Linguistic validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure

This study reports the development and validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure. The equivalency of forms was based on the performance of 15 adults with aphasia on 12 operationally defined productive language variables including measures of (a) verbal productivity, (b) inform...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aphasiology 2000-05, Vol.14 (5-6), p.537-549
Main Authors: Doyle, Patrick J., McNeil, Malcolm R., Park, Grace, Goda, Amy, Rubenstein, Elaine, Spencer, Kristie, Carroll, Brian, Lustig, Amy, Szwarc, Leslie
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3bc31d4ec75d3b812ec40ca31933ef6b9e57b0a7eb7061f80f3d0f522433a62c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3bc31d4ec75d3b812ec40ca31933ef6b9e57b0a7eb7061f80f3d0f522433a62c3
container_end_page 549
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 537
container_title Aphasiology
container_volume 14
creator Doyle, Patrick J.
McNeil, Malcolm R.
Park, Grace
Goda, Amy
Rubenstein, Elaine
Spencer, Kristie
Carroll, Brian
Lustig, Amy
Szwarc, Leslie
description This study reports the development and validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure. The equivalency of forms was based on the performance of 15 adults with aphasia on 12 operationally defined productive language variables including measures of (a) verbal productivity, (b) information content, (c) grammatical well-formedness, (d) phoneme production, and (e) verbal disruptions. The results revealed no significant differences among the four forms of the test for any of the dependent measures, and strong, positive and significant correlations among forms for 11 of the 12 dependent measures. These results suggest that a wide variety of productive language variables can be reliably measured using parallel forms of the story-retelling procedure described herein.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/026870300401306
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85522786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85522786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3bc31d4ec75d3b812ec40ca31933ef6b9e57b0a7eb7061f80f3d0f522433a62c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUws2ZiCz3n8uGyoYovUYkFZstxbGTkxsV2gPz3OCpTJQTT6e7e797pEXJO4ZICgwUUNWsAAUqgCPUBmdGyLvMKSnpIZtM2T2t2TE5CeAOAAmo6I49r078OJkQjsw9hTSeicX3mdKbd4LOt8MJaZVPnN2EaiyxE58fMq6isTXC29U6qbvDqlBxpYYM6-6lz8nJ787y6z9dPdw-r63Uucclijq1E2pVKNlWHLaOFkiVIgXSJqHTdLlXVtCAa1TbpRc1AYwe6KooSUdSFxDm52N1Nzu-DCpFvTJDpG9ErNwTOqiRuWP0PIVbQMJqEi51QeheCV5pvvdkIP3IKfEqX76WbiGpHmH6KRnw6bzsexWid11700oR9hsevmLirPzn8zfQbHhaQ-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85350781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linguistic validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Doyle, Patrick J. ; McNeil, Malcolm R. ; Park, Grace ; Goda, Amy ; Rubenstein, Elaine ; Spencer, Kristie ; Carroll, Brian ; Lustig, Amy ; Szwarc, Leslie</creator><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Patrick J. ; McNeil, Malcolm R. ; Park, Grace ; Goda, Amy ; Rubenstein, Elaine ; Spencer, Kristie ; Carroll, Brian ; Lustig, Amy ; Szwarc, Leslie</creatorcontrib><description>This study reports the development and validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure. The equivalency of forms was based on the performance of 15 adults with aphasia on 12 operationally defined productive language variables including measures of (a) verbal productivity, (b) information content, (c) grammatical well-formedness, (d) phoneme production, and (e) verbal disruptions. The results revealed no significant differences among the four forms of the test for any of the dependent measures, and strong, positive and significant correlations among forms for 11 of the 12 dependent measures. These results suggest that a wide variety of productive language variables can be reliably measured using parallel forms of the story-retelling procedure described herein.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-7038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/026870300401306</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APHAEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>Aphasiology, 2000-05, Vol.14 (5-6), p.537-549</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3bc31d4ec75d3b812ec40ca31933ef6b9e57b0a7eb7061f80f3d0f522433a62c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3bc31d4ec75d3b812ec40ca31933ef6b9e57b0a7eb7061f80f3d0f522433a62c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,31249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Malcolm R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goda, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szwarc, Leslie</creatorcontrib><title>Linguistic validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure</title><title>Aphasiology</title><description>This study reports the development and validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure. The equivalency of forms was based on the performance of 15 adults with aphasia on 12 operationally defined productive language variables including measures of (a) verbal productivity, (b) information content, (c) grammatical well-formedness, (d) phoneme production, and (e) verbal disruptions. The results revealed no significant differences among the four forms of the test for any of the dependent measures, and strong, positive and significant correlations among forms for 11 of the 12 dependent measures. These results suggest that a wide variety of productive language variables can be reliably measured using parallel forms of the story-retelling procedure described herein.</description><issn>0268-7038</issn><issn>1464-5041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUws2ZiCz3n8uGyoYovUYkFZstxbGTkxsV2gPz3OCpTJQTT6e7e797pEXJO4ZICgwUUNWsAAUqgCPUBmdGyLvMKSnpIZtM2T2t2TE5CeAOAAmo6I49r078OJkQjsw9hTSeicX3mdKbd4LOt8MJaZVPnN2EaiyxE58fMq6isTXC29U6qbvDqlBxpYYM6-6lz8nJ787y6z9dPdw-r63Uucclijq1E2pVKNlWHLaOFkiVIgXSJqHTdLlXVtCAa1TbpRc1AYwe6KooSUdSFxDm52N1Nzu-DCpFvTJDpG9ErNwTOqiRuWP0PIVbQMJqEi51QeheCV5pvvdkIP3IKfEqX76WbiGpHmH6KRnw6bzsexWid11700oR9hsevmLirPzn8zfQbHhaQ-A</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Doyle, Patrick J.</creator><creator>McNeil, Malcolm R.</creator><creator>Park, Grace</creator><creator>Goda, Amy</creator><creator>Rubenstein, Elaine</creator><creator>Spencer, Kristie</creator><creator>Carroll, Brian</creator><creator>Lustig, Amy</creator><creator>Szwarc, Leslie</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Linguistic validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure</title><author>Doyle, Patrick J. ; McNeil, Malcolm R. ; Park, Grace ; Goda, Amy ; Rubenstein, Elaine ; Spencer, Kristie ; Carroll, Brian ; Lustig, Amy ; Szwarc, Leslie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3bc31d4ec75d3b812ec40ca31933ef6b9e57b0a7eb7061f80f3d0f522433a62c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Malcolm R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goda, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szwarc, Leslie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Aphasiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doyle, Patrick J.</au><au>McNeil, Malcolm R.</au><au>Park, Grace</au><au>Goda, Amy</au><au>Rubenstein, Elaine</au><au>Spencer, Kristie</au><au>Carroll, Brian</au><au>Lustig, Amy</au><au>Szwarc, Leslie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linguistic validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure</atitle><jtitle>Aphasiology</jtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>537</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>537-549</pages><issn>0268-7038</issn><eissn>1464-5041</eissn><coden>APHAEA</coden><abstract>This study reports the development and validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure. The equivalency of forms was based on the performance of 15 adults with aphasia on 12 operationally defined productive language variables including measures of (a) verbal productivity, (b) information content, (c) grammatical well-formedness, (d) phoneme production, and (e) verbal disruptions. The results revealed no significant differences among the four forms of the test for any of the dependent measures, and strong, positive and significant correlations among forms for 11 of the 12 dependent measures. These results suggest that a wide variety of productive language variables can be reliably measured using parallel forms of the story-retelling procedure described herein.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/026870300401306</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-7038
ispartof Aphasiology, 2000-05, Vol.14 (5-6), p.537-549
issn 0268-7038
1464-5041
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85522786
source Taylor & Francis; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
title Linguistic validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A27%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linguistic%20validation%20of%20four%20parallel%20forms%20of%20a%20story%20retelling%20procedure&rft.jtitle=Aphasiology&rft.au=Doyle,%20Patrick%20J.&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=537&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=537-549&rft.issn=0268-7038&rft.eissn=1464-5041&rft.coden=APHAEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/026870300401306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85522786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3bc31d4ec75d3b812ec40ca31933ef6b9e57b0a7eb7061f80f3d0f522433a62c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85350781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true