Analysing Social Inequality: A Critique of Two Recent Contributions from Economics and Epidemiology

Two recent studies focusing on issues of social inequality are reviewed, one the work largely of economists, the other of epidemiologists. In both cases, the conceptualization and in turn the analysis of social inequality appear inadequate. In the case of the economists, concerned with whether, unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European sociological review 2010-12, Vol.26 (6), p.731-744
Main Author: GOLDTHORPE, John H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Classes, stratification, mobility
Conceptualization
Economic sociology
Economists
Epidemiology
Health
Health Problems
Income Distribution
Income Inequality
Research trends
Social conditions
Social Inequality
Social organization. Social system. Social structure
Social Stratification
Sociology
Sociology of economy and development
Standard of living. Income
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two recent studies focusing on issues of social inequality are reviewed, one the work largely of economists, the other of epidemiologists. In both cases, the conceptualization and in turn the analysis of social inequality appear inadequate. In the case of the economists, concerned with whether, under New Labour, Britain has become a more equal society, attention is concentrated on changes in income distributions to the neglect of the distinction between the attributional and the relational aspects of inequality. The analyses presented reveal serious gaps and a lack of integration that could have been avoided through their grounding in some concept of class stratification. In the case of the epidemiologists, concerned to show a contextual effect of social inequality on population health and other outcomes, stratification is treated as one-dimensional, with no distinction being recognized between class and status. It is in fact status rather than the material inequalities associated with class that are seen as crucial in mediating the supposed contextual effect. But the inferences that are made from the available data on income distributions to inequalities of status and their consequences are often of a doubtful kind.
ISSN:0266-7215
1468-2672
DOI:10.1093/esr/jcp046