THE LANGUAGE OF INCONSISTENCY

This paper presents an interpretation of inconsistent remarks which subjects made in explaining their erroneous solutions to a difficult deductive problem. Four half‐masked cards of the following types were presented: (a) a number in the lower half, (b) a blank in the upper half, (c) a letter in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The British journal of psychology 1974-11, Vol.65 (4), p.537-546
Main Authors: WASON, P. C., GOLDING, EVELYN
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4177-bd1836a22a99f9f849d57dfd7b55d154d433dd85089db6413f4ea9f4f29a9c643
cites
container_end_page 546
container_issue 4
container_start_page 537
container_title The British journal of psychology
container_volume 65
creator WASON, P. C.
GOLDING, EVELYN
description This paper presents an interpretation of inconsistent remarks which subjects made in explaining their erroneous solutions to a difficult deductive problem. Four half‐masked cards of the following types were presented: (a) a number in the lower half, (b) a blank in the upper half, (c) a letter in the upper half, and (d) a blank in the lower half. The problem is to say which cards need to be unmasked to determine decisively whether a sentence like ‘A letter is above each number’ is true or false. The original aim was to determine the possible effects of varying the order of the terms in the test sentence: the results were inconclusive. However, the subjects' protocols were of much greater interest. When asked to justify their incorrect solutions, their remarks clearly revealed the operation of irreversible thought processes. Three possible hypotheses about them are considered, and it is argued that one involving dissociation of attention is most plausible.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1974.tb01427.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85485249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1293468919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4177-bd1836a22a99f9f849d57dfd7b55d154d433dd85089db6413f4ea9f4f29a9c643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM1Kw0AURgdRsFYfQSgK7hLnN5NxZY1pWimJ0BZxdUkyCSSmTc202L69CS1duPNu5sKc7-NyELoj2CbtPJY2xZxbLlXCJkpye5Ngwqm0d2eod_o6Rz2MsbQIddQlujKmxJi0uOqh2_nYH0yHYbAYBv4gGg0moReFs8ls7ofe5zW6yOPKZDfHt48WI3_uja1pFEy84dRKOZHSSjRxmRNTGiuVq9zlSgupcy0TITQRXHPGtHYFdpVOHE5YzrNY5TynKlapw1kfPRx61039vc3MBpaFSbOqildZvTXgCu4KylUL3v8By3rbrNrbgFDFuOMq0lFPByptamOaLId1UyzjZg8EQ-cNSujkQCcHOm9w9Aa7Nvx8CP8UVbb_RxJe3qL3bm0rrENFYTbZ7lQRN1_gSCYFfIQBBEx4M_EqwGO_A7p_TA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1293468919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE LANGUAGE OF INCONSISTENCY</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>PAO JISC Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Periodicals Archive Online</source><creator>WASON, P. C. ; GOLDING, EVELYN</creator><creatorcontrib>WASON, P. C. ; GOLDING, EVELYN</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an interpretation of inconsistent remarks which subjects made in explaining their erroneous solutions to a difficult deductive problem. Four half‐masked cards of the following types were presented: (a) a number in the lower half, (b) a blank in the upper half, (c) a letter in the upper half, and (d) a blank in the lower half. The problem is to say which cards need to be unmasked to determine decisively whether a sentence like ‘A letter is above each number’ is true or false. The original aim was to determine the possible effects of varying the order of the terms in the test sentence: the results were inconclusive. However, the subjects' protocols were of much greater interest. When asked to justify their incorrect solutions, their remarks clearly revealed the operation of irreversible thought processes. Three possible hypotheses about them are considered, and it is argued that one involving dissociation of attention is most plausible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1269</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1974.tb01427.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSGAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>The British journal of psychology, 1974-11, Vol.65 (4), p.537-546</ispartof><rights>1974 The British Psychological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4177-bd1836a22a99f9f849d57dfd7b55d154d433dd85089db6413f4ea9f4f29a9c643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1293468919/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1293468919?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,13384,13411,27901,27902,31247,38591,38592,38726,38727,44730,44733,75041,75044</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>WASON, P. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLDING, EVELYN</creatorcontrib><title>THE LANGUAGE OF INCONSISTENCY</title><title>The British journal of psychology</title><description>This paper presents an interpretation of inconsistent remarks which subjects made in explaining their erroneous solutions to a difficult deductive problem. Four half‐masked cards of the following types were presented: (a) a number in the lower half, (b) a blank in the upper half, (c) a letter in the upper half, and (d) a blank in the lower half. The problem is to say which cards need to be unmasked to determine decisively whether a sentence like ‘A letter is above each number’ is true or false. The original aim was to determine the possible effects of varying the order of the terms in the test sentence: the results were inconclusive. However, the subjects' protocols were of much greater interest. When asked to justify their incorrect solutions, their remarks clearly revealed the operation of irreversible thought processes. Three possible hypotheses about them are considered, and it is argued that one involving dissociation of attention is most plausible.</description><issn>0007-1269</issn><issn>2044-8295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><sourceid>~PM</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkM1Kw0AURgdRsFYfQSgK7hLnN5NxZY1pWimJ0BZxdUkyCSSmTc202L69CS1duPNu5sKc7-NyELoj2CbtPJY2xZxbLlXCJkpye5Ngwqm0d2eod_o6Rz2MsbQIddQlujKmxJi0uOqh2_nYH0yHYbAYBv4gGg0moReFs8ls7ofe5zW6yOPKZDfHt48WI3_uja1pFEy84dRKOZHSSjRxmRNTGiuVq9zlSgupcy0TITQRXHPGtHYFdpVOHE5YzrNY5TynKlapw1kfPRx61039vc3MBpaFSbOqildZvTXgCu4KylUL3v8By3rbrNrbgFDFuOMq0lFPByptamOaLId1UyzjZg8EQ-cNSujkQCcHOm9w9Aa7Nvx8CP8UVbb_RxJe3qL3bm0rrENFYTbZ7lQRN1_gSCYFfIQBBEx4M_EqwGO_A7p_TA</recordid><startdate>197411</startdate><enddate>197411</enddate><creator>WASON, P. C.</creator><creator>GOLDING, EVELYN</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>ANHVI</scope><scope>FBAQO</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>~PN</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197411</creationdate><title>THE LANGUAGE OF INCONSISTENCY</title><author>WASON, P. C. ; GOLDING, EVELYN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4177-bd1836a22a99f9f849d57dfd7b55d154d433dd85089db6413f4ea9f4f29a9c643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WASON, P. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLDING, EVELYN</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 02</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO ProQuest</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online (1770-1995) [full page reproduction]</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online</collection><collection>PAO JISC Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The British journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WASON, P. C.</au><au>GOLDING, EVELYN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE LANGUAGE OF INCONSISTENCY</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of psychology</jtitle><date>1974-11</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>537</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>537-546</pages><issn>0007-1269</issn><eissn>2044-8295</eissn><coden>BJSGAE</coden><abstract>This paper presents an interpretation of inconsistent remarks which subjects made in explaining their erroneous solutions to a difficult deductive problem. Four half‐masked cards of the following types were presented: (a) a number in the lower half, (b) a blank in the upper half, (c) a letter in the upper half, and (d) a blank in the lower half. The problem is to say which cards need to be unmasked to determine decisively whether a sentence like ‘A letter is above each number’ is true or false. The original aim was to determine the possible effects of varying the order of the terms in the test sentence: the results were inconclusive. However, the subjects' protocols were of much greater interest. When asked to justify their incorrect solutions, their remarks clearly revealed the operation of irreversible thought processes. Three possible hypotheses about them are considered, and it is argued that one involving dissociation of attention is most plausible.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.2044-8295.1974.tb01427.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1269
ispartof The British journal of psychology, 1974-11, Vol.65 (4), p.537-546
issn 0007-1269
2044-8295
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85485249
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; PAO JISC Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Periodicals Archive Online
title THE LANGUAGE OF INCONSISTENCY
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A29%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20LANGUAGE%20OF%20INCONSISTENCY&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=WASON,%20P.%20C.&rft.date=1974-11&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=537&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=537-546&rft.issn=0007-1269&rft.eissn=2044-8295&rft.coden=BJSGAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1974.tb01427.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1293468919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4177-bd1836a22a99f9f849d57dfd7b55d154d433dd85089db6413f4ea9f4f29a9c643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1293468919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true