soil - chemistry ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Soil Pollutants - metabolism ; Soil type ; Soil water NO 3–N ; Spruce aphid ; Stands ; Supports ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Throughfall DOC flux ; Tortrix viridana ; Total N flux ; Trees - chemistry ; Trees - metabolism ; United Kingdom ; Water quality ; Winter moth</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2010-12, Vol.409 (1), p.169-181</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a83ea6e7e661cca32c48c4f86b69fa4b7b5aa4e5c6649acfa56ba88ede0bb8e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a83ea6e7e661cca32c48c4f86b69fa4b7b5aa4e5c6649acfa56ba88ede0bb8e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23452349$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20961599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pitman, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanguelova, E.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benham, S.E.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of phytophagous insects on water and soil nutrient concentrations and fluxes through forest stands of the Level II monitoring network in the UK</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>The effects of insect defoliators on throughfall and soil nutrient fluxes were studied in coniferous and deciduous stands at five UK intensive monitoring plots (1998 to 2008). Links were found between the dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fluxes through the forest system to biological activity within the canopy. Underlying soil type determined the leaching or accumulation of these elements. Under oak, monitored at two sites, frass from caterpillars of Tortrix viridana and Operophtera brumata added direct deposition of ~ 16 kg ha −1extra N during defoliation. Peaks of nitrate (NO 3–N) flux between 5 and 9 kg ha −1 (×5 usual winter values) were recorded in consecutive years in shallow soil waters. Synchronous rises in deep soil NO 3–N fluxes at the Grizedale sandy site indicate downward flushing, not seen at the clay site. Under three Sitka spruce stands, generation of honeydew (DOC) was attributed to two aphid species ( Elatobium abietinum and Cinara pilicornis) with distinctive feeding strategies. Throughfall DOC showed mean annual fluxes (6 seasons) ~ 45–60 kg ha −1 compared with rainfall values of 14–22 kg ha −1. Increases of total N in throughfall and NO 3–N fluxes in shallow soil solution were detected — soil water fluxes reached 8 kg ha −1 in Llyn Brianne, ~ 25 kg ha −1 in Tummel, and ~ 40 kg NO 3–N ha −1 in Coalburn. At Tummel, on sandy soil, NO 3–N leaching showed increased concentration at depth, attributed to microbiological activity within the soil. By contrast, at Coalburn and Llyn Brianne, sites on peaty gleys, soil water NO 3–N was retained mostly within the humus layer. Soil type is thus key to predicting N movement and retention patterns. These long term analyses show important direct and indirect effects of phytophagous insects in forest ecosystems, on above and below ground processes affecting tree growth, soil condition, vegetation and water quality.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aphididae</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cinara pilicornis</subject><subject>Elatobium abietinum</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forest monitoring</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fresh Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General forest ecology</subject><subject>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</subject><subject>Insecta - metabolism</subject><subject>Insecta - physiology</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>K flux</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen Cycle</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Oak</subject><subject>Operophtera brumata</subject><subject>Sitka spruce</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - metabolism</subject><subject>Soil type</subject><subject>Soil water NO 3–N</subject><subject>Spruce aphid</subject><subject>Stands</subject><subject>Supports</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Throughfall DOC flux</subject><subject>Tortrix viridana</subject><subject>Total N flux</subject><subject>Trees - chemistry</subject><subject>Trees - metabolism</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Winter moth</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks9uEzEQxlcIREPhFagvCC4J9v7xro9VVSAiEgeas-X1jrMOGzvY3pQ-Cy_LbBLKjVqyRhr_Zr6xP2fZFaMLRhn_uF1EbZNP4A6LnGKWigXNxbNsxppazBnN-fNsRmnZzAUX9UX2KsYtxVU37GV2kVPBWSXELPt91wMBY0CnSLwh-_4h-X2vNn6MxLp4yjtyrxIEolxHorcDcWMKFlwi2juNMahkvYtHwAzjL4gk9cGPm54YHyAmEhOeHSUSKq7gAANZLsnOO7xHsG5DHKR7H36g6hFZf32dvTBqiPDmHC-z9afbu5sv89W3z8ub69Vcl41Ic9UUoDjUwDnTWhU5pnVpGt5yYVTZ1m2lVAmV5rwUShtV8VY1DXRA27YBXlxm709998H_HHFYubNRwzAoB_gMsqlYySuR50-SNS8Yn1AkP_yXZHVNi4IKNsnXJ1QHH2MAI_fB7lR4kIzKyW25lY9uy8ltSYVEt7Hy7VlkbHfQPdb9tReBd2dARa0GE5TTNv7jirLCPXFXJ84oL9UmILP-jkoFZYKKilZIXJ8IQCMOFsI0EqD3nQ34R2Tn7ZPj_gEplNoT</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Pitman, R.M.</creator><creator>Vanguelova, E.I.</creator><creator>Benham, S.E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>The effects of phytophagous insects on water and soil nutrient concentrations and fluxes through forest stands of the Level II monitoring network in the UK</title><author>Pitman, R.M. ; Vanguelova, E.I. ; Benham, S.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a83ea6e7e661cca32c48c4f86b69fa4b7b5aa4e5c6649acfa56ba88ede0bb8e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aphididae</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cinara pilicornis</topic><topic>Elatobium abietinum</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forest monitoring</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fresh Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General forest ecology</topic><topic>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</topic><topic>Insecta - metabolism</topic><topic>Insecta - physiology</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>K flux</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen Cycle</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Oak</topic><topic>Operophtera brumata</topic><topic>Sitka spruce</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - metabolism</topic><topic>Soil type</topic><topic>Soil water NO 3–N</topic><topic>Spruce aphid</topic><topic>Stands</topic><topic>Supports</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Throughfall DOC flux</topic><topic>Tortrix viridana</topic><topic>Total N flux</topic><topic>Trees - chemistry</topic><topic>Trees - metabolism</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Winter moth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pitman, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanguelova, E.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benham, S.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pitman, R.M.</au><au>Vanguelova, E.I.</au><au>Benham, S.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of phytophagous insects on water and soil nutrient concentrations and fluxes through forest stands of the Level II monitoring network in the UK</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>409</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>169-181</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><coden>STENDL</coden><abstract>The effects of insect defoliators on throughfall and soil nutrient fluxes were studied in coniferous and deciduous stands at five UK intensive monitoring plots (1998 to 2008). Links were found between the dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fluxes through the forest system to biological activity within the canopy. Underlying soil type determined the leaching or accumulation of these elements. Under oak, monitored at two sites, frass from caterpillars of Tortrix viridana and Operophtera brumata added direct deposition of ~ 16 kg ha −1extra N during defoliation. Peaks of nitrate (NO 3–N) flux between 5 and 9 kg ha −1 (×5 usual winter values) were recorded in consecutive years in shallow soil waters. Synchronous rises in deep soil NO 3–N fluxes at the Grizedale sandy site indicate downward flushing, not seen at the clay site. Under three Sitka spruce stands, generation of honeydew (DOC) was attributed to two aphid species ( Elatobium abietinum and Cinara pilicornis) with distinctive feeding strategies. Throughfall DOC showed mean annual fluxes (6 seasons) ~ 45–60 kg ha −1 compared with rainfall values of 14–22 kg ha −1. Increases of total N in throughfall and NO 3–N fluxes in shallow soil solution were detected — soil water fluxes reached 8 kg ha −1 in Llyn Brianne, ~ 25 kg ha −1 in Tummel, and ~ 40 kg NO 3–N ha −1 in Coalburn. At Tummel, on sandy soil, NO 3–N leaching showed increased concentration at depth, attributed to microbiological activity within the soil. By contrast, at Coalburn and Llyn Brianne, sites on peaty gleys, soil water NO 3–N was retained mostly within the humus layer. Soil type is thus key to predicting N movement and retention patterns. These long term analyses show important direct and indirect effects of phytophagous insects in forest ecosystems, on above and below ground processes affecting tree growth, soil condition, vegetation and water quality.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>20961599</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.029</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2010-12, Vol.409 (1), p.169-181
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851465922
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Aphididae
Biological and medical sciences
Cinara pilicornis
Elatobium abietinum
Environmental Monitoring
Fluxes
Forest monitoring
Forestry
Forests
Fresh Water - chemistry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General forest ecology
Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology
Insecta - metabolism
Insecta - physiology
Insects
K flux
Microorganisms
Monitoring
Nitrogen - analysis
Nitrogen - metabolism
Nitrogen Cycle
Nutrients
Oak
Operophtera brumata
Sitka spruce
Soil (material)
Soil - chemistry
Soil Pollutants - analysis
Soil Pollutants - metabolism
Soil type
Soil water NO 3–N
Spruce aphid
Stands
Supports
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
Throughfall DOC flux
Tortrix viridana
Total N flux
Trees - chemistry
Trees - metabolism
United Kingdom
Water quality
Winter moth
title The effects of phytophagous insects on water and soil nutrient concentrations and fluxes through forest stands of the Level II monitoring network in the UK
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A55%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20phytophagous%20insects%20on%20water%20and%20soil%20nutrient%20concentrations%20and%20fluxes%20through%20forest%20stands%20of%20the%20Level%20II%20monitoring%20network%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Pitman,%20R.M.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=409&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=169-181&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft.coden=STENDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E763166592%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-a83ea6e7e661cca32c48c4f86b69fa4b7b5aa4e5c6649acfa56ba88ede0bb8e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770330916&rft_id=info:pmid/20961599&rfr_iscdi=true