Loading…

Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia?

Objectives: In recent years advanced technologies, such as Global Positioning Systems (GPS), allow for tracking of human spatial activity and provide the ability to intervene to manage that activity. The purpose of this study is to examine the issue of who should decide about the use of electronic t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aging & mental health 2011, Vol.15 (1), p.78-84
Main Authors: Landau, Ruth, Auslander, Gail K, Werner, Shirli, Shoval, Noam, Heinik, Jeremia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-978beed084df69a25b10aa163c4c75b4b64bb36f1a1974e8f0dc3c390ac1a5823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-978beed084df69a25b10aa163c4c75b4b64bb36f1a1974e8f0dc3c390ac1a5823
container_end_page 84
container_issue 1
container_start_page 78
container_title Aging & mental health
container_volume 15
creator Landau, Ruth
Auslander, Gail K
Werner, Shirli
Shoval, Noam
Heinik, Jeremia
description Objectives: In recent years advanced technologies, such as Global Positioning Systems (GPS), allow for tracking of human spatial activity and provide the ability to intervene to manage that activity. The purpose of this study is to examine the issue of who should decide about the use of electronic tracking using GPS for people with dementia. Methods: Based on quantitative data collected from 296 participants comprising cognitively intact elderly, family caregivers of people with dementia, social workers, other professionals, and social work students, study participants were asked to rate nine different potential decision-makers to make this decision. Results: The results show that figures inside the family, particularly the spouse or the most involved family caregiver, were perceived more important in the decision-making process than figures outside the family, whereas the person with dementia was ranked third in the order of the figures. Since the decision to use GPS for tracking raises the ethical dilemma of personal safety versus autonomy and privacy of people with dementia, the findings seem to indicate that the reluctance of professional caregivers to assist family caregivers to make this decision is experienced as frustrating. Conclusions: The findings imply that in order to reach a balance between the wishes and interests of both people with dementia and their family caregivers, there is a need for more active involvement of the professional caregivers to facilitate the family decision-making process.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13607861003713166
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851746334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>907153815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-978beed084df69a25b10aa163c4c75b4b64bb36f1a1974e8f0dc3c390ac1a5823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1r1jAYhoMobk5_gCeSM4-qz9OkSQOCyJibMFBQ8TAkabpG26YmLXP_3ry-Uw8GvkJCPrjumwcuQp4ivEBo4SUyAbIVCMAkMhTiHjkuf7wSCpv7v-5QFYAdkUc5fwUA5CgekqMaVM3bmh2Tiy9DpHmI29jRyXzzdB087bwLOcSZlrV7b9nT2NPzDx9pHxNdfFxGT6_DOhR08vMazOvH5EFvxuyf3J4n5PPbs0-nF9Xl-_N3p28uK9fUsFZKttb7Dlre9UKZurEIxqBgjjvZWG4Ft5aJHg0qyX3bQ-eYYwqMQ9OUkU_I833vkuL3zedVTyE7P45m9nHLWoHEhrVlHyJbUTcKxf-QDUouGOOHSd4yZAA7EvekSzHn5Hu9pDCZdKMR9M6evmOvZJ7dtm928t2fxG9dBXi1B8JcREzmOqax06u5GWPqk5mLNs3-1S8Pxu-k9Ppj_TtZuOqctsGOIV4lswzB6VoqxX4CyJrBkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>848313004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Landau, Ruth ; Auslander, Gail K ; Werner, Shirli ; Shoval, Noam ; Heinik, Jeremia</creator><creatorcontrib>Landau, Ruth ; Auslander, Gail K ; Werner, Shirli ; Shoval, Noam ; Heinik, Jeremia</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: In recent years advanced technologies, such as Global Positioning Systems (GPS), allow for tracking of human spatial activity and provide the ability to intervene to manage that activity. The purpose of this study is to examine the issue of who should decide about the use of electronic tracking using GPS for people with dementia. Methods: Based on quantitative data collected from 296 participants comprising cognitively intact elderly, family caregivers of people with dementia, social workers, other professionals, and social work students, study participants were asked to rate nine different potential decision-makers to make this decision. Results: The results show that figures inside the family, particularly the spouse or the most involved family caregiver, were perceived more important in the decision-making process than figures outside the family, whereas the person with dementia was ranked third in the order of the figures. Since the decision to use GPS for tracking raises the ethical dilemma of personal safety versus autonomy and privacy of people with dementia, the findings seem to indicate that the reluctance of professional caregivers to assist family caregivers to make this decision is experienced as frustrating. Conclusions: The findings imply that in order to reach a balance between the wishes and interests of both people with dementia and their family caregivers, there is a need for more active involvement of the professional caregivers to facilitate the family decision-making process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-7863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-6915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13607861003713166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20924823</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMHTFD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Autonomy ; Care of the aged ; Caregivers ; Carers ; Caring ; Decision Making ; Dementia ; Diseases ; electronic tracking ; Ethical dilemmas ; Family ; Family relations ; Female ; Geographic Information Systems ; GPS ; Humans ; Israel ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Social Responsibility ; Social workers ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tracking ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Aging &amp; mental health, 2011, Vol.15 (1), p.78-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-978beed084df69a25b10aa163c4c75b4b64bb36f1a1974e8f0dc3c390ac1a5823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-978beed084df69a25b10aa163c4c75b4b64bb36f1a1974e8f0dc3c390ac1a5823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,31000,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607861003713166$$D View full text (Access may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://igdc.huji.ac.il/home/Maagar/Details.aspx?AN=2799$$D View record in IGDC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20924823$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Landau, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auslander, Gail K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Shirli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoval, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinik, Jeremia</creatorcontrib><title>Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia?</title><title>Aging &amp; mental health</title><addtitle>Aging Ment Health</addtitle><description>Objectives: In recent years advanced technologies, such as Global Positioning Systems (GPS), allow for tracking of human spatial activity and provide the ability to intervene to manage that activity. The purpose of this study is to examine the issue of who should decide about the use of electronic tracking using GPS for people with dementia. Methods: Based on quantitative data collected from 296 participants comprising cognitively intact elderly, family caregivers of people with dementia, social workers, other professionals, and social work students, study participants were asked to rate nine different potential decision-makers to make this decision. Results: The results show that figures inside the family, particularly the spouse or the most involved family caregiver, were perceived more important in the decision-making process than figures outside the family, whereas the person with dementia was ranked third in the order of the figures. Since the decision to use GPS for tracking raises the ethical dilemma of personal safety versus autonomy and privacy of people with dementia, the findings seem to indicate that the reluctance of professional caregivers to assist family caregivers to make this decision is experienced as frustrating. Conclusions: The findings imply that in order to reach a balance between the wishes and interests of both people with dementia and their family caregivers, there is a need for more active involvement of the professional caregivers to facilitate the family decision-making process.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Care of the aged</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Carers</subject><subject>Caring</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>electronic tracking</subject><subject>Ethical dilemmas</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family relations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>Social workers</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1360-7863</issn><issn>1364-6915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1r1jAYhoMobk5_gCeSM4-qz9OkSQOCyJibMFBQ8TAkabpG26YmLXP_3ry-Uw8GvkJCPrjumwcuQp4ivEBo4SUyAbIVCMAkMhTiHjkuf7wSCpv7v-5QFYAdkUc5fwUA5CgekqMaVM3bmh2Tiy9DpHmI29jRyXzzdB087bwLOcSZlrV7b9nT2NPzDx9pHxNdfFxGT6_DOhR08vMazOvH5EFvxuyf3J4n5PPbs0-nF9Xl-_N3p28uK9fUsFZKttb7Dlre9UKZurEIxqBgjjvZWG4Ft5aJHg0qyX3bQ-eYYwqMQ9OUkU_I833vkuL3zedVTyE7P45m9nHLWoHEhrVlHyJbUTcKxf-QDUouGOOHSd4yZAA7EvekSzHn5Hu9pDCZdKMR9M6evmOvZJ7dtm928t2fxG9dBXi1B8JcREzmOqax06u5GWPqk5mLNs3-1S8Pxu-k9Ppj_TtZuOqctsGOIV4lswzB6VoqxX4CyJrBkw</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Landau, Ruth</creator><creator>Auslander, Gail K</creator><creator>Werner, Shirli</creator><creator>Shoval, Noam</creator><creator>Heinik, Jeremia</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AGDVQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia?</title><author>Landau, Ruth ; Auslander, Gail K ; Werner, Shirli ; Shoval, Noam ; Heinik, Jeremia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-978beed084df69a25b10aa163c4c75b4b64bb36f1a1974e8f0dc3c390ac1a5823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Care of the aged</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Carers</topic><topic>Caring</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>electronic tracking</topic><topic>Ethical dilemmas</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family relations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>Social workers</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Landau, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auslander, Gail K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Shirli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoval, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinik, Jeremia</creatorcontrib><collection>IGDC Bibliographic Database - מאגר לחקר ההזדקנות</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aging &amp; mental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Landau, Ruth</au><au>Auslander, Gail K</au><au>Werner, Shirli</au><au>Shoval, Noam</au><au>Heinik, Jeremia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia?</atitle><jtitle>Aging &amp; mental health</jtitle><addtitle>Aging Ment Health</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>78-84</pages><issn>1360-7863</issn><eissn>1364-6915</eissn><coden>AMHTFD</coden><abstract>Objectives: In recent years advanced technologies, such as Global Positioning Systems (GPS), allow for tracking of human spatial activity and provide the ability to intervene to manage that activity. The purpose of this study is to examine the issue of who should decide about the use of electronic tracking using GPS for people with dementia. Methods: Based on quantitative data collected from 296 participants comprising cognitively intact elderly, family caregivers of people with dementia, social workers, other professionals, and social work students, study participants were asked to rate nine different potential decision-makers to make this decision. Results: The results show that figures inside the family, particularly the spouse or the most involved family caregiver, were perceived more important in the decision-making process than figures outside the family, whereas the person with dementia was ranked third in the order of the figures. Since the decision to use GPS for tracking raises the ethical dilemma of personal safety versus autonomy and privacy of people with dementia, the findings seem to indicate that the reluctance of professional caregivers to assist family caregivers to make this decision is experienced as frustrating. Conclusions: The findings imply that in order to reach a balance between the wishes and interests of both people with dementia and their family caregivers, there is a need for more active involvement of the professional caregivers to facilitate the family decision-making process.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>20924823</pmid><doi>10.1080/13607861003713166</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1360-7863
ispartof Aging & mental health, 2011, Vol.15 (1), p.78-84
issn 1360-7863
1364-6915
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851746334
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis
subjects Adult
Aged
Autonomy
Care of the aged
Caregivers
Carers
Caring
Decision Making
Dementia
Diseases
electronic tracking
Ethical dilemmas
Family
Family relations
Female
Geographic Information Systems
GPS
Humans
Israel
Male
Middle Aged
Social Responsibility
Social workers
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tracking
Young Adult
title Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A15%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20should%20make%20the%20decision%20on%20the%20use%20of%20GPS%20for%20people%20with%20dementia?&rft.jtitle=Aging%20&%20mental%20health&rft.au=Landau,%20Ruth&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=78-84&rft.issn=1360-7863&rft.eissn=1364-6915&rft.coden=AMHTFD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13607861003713166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E907153815%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-978beed084df69a25b10aa163c4c75b4b64bb36f1a1974e8f0dc3c390ac1a5823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=848313004&rft_id=info:pmid/20924823&rfr_iscdi=true