Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia?

Objectives: In recent years advanced technologies, such as Global Positioning Systems (GPS), allow for tracking of human spatial activity and provide the ability to intervene to manage that activity. The purpose of this study is to examine the issue of who should decide about the use of electronic t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aging & mental health 2011, Vol.15 (1), p.78-84
Main Authors: Landau, Ruth, Auslander, Gail K, Werner, Shirli, Shoval, Noam, Heinik, Jeremia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Autonomy
Care of the aged
Caregivers
Carers
Caring
Decision Making
Dementia
Diseases
electronic tracking
Ethical dilemmas
Family
Family relations
Female
Geographic Information Systems
GPS
Humans
Israel
Male
Middle Aged
Social Responsibility
Social workers
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tracking
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives: In recent years advanced technologies, such as Global Positioning Systems (GPS), allow for tracking of human spatial activity and provide the ability to intervene to manage that activity. The purpose of this study is to examine the issue of who should decide about the use of electronic tracking using GPS for people with dementia. Methods: Based on quantitative data collected from 296 participants comprising cognitively intact elderly, family caregivers of people with dementia, social workers, other professionals, and social work students, study participants were asked to rate nine different potential decision-makers to make this decision. Results: The results show that figures inside the family, particularly the spouse or the most involved family caregiver, were perceived more important in the decision-making process than figures outside the family, whereas the person with dementia was ranked third in the order of the figures. Since the decision to use GPS for tracking raises the ethical dilemma of personal safety versus autonomy and privacy of people with dementia, the findings seem to indicate that the reluctance of professional caregivers to assist family caregivers to make this decision is experienced as frustrating. Conclusions: The findings imply that in order to reach a balance between the wishes and interests of both people with dementia and their family caregivers, there is a need for more active involvement of the professional caregivers to facilitate the family decision-making process.
ISSN:1360-7863
1364-6915
DOI:10.1080/13607861003713166