Loading…

Sutureless tympanoplasty using acellular dermis

Abstract Objective A prospective randomized unblinded controlled trial was conducted by comparing acellular dermis with temporalis fascia as graft materials in tympanoplasty (type 1) in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, graft success rate, and audiologic outcome. Study design Forty-two pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of otolaryngology 2011-03, Vol.32 (2), p.96-99
Main Authors: Raj, Anoop, MBBS, MS, Sayal, Ankush, MBBS, MS, Rathore, P.K., MBBS, MS, Meher, Ravi, MBBS, MS, DNB
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective A prospective randomized unblinded controlled trial was conducted by comparing acellular dermis with temporalis fascia as graft materials in tympanoplasty (type 1) in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, graft success rate, and audiologic outcome. Study design Forty-two patients with (inactive) chronic suppurative otitis media of tubotympanic type were randomized, matched, and divided equally into 2 groups of 21 each. One group underwent tympanoplasty (type 1) via transcanal route using temporalis fascia graft and the other using acellular dermis. Both groups were compared for operative time, postoperative pain, graft success rate, and audiologic improvement in hearing. Results There was a statistically significant reduction in operative time ( P < .05) and postoperative pain ( P < .05) in the acellular dermis group. However, there was no statistical difference in graft success rate ( P > .05) and hearing improvement ( P > .05) between both the groups. Conclusion Results of tympanoplasty using acellular dermis as graft material are comparable to that using temporalis fascia in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement. However, tympanoplasty using acellular dermis has the advantage of shorter operative time and lesser postoperative pain.
ISSN:0196-0709
1532-818X
DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.10.007