A Psycholinguistic Comparison of Speech, Dictation and Writing

Eighteen subjects responded to questions in an interview-like situation in which response modes (speaking, dictation, and writing) and question topics (personal v. impersonal) were systematically varied. Ten verbal indices consisting of extra-linguistic, syntactical, and content measures were the de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Language and speech 1975-01, Vol.18 (1), p.20-34
Main Authors: Blass, Thomas, Siegman, Aron W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adult
Communication
Humans
Psycholinguistics
Reaction Time
Speech
Verbal Behavior
Writing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Eighteen subjects responded to questions in an interview-like situation in which response modes (speaking, dictation, and writing) and question topics (personal v. impersonal) were systematically varied. Ten verbal indices consisting of extra-linguistic, syntactical, and content measures were the dependent variables. The speaking condition, in contrast to writing, yielded significantly faster Reaction Times and Production Rates, greater verbal Productivity, higher Silence Quotients, and lower Passive Verb Ratios, with dictation yielding intermediate scores on all the variables with the exception of Silence Quotient. The Ah Ratio was higher in dictation than in writing while the reverse was true for Non-Ah Ratio. Impersonal questions, in contrast to personal ones, evoked responses characterized by greater Productivity, faster Reaction Times, lower Silence Quotients and Non-Ah Ratios, higher Ah Ratios, longer and more superficial sentences. The encoding condition effects were interpreted as supporting the view that mode of communication influences the structure of the relations between interactants in a dyad. The topical effects supported the hypothesis of a greater reluctance to divulge personal rather than impersonal information, especially to a stranger.
ISSN:0023-8309
1756-6053
DOI:10.1177/002383097501800103