Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity

Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, & Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of family psychology 2011-02, Vol.25 (1), p.77-85
Main Authors: Shallcross, Sandra L, Howland, Maryhope, Bemis, Jenna, Simpson, Jeffry A, Frazier, Patricia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anxiety
Anxiety - psychology
Anxiety disorders
Attachment
Attachment Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Couple and family
Couples
Courtship - psychology
Dating
Experiences (Events)
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Insecurity
Internet
Interpersonal Communication
Interpersonal Interaction
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Object Attachment
Perceptions
Personal relationships
Positive life events
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Relationship Quality
Responsiveness
Romantic relationships
Social interaction
Social Perception
Social psychology
Students
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Truth Disclosure
Universities
Videotape Recording
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, & Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event in the life of each partner. Ratings of perceived responsiveness were made by both the romantic partner who disclosed a positive event and his/her responding partner. Trained observers then rated each videotaped interaction. More avoidantly attached responders reported being and were rated by coders as less responsive, particularly if their disclosing partners were more anxiously attached. Avoidantly attached individuals also underestimated their partners' responsiveness relative to observer ratings. Anxious responders underestimated their own responsiveness when their disclosing partners were more avoidantly attached. These results indicate that insecurely attached individuals are relatively less likely to be responsive and to perceive responsiveness in capitalization interactions than are more securely attached individuals. This is especially true when highly anxious and highly avoidant individuals are relationship partners.
ISSN:0893-3200
1939-1293
DOI:10.1037/a0021876