Loading…

Retrieval of action names in aphasia: Effects of two cueing treatments

Background: The treatment of word-retrieval deficits in aphasia has most frequently focused on the retrieval of object names. The retrieval of action names has received relatively little attention in terms of rehabilitation despite the important role played by verbs in communication. Treatments that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aphasiology 2004-11, Vol.18 (11), p.979-1004
Main Authors: Wambaugh, Julie, Cameron, Rosalea, Kalinyak-Fliszar, Michelene, Nessler, Christina, Wright, Sandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: The treatment of word-retrieval deficits in aphasia has most frequently focused on the retrieval of object names. The retrieval of action names has received relatively little attention in terms of rehabilitation despite the important role played by verbs in communication. Treatments that have been successful in promoting improved object name retrieval cannot be assumed to also facilitate improved action name retrieval. Aims: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of two cueing treatments on the retrieval of action names with speakers with chronic aphasia. Methods & Procedures: The effects of two cueing treatments, Phonological Cueing Treatment (PCT) and Semantic Cueing Treatment (SCT), were examined with five speakers with aphasia. Treatment effects on action naming were measured using single subject, multiple baseline, and alternating treatments designs. Outcomes & Results: Results varied across participants. For two speakers, both treatments produced strong positive increases in naming, with effects being similar across treatments. For two other speakers, modest increases in correct naming were observed and for the remaining speaker, no increases were found. Conclusions: These findings indicate that PCT and SCT may have utility in facilitating action naming for some speakers with aphasia, but that the effects may vary across speakers.
ISSN:0268-7038
1464-5041
DOI:10.1080/02687030444000471