A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Aphasia

An extensive search of aphasia-treatment literature yielded 55 reports of clinical outcomes satisfying the essential criteria for inclusion in a meta-analysis. The results confirmed those of an earlier meta-analysis in demonstrating the utility of aphasia treatments, generally considered, for bringi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 1998-02, Vol.41 (1), p.172-187
Main Author: Robey, Randall R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acute Disease
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aphasia
Aphasia - diagnosis
Aphasia - rehabilitation
Brain damage
Chronic Disease
Clinical outcomes
Cognition & reasoning
Effect Size
Evidence
Humans
Indexing
Meta Analysis
Middle Aged
Outcomes
Reproducibility of Results
Sampling
Severity of Illness Index
Speech Language Pathology
Systematic review
Time Factors
Treatment
Treatment Outcome
Validity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-5007ded684659fb1bb61ba4fb2927663234203d1149a23ee81b81caaa83dcdbf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-5007ded684659fb1bb61ba4fb2927663234203d1149a23ee81b81caaa83dcdbf3
container_end_page 187
container_issue 1
container_start_page 172
container_title Journal of speech, language, and hearing research
container_volume 41
creator Robey, Randall R
description An extensive search of aphasia-treatment literature yielded 55 reports of clinical outcomes satisfying the essential criteria for inclusion in a meta-analysis. The results confirmed those of an earlier meta-analysis in demonstrating the utility of aphasia treatments, generally considered, for bringing about desirable clinical outcomes. Beyond the general case, the new findings address clinical utility in finer detail than was previously possible. Effects of treatment for aphasia are synthesized and assessed for each of four important dimensions: amount of treatment, type of treatment, severity of aphasia, and type of aphasia.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/jslhr.4101.172
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85509627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85509627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-5007ded684659fb1bb61ba4fb2927663234203d1149a23ee81b81caaa83dcdbf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovrfuhOLClR1zk7RJdg6DL1Dc6Dqk7a3N0MeYtIj_3owzuHDj3eTCd_IRcgg5AzoDKsT1MrSNnwmgMAPJdsghZJlKNVC2G3eqWSq4UgfkKIQljQMi3yf7WmguBT8kN_PkGUebznvbfgUXkqFOFq3rXWnb5GUay6HDkLg-GRtMXj3ascN-XFPzVWODsydkr7ZtwNPteUze7m5fFw_p08v942L-lJZCsTHNKJUVVrkSeabrAooih8KKumCayTznjAtGeQUgtGUcUUGhoLTWKl6VVVHzY3K56V354WPCMJrOhRLb1vY4TMGoLKM6Z_JfUGoJAvj_YCZlLrRmEbz4Ay6HyccPC4bFh8sI0gjNNlDphxA81mblXWf9lwFq1qbMjymzNmWiqXjhfNs6FR1Wv_hWTcyvNnnj3ptP59GEFWLZNGi9699_68ym7huSmJzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232375770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Aphasia</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Robey, Randall R</creator><creatorcontrib>Robey, Randall R</creatorcontrib><description>An extensive search of aphasia-treatment literature yielded 55 reports of clinical outcomes satisfying the essential criteria for inclusion in a meta-analysis. The results confirmed those of an earlier meta-analysis in demonstrating the utility of aphasia treatments, generally considered, for bringing about desirable clinical outcomes. Beyond the general case, the new findings address clinical utility in finer detail than was previously possible. Effects of treatment for aphasia are synthesized and assessed for each of four important dimensions: amount of treatment, type of treatment, severity of aphasia, and type of aphasia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4101.172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9493743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ASHA</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aphasia ; Aphasia - diagnosis ; Aphasia - rehabilitation ; Brain damage ; Chronic Disease ; Clinical outcomes ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Effect Size ; Evidence ; Humans ; Indexing ; Meta Analysis ; Middle Aged ; Outcomes ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sampling ; Severity of Illness Index ; Speech Language Pathology ; Systematic review ; Time Factors ; Treatment ; Treatment Outcome ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 1998-02, Vol.41 (1), p.172-187</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Feb 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-5007ded684659fb1bb61ba4fb2927663234203d1149a23ee81b81caaa83dcdbf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-5007ded684659fb1bb61ba4fb2927663234203d1149a23ee81b81caaa83dcdbf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/232375770/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/232375770?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31000,31269,31270,33611,33612,33877,33878,33911,33912,43733,43880,43896,74221,74397,74413</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9493743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robey, Randall R</creatorcontrib><title>A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Aphasia</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>An extensive search of aphasia-treatment literature yielded 55 reports of clinical outcomes satisfying the essential criteria for inclusion in a meta-analysis. The results confirmed those of an earlier meta-analysis in demonstrating the utility of aphasia treatments, generally considered, for bringing about desirable clinical outcomes. Beyond the general case, the new findings address clinical utility in finer detail than was previously possible. Effects of treatment for aphasia are synthesized and assessed for each of four important dimensions: amount of treatment, type of treatment, severity of aphasia, and type of aphasia.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Aphasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aphasia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Brain damage</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indexing</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Speech Language Pathology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovrfuhOLClR1zk7RJdg6DL1Dc6Dqk7a3N0MeYtIj_3owzuHDj3eTCd_IRcgg5AzoDKsT1MrSNnwmgMAPJdsghZJlKNVC2G3eqWSq4UgfkKIQljQMi3yf7WmguBT8kN_PkGUebznvbfgUXkqFOFq3rXWnb5GUay6HDkLg-GRtMXj3ascN-XFPzVWODsydkr7ZtwNPteUze7m5fFw_p08v942L-lJZCsTHNKJUVVrkSeabrAooih8KKumCayTznjAtGeQUgtGUcUUGhoLTWKl6VVVHzY3K56V354WPCMJrOhRLb1vY4TMGoLKM6Z_JfUGoJAvj_YCZlLrRmEbz4Ay6HyccPC4bFh8sI0gjNNlDphxA81mblXWf9lwFq1qbMjymzNmWiqXjhfNs6FR1Wv_hWTcyvNnnj3ptP59GEFWLZNGi9699_68ym7huSmJzg</recordid><startdate>19980201</startdate><enddate>19980201</enddate><creator>Robey, Randall R</creator><general>ASHA</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980201</creationdate><title>A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Aphasia</title><author>Robey, Randall R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-5007ded684659fb1bb61ba4fb2927663234203d1149a23ee81b81caaa83dcdbf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Aphasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aphasia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Brain damage</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indexing</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Speech Language Pathology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robey, Randall R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robey, Randall R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Aphasia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>1998-02-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>172-187</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>An extensive search of aphasia-treatment literature yielded 55 reports of clinical outcomes satisfying the essential criteria for inclusion in a meta-analysis. The results confirmed those of an earlier meta-analysis in demonstrating the utility of aphasia treatments, generally considered, for bringing about desirable clinical outcomes. Beyond the general case, the new findings address clinical utility in finer detail than was previously possible. Effects of treatment for aphasia are synthesized and assessed for each of four important dimensions: amount of treatment, type of treatment, severity of aphasia, and type of aphasia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ASHA</pub><pmid>9493743</pmid><doi>10.1044/jslhr.4101.172</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-4388
ispartof Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 1998-02, Vol.41 (1), p.172-187
issn 1092-4388
1558-9102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85509627
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Education Collection
subjects Acute Disease
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aphasia
Aphasia - diagnosis
Aphasia - rehabilitation
Brain damage
Chronic Disease
Clinical outcomes
Cognition & reasoning
Effect Size
Evidence
Humans
Indexing
Meta Analysis
Middle Aged
Outcomes
Reproducibility of Results
Sampling
Severity of Illness Index
Speech Language Pathology
Systematic review
Time Factors
Treatment
Treatment Outcome
Validity
title A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Aphasia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A44%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Aphasia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Robey,%20Randall%20R&rft.date=1998-02-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=172-187&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/jslhr.4101.172&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85509627%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-5007ded684659fb1bb61ba4fb2927663234203d1149a23ee81b81caaa83dcdbf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232375770&rft_id=info:pmid/9493743&rfr_iscdi=true