Food Stamps and the Market Demand for Food

This article compares estimates of disaggregated market food demand responses to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits based on exact nonlinear aggregation to responses based on linear aggregation. By accounting for income inequality, nonlinear aggregation implies that only the hous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of agricultural economics 2010-10, Vol.92 (5), p.1392-1400
Main Authors: Reed, Albert J., Levedahl, J. William
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aggregation
Agricultural and food market
Agricultural economics
AIDS
Cash
Cash income
Comparative analysis
Data aggregation
Demand
Demand analysis
Economic models
Elasticity of demand
Electronics benefit transfer
exact aggregation
food assistance policy
Food consumption
Food demand
Food prices
Food stamps
Food supply
Households
Housing demand
Income estimates
Income inequality
Market demand
market food demand
Nutrition
Q11
Q18
SNAP
Studies
U.S.A
Welfare policy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4949-9786193069b360b4e4866667f84ab69f789970ee23682df6b687977be18c1ffb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4949-9786193069b360b4e4866667f84ab69f789970ee23682df6b687977be18c1ffb3
container_end_page 1400
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1392
container_title American journal of agricultural economics
container_volume 92
creator Reed, Albert J.
Levedahl, J. William
description This article compares estimates of disaggregated market food demand responses to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits based on exact nonlinear aggregation to responses based on linear aggregation. By accounting for income inequality, nonlinear aggregation implies that only the households that receive benefits contribute to market demand responses. In contrast, linear aggregation presumes all households receive benefits and thus contribute to the market demand response. The consequence is that nonlinear market estimates are smaller than the linear estimates by roughly the fraction of households that receive benefits.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ajae/aaq069
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851746081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40931094</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/ajae/aaq069</oup_id><sourcerecordid>40931094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4949-9786193069b360b4e4866667f84ab69f789970ee23682df6b687977be18c1ffb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1LwzAUAPAgCs7pybNQPCgodS9tmo_jmJtTJipTFC8h7VJs3ZYtadH992ZWdvCggRCS93vJ4wWhQwwXGETcUaXSHaWWQMUWamFCWcgjRrdRCwCiUICIdtGec6XfAha8hc4GxkyCcaVmCxeo-SSo3nRwq-y7roJLPVuf5MYGa7WPdnI1dfrgZ22jp0H_sTcMR3dX173uKMyIICIUjFMsYl9CGlNIiSac-sFyTlRKRc64EAy0jmLKo0lOU8qZYCzVmGc4z9O4jU6bexfWLGvtKjkrXKanUzXXpnaSJ5gRChx7efxLlqa2c1-cRyzBCQHu0XmDMmucszqXC1vMlF1JDHLdNbnummy65jVr9Ecx1au_qOzedPvfs_vQZJ40maZe_PPEUQNLVxm7ocQ7b4mPh028cJX-3MT9n0jKYpbI4curhPsxAI2eJcRfBWqT2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857515408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Food Stamps and the Market Demand for Food</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Reed, Albert J. ; Levedahl, J. William</creator><creatorcontrib>Reed, Albert J. ; Levedahl, J. William</creatorcontrib><description>This article compares estimates of disaggregated market food demand responses to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits based on exact nonlinear aggregation to responses based on linear aggregation. By accounting for income inequality, nonlinear aggregation implies that only the households that receive benefits contribute to market demand responses. In contrast, linear aggregation presumes all households receive benefits and thus contribute to the market demand response. The consequence is that nonlinear market estimates are smaller than the linear estimates by roughly the fraction of households that receive benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aaq069</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAEBA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aggregation ; Agricultural and food market ; Agricultural economics ; AIDS ; Cash ; Cash income ; Comparative analysis ; Data aggregation ; Demand ; Demand analysis ; Economic models ; Elasticity of demand ; Electronics benefit transfer ; exact aggregation ; food assistance policy ; Food consumption ; Food demand ; Food prices ; Food stamps ; Food supply ; Households ; Housing demand ; Income estimates ; Income inequality ; Market demand ; market food demand ; Nutrition ; Q11 ; Q18 ; SNAP ; Studies ; U.S.A ; Welfare policy</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 2010-10, Vol.92 (5), p.1392-1400</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2010</rights><rights>The Author (2010). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2010</rights><rights>2010 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4949-9786193069b360b4e4866667f84ab69f789970ee23682df6b687977be18c1ffb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4949-9786193069b360b4e4866667f84ab69f789970ee23682df6b687977be18c1ffb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40931094$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40931094$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reed, Albert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levedahl, J. William</creatorcontrib><title>Food Stamps and the Market Demand for Food</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><description>This article compares estimates of disaggregated market food demand responses to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits based on exact nonlinear aggregation to responses based on linear aggregation. By accounting for income inequality, nonlinear aggregation implies that only the households that receive benefits contribute to market demand responses. In contrast, linear aggregation presumes all households receive benefits and thus contribute to the market demand response. The consequence is that nonlinear market estimates are smaller than the linear estimates by roughly the fraction of households that receive benefits.</description><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Agricultural and food market</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Cash</subject><subject>Cash income</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Data aggregation</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Demand analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Elasticity of demand</subject><subject>Electronics benefit transfer</subject><subject>exact aggregation</subject><subject>food assistance policy</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food demand</subject><subject>Food prices</subject><subject>Food stamps</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housing demand</subject><subject>Income estimates</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Market demand</subject><subject>market food demand</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Q11</subject><subject>Q18</subject><subject>SNAP</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Welfare policy</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1LwzAUAPAgCs7pybNQPCgodS9tmo_jmJtTJipTFC8h7VJs3ZYtadH992ZWdvCggRCS93vJ4wWhQwwXGETcUaXSHaWWQMUWamFCWcgjRrdRCwCiUICIdtGec6XfAha8hc4GxkyCcaVmCxeo-SSo3nRwq-y7roJLPVuf5MYGa7WPdnI1dfrgZ22jp0H_sTcMR3dX173uKMyIICIUjFMsYl9CGlNIiSac-sFyTlRKRc64EAy0jmLKo0lOU8qZYCzVmGc4z9O4jU6bexfWLGvtKjkrXKanUzXXpnaSJ5gRChx7efxLlqa2c1-cRyzBCQHu0XmDMmucszqXC1vMlF1JDHLdNbnummy65jVr9Ecx1au_qOzedPvfs_vQZJ40maZe_PPEUQNLVxm7ocQ7b4mPh028cJX-3MT9n0jKYpbI4curhPsxAI2eJcRfBWqT2g</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Reed, Albert J.</creator><creator>Levedahl, J. William</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford University press</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Food Stamps and the Market Demand for Food</title><author>Reed, Albert J. ; Levedahl, J. William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4949-9786193069b360b4e4866667f84ab69f789970ee23682df6b687977be18c1ffb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Agricultural and food market</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Cash</topic><topic>Cash income</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Data aggregation</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Demand analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Elasticity of demand</topic><topic>Electronics benefit transfer</topic><topic>exact aggregation</topic><topic>food assistance policy</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food demand</topic><topic>Food prices</topic><topic>Food stamps</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housing demand</topic><topic>Income estimates</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Market demand</topic><topic>market food demand</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Q11</topic><topic>Q18</topic><topic>SNAP</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Welfare policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reed, Albert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levedahl, J. William</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reed, Albert J.</au><au>Levedahl, J. William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Food Stamps and the Market Demand for Food</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1392</spage><epage>1400</epage><pages>1392-1400</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><coden>AJAEBA</coden><abstract>This article compares estimates of disaggregated market food demand responses to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits based on exact nonlinear aggregation to responses based on linear aggregation. By accounting for income inequality, nonlinear aggregation implies that only the households that receive benefits contribute to market demand responses. In contrast, linear aggregation presumes all households receive benefits and thus contribute to the market demand response. The consequence is that nonlinear market estimates are smaller than the linear estimates by roughly the fraction of households that receive benefits.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ajae/aaq069</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9092
ispartof American journal of agricultural economics, 2010-10, Vol.92 (5), p.1392-1400
issn 0002-9092
1467-8276
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851746081
source EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Aggregation
Agricultural and food market
Agricultural economics
AIDS
Cash
Cash income
Comparative analysis
Data aggregation
Demand
Demand analysis
Economic models
Elasticity of demand
Electronics benefit transfer
exact aggregation
food assistance policy
Food consumption
Food demand
Food prices
Food stamps
Food supply
Households
Housing demand
Income estimates
Income inequality
Market demand
market food demand
Nutrition
Q11
Q18
SNAP
Studies
U.S.A
Welfare policy
title Food Stamps and the Market Demand for Food
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A58%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Food%20Stamps%20and%20the%20Market%20Demand%20for%20Food&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Reed,%20Albert%20J.&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1392&rft.epage=1400&rft.pages=1392-1400&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft.coden=AJAEBA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajae/aaq069&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40931094%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4949-9786193069b360b4e4866667f84ab69f789970ee23682df6b687977be18c1ffb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857515408&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40931094&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ajae/aaq069&rfr_iscdi=true