Loading…

Can angiography system with large-area flat digital panel induce higher irradiation in a patient during coronary angiography

Nowadays, angiography systems with flat digital panel are used in cardiology and invasive radiology as the detector of irradiation. The so called universal systems with a magnified panel are becoming more common. In this study we tried to find out whether in practice the increased surface area of de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medycyna pracy 2010, Vol.61 (5), p.521-525
Main Authors: Derkacz, Arkadiusz, Poreba, Rafał, Doroszko, Adrian, Magott-Derkacz, Agnieszka, Steinmetz-Beck, Aleksandra, Szełemej, Roman, Andrzejak, Ryszard
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 525
container_issue 5
container_start_page 521
container_title Medycyna pracy
container_volume 61
creator Derkacz, Arkadiusz
Poreba, Rafał
Doroszko, Adrian
Magott-Derkacz, Agnieszka
Steinmetz-Beck, Aleksandra
Szełemej, Roman
Andrzejak, Ryszard
description Nowadays, angiography systems with flat digital panel are used in cardiology and invasive radiology as the detector of irradiation. The so called universal systems with a magnified panel are becoming more common. In this study we tried to find out whether in practice the increased surface area of detectors may increase the absorption dose in a patient. The study included 486 patients who underwent coronary angiography carried out by the same physicians. In 268 subjects the procedure was performed in cathlab A equipped with a cardiac angiography system, whereas in 218 subjects in cathlab B using universal angiography system. In the study the absorbed dose of irradiation by the patient was determined and its ratio to body mass, body mass index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA) was evaluated. The mean dose absorbed by the person under study did not differ between both catheterization laboratories. Similarly, there were no differences in the ratio of the absorbed dose and BMI. But the comparison of the ratio of the absorbed dose and the body mass showed significantly higher values in cathlab A, where. higher values of the ratio of the absorbed dose and BSA were also found (p < 0.01). In the present study it was found that the use of universal angiography systems with a larger surface area of the detecting panel is not connected with the increase in the irradiation dose absorbed by the patent during coronary angiography as compared with classical cardiac angiography systems.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853677621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>853677621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-b5b0b73fa6ac2cc9fffb214ae8a212f4ecd757b9c7a13b7abe52389593e9659f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LxDAQxXNQ3HX1K0hungpt0rTNURb_wYIXPZdJOmkjaVqTFFnww1twhT3NYX5v3rx3QbZ5WYlMNJJvyHWMn3kucs7kFdmwgpeFYPmW_OzBU_C9nfoA83Ck8RgTjvTbpoE6CD1mEBCocZBoZ3ubwNEZPDpqfbdopIPtBwzUhgCdhWQnv24orFCy6FfREqzvqZ7C5CEcz81uyKUBF_H2NHfk4-nxff-SHd6eX_cPh2wuyjxlSqhc1dxABZppLY0xihUlYAOsYKZE3dWiVlLXUHBVg0LBeCOF5CgrIQ3fkfu_u3OYvhaMqR1t1OjcmmNaYtsIXtV1tbayI3cnclEjdu0c7Lg-3f4Xxn8BQjNpgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>853677621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can angiography system with large-area flat digital panel induce higher irradiation in a patient during coronary angiography</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Derkacz, Arkadiusz ; Poreba, Rafał ; Doroszko, Adrian ; Magott-Derkacz, Agnieszka ; Steinmetz-Beck, Aleksandra ; Szełemej, Roman ; Andrzejak, Ryszard</creator><creatorcontrib>Derkacz, Arkadiusz ; Poreba, Rafał ; Doroszko, Adrian ; Magott-Derkacz, Agnieszka ; Steinmetz-Beck, Aleksandra ; Szełemej, Roman ; Andrzejak, Ryszard</creatorcontrib><description>Nowadays, angiography systems with flat digital panel are used in cardiology and invasive radiology as the detector of irradiation. The so called universal systems with a magnified panel are becoming more common. In this study we tried to find out whether in practice the increased surface area of detectors may increase the absorption dose in a patient. The study included 486 patients who underwent coronary angiography carried out by the same physicians. In 268 subjects the procedure was performed in cathlab A equipped with a cardiac angiography system, whereas in 218 subjects in cathlab B using universal angiography system. In the study the absorbed dose of irradiation by the patient was determined and its ratio to body mass, body mass index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA) was evaluated. The mean dose absorbed by the person under study did not differ between both catheterization laboratories. Similarly, there were no differences in the ratio of the absorbed dose and BMI. But the comparison of the ratio of the absorbed dose and the body mass showed significantly higher values in cathlab A, where. higher values of the ratio of the absorbed dose and BSA were also found (p &lt; 0.01). In the present study it was found that the use of universal angiography systems with a larger surface area of the detecting panel is not connected with the increase in the irradiation dose absorbed by the patent during coronary angiography as compared with classical cardiac angiography systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0465-5893</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21341520</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>Poland</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis ; Body Mass Index ; Coronary Angiography - instrumentation ; Environmental Exposure - analysis ; Environmental Monitoring ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiation Dosage</subject><ispartof>Medycyna pracy, 2010, Vol.61 (5), p.521-525</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,36990</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21341520$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Derkacz, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poreba, Rafał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doroszko, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magott-Derkacz, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinmetz-Beck, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szełemej, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrzejak, Ryszard</creatorcontrib><title>Can angiography system with large-area flat digital panel induce higher irradiation in a patient during coronary angiography</title><title>Medycyna pracy</title><addtitle>Med Pr</addtitle><description>Nowadays, angiography systems with flat digital panel are used in cardiology and invasive radiology as the detector of irradiation. The so called universal systems with a magnified panel are becoming more common. In this study we tried to find out whether in practice the increased surface area of detectors may increase the absorption dose in a patient. The study included 486 patients who underwent coronary angiography carried out by the same physicians. In 268 subjects the procedure was performed in cathlab A equipped with a cardiac angiography system, whereas in 218 subjects in cathlab B using universal angiography system. In the study the absorbed dose of irradiation by the patient was determined and its ratio to body mass, body mass index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA) was evaluated. The mean dose absorbed by the person under study did not differ between both catheterization laboratories. Similarly, there were no differences in the ratio of the absorbed dose and BMI. But the comparison of the ratio of the absorbed dose and the body mass showed significantly higher values in cathlab A, where. higher values of the ratio of the absorbed dose and BSA were also found (p &lt; 0.01). In the present study it was found that the use of universal angiography systems with a larger surface area of the detecting panel is not connected with the increase in the irradiation dose absorbed by the patent during coronary angiography as compared with classical cardiac angiography systems.</description><subject>Air Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><issn>0465-5893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE9LxDAQxXNQ3HX1K0hungpt0rTNURb_wYIXPZdJOmkjaVqTFFnww1twhT3NYX5v3rx3QbZ5WYlMNJJvyHWMn3kucs7kFdmwgpeFYPmW_OzBU_C9nfoA83Ck8RgTjvTbpoE6CD1mEBCocZBoZ3ubwNEZPDpqfbdopIPtBwzUhgCdhWQnv24orFCy6FfREqzvqZ7C5CEcz81uyKUBF_H2NHfk4-nxff-SHd6eX_cPh2wuyjxlSqhc1dxABZppLY0xihUlYAOsYKZE3dWiVlLXUHBVg0LBeCOF5CgrIQ3fkfu_u3OYvhaMqR1t1OjcmmNaYtsIXtV1tbayI3cnclEjdu0c7Lg-3f4Xxn8BQjNpgg</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Derkacz, Arkadiusz</creator><creator>Poreba, Rafał</creator><creator>Doroszko, Adrian</creator><creator>Magott-Derkacz, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Steinmetz-Beck, Aleksandra</creator><creator>Szełemej, Roman</creator><creator>Andrzejak, Ryszard</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Can angiography system with large-area flat digital panel induce higher irradiation in a patient during coronary angiography</title><author>Derkacz, Arkadiusz ; Poreba, Rafał ; Doroszko, Adrian ; Magott-Derkacz, Agnieszka ; Steinmetz-Beck, Aleksandra ; Szełemej, Roman ; Andrzejak, Ryszard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-b5b0b73fa6ac2cc9fffb214ae8a212f4ecd757b9c7a13b7abe52389593e9659f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Derkacz, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poreba, Rafał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doroszko, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magott-Derkacz, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinmetz-Beck, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szełemej, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrzejak, Ryszard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medycyna pracy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Derkacz, Arkadiusz</au><au>Poreba, Rafał</au><au>Doroszko, Adrian</au><au>Magott-Derkacz, Agnieszka</au><au>Steinmetz-Beck, Aleksandra</au><au>Szełemej, Roman</au><au>Andrzejak, Ryszard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can angiography system with large-area flat digital panel induce higher irradiation in a patient during coronary angiography</atitle><jtitle>Medycyna pracy</jtitle><addtitle>Med Pr</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>521-525</pages><issn>0465-5893</issn><abstract>Nowadays, angiography systems with flat digital panel are used in cardiology and invasive radiology as the detector of irradiation. The so called universal systems with a magnified panel are becoming more common. In this study we tried to find out whether in practice the increased surface area of detectors may increase the absorption dose in a patient. The study included 486 patients who underwent coronary angiography carried out by the same physicians. In 268 subjects the procedure was performed in cathlab A equipped with a cardiac angiography system, whereas in 218 subjects in cathlab B using universal angiography system. In the study the absorbed dose of irradiation by the patient was determined and its ratio to body mass, body mass index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA) was evaluated. The mean dose absorbed by the person under study did not differ between both catheterization laboratories. Similarly, there were no differences in the ratio of the absorbed dose and BMI. But the comparison of the ratio of the absorbed dose and the body mass showed significantly higher values in cathlab A, where. higher values of the ratio of the absorbed dose and BSA were also found (p &lt; 0.01). In the present study it was found that the use of universal angiography systems with a larger surface area of the detecting panel is not connected with the increase in the irradiation dose absorbed by the patent during coronary angiography as compared with classical cardiac angiography systems.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pmid>21341520</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0465-5893
ispartof Medycyna pracy, 2010, Vol.61 (5), p.521-525
issn 0465-5893
language pol
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853677621
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Air Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis
Body Mass Index
Coronary Angiography - instrumentation
Environmental Exposure - analysis
Environmental Monitoring
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Radiation Dosage
title Can angiography system with large-area flat digital panel induce higher irradiation in a patient during coronary angiography
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T12%3A11%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20angiography%20system%20with%20large-area%20flat%20digital%20panel%20induce%20higher%20irradiation%20in%20a%20patient%20during%20coronary%20angiography&rft.jtitle=Medycyna%20pracy&rft.au=Derkacz,%20Arkadiusz&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=521-525&rft.issn=0465-5893&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E853677621%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-b5b0b73fa6ac2cc9fffb214ae8a212f4ecd757b9c7a13b7abe52389593e9659f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=853677621&rft_id=info:pmid/21341520&rfr_iscdi=true