Acquisition of New “Words” in Normal Subjects: A Suggestion for the Treatment of Anomia

The study explores the efficacy of three learning methods in normal controls. Thirty subjects, randomly assigned to the repetition, reading aloud, or orthographic cueing method, were asked to learn 30 new “words” (legal nonwords arbitrarily assigned to 30 different pictures); 30 further new “words”...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and language 2001-04, Vol.77 (1), p.45-59
Main Authors: Basso, Anna, Marangolo, Paola, Piras, Fabrizio, Galluzzi, Claudia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Anomia - therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Random Allocation
Reeducation. Readaptation. Sociotherapy
Remedial Teaching
Treatment Outcome
Treatments
Verbal Learning
Vocabulary
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-ba482b036bdb4cabc404076d190898308485575b11f4835e58f47409cffb1fb93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-ba482b036bdb4cabc404076d190898308485575b11f4835e58f47409cffb1fb93
container_end_page 59
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Brain and language
container_volume 77
creator Basso, Anna
Marangolo, Paola
Piras, Fabrizio
Galluzzi, Claudia
description The study explores the efficacy of three learning methods in normal controls. Thirty subjects, randomly assigned to the repetition, reading aloud, or orthographic cueing method, were asked to learn 30 new “words” (legal nonwords arbitrarily assigned to 30 different pictures); 30 further new “words” were used as controls. Number of trials to criterion was significantly lower, and number of words remembered at follow-up was significantly higher for the orthographic cueing method. Two aphasic patients with damage to the output lexicons were also rehabilitated with the same three methods. In both patients the orthographic cueing method was significantly more efficacious. The differences in learning efficacy of the three methods are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/brln.2000.2422
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85539430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093934X00924222</els_id><sourcerecordid>85539430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-ba482b036bdb4cabc404076d190898308485575b11f4835e58f47409cffb1fb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rFTEUhkOptNfqtssSKLib68kkmUm6uxS_oNSFFQUXIckkNWVm0iYzirv-EP1z_SVmvJe6ElfnLJ735eVB6JjAmgA0L03qx3UNAOua1fUeWhGQUNWE8320ApC0kpR9PkRPc74BIIQJcoAOCalZ23C-Ql829m4OOUwhjjh6fOm-44f7n59i6vLD_S8cRnwZ06B7_GE2N85O-Qxvyn997fKfjI8JT18dvkpOT4Mbp6VlM8Yh6Gfoidd9ds939wh9fP3q6vxtdfH-zbvzzUWlKW2nymgmagO0MZ1hVhvLgEHbdESCkIKCYILzlhtCPBOUOy48axlI670h3kh6hF5se29TvJvLLjWEbF3f69HFOasSp5JR-C_YNrJpJaUFXG9Bm2LOyXl1m8Kg0w9FQC3e1eJdLd7V4r0ETnbNsxlc9xffiS7A6Q7Q2ereJz3akB85STnUpFBiS7mi61twSWUb3GhdF1Jxr7oY_rXgN2dMnok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76967933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acquisition of New “Words” in Normal Subjects: A Suggestion for the Treatment of Anomia</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Basso, Anna ; Marangolo, Paola ; Piras, Fabrizio ; Galluzzi, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Basso, Anna ; Marangolo, Paola ; Piras, Fabrizio ; Galluzzi, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>The study explores the efficacy of three learning methods in normal controls. Thirty subjects, randomly assigned to the repetition, reading aloud, or orthographic cueing method, were asked to learn 30 new “words” (legal nonwords arbitrarily assigned to 30 different pictures); 30 further new “words” were used as controls. Number of trials to criterion was significantly lower, and number of words remembered at follow-up was significantly higher for the orthographic cueing method. Two aphasic patients with damage to the output lexicons were also rehabilitated with the same three methods. In both patients the orthographic cueing method was significantly more efficacious. The differences in learning efficacy of the three methods are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/brln.2000.2422</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11247655</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRLGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anomia - therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Random Allocation ; Reeducation. Readaptation. Sociotherapy ; Remedial Teaching ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatments ; Verbal Learning ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Brain and language, 2001-04, Vol.77 (1), p.45-59</ispartof><rights>2001 Academic Press</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-ba482b036bdb4cabc404076d190898308485575b11f4835e58f47409cffb1fb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-ba482b036bdb4cabc404076d190898308485575b11f4835e58f47409cffb1fb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=935021$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11247655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basso, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangolo, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piras, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galluzzi, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>Acquisition of New “Words” in Normal Subjects: A Suggestion for the Treatment of Anomia</title><title>Brain and language</title><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><description>The study explores the efficacy of three learning methods in normal controls. Thirty subjects, randomly assigned to the repetition, reading aloud, or orthographic cueing method, were asked to learn 30 new “words” (legal nonwords arbitrarily assigned to 30 different pictures); 30 further new “words” were used as controls. Number of trials to criterion was significantly lower, and number of words remembered at follow-up was significantly higher for the orthographic cueing method. Two aphasic patients with damage to the output lexicons were also rehabilitated with the same three methods. In both patients the orthographic cueing method was significantly more efficacious. The differences in learning efficacy of the three methods are discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anomia - therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Reeducation. Readaptation. Sociotherapy</subject><subject>Remedial Teaching</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1rFTEUhkOptNfqtssSKLib68kkmUm6uxS_oNSFFQUXIckkNWVm0iYzirv-EP1z_SVmvJe6ElfnLJ735eVB6JjAmgA0L03qx3UNAOua1fUeWhGQUNWE8320ApC0kpR9PkRPc74BIIQJcoAOCalZ23C-Ql829m4OOUwhjjh6fOm-44f7n59i6vLD_S8cRnwZ06B7_GE2N85O-Qxvyn997fKfjI8JT18dvkpOT4Mbp6VlM8Yh6Gfoidd9ds939wh9fP3q6vxtdfH-zbvzzUWlKW2nymgmagO0MZ1hVhvLgEHbdESCkIKCYILzlhtCPBOUOy48axlI670h3kh6hF5se29TvJvLLjWEbF3f69HFOasSp5JR-C_YNrJpJaUFXG9Bm2LOyXl1m8Kg0w9FQC3e1eJdLd7V4r0ETnbNsxlc9xffiS7A6Q7Q2ereJz3akB85STnUpFBiS7mi61twSWUb3GhdF1Jxr7oY_rXgN2dMnok</recordid><startdate>200104</startdate><enddate>200104</enddate><creator>Basso, Anna</creator><creator>Marangolo, Paola</creator><creator>Piras, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Galluzzi, Claudia</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200104</creationdate><title>Acquisition of New “Words” in Normal Subjects: A Suggestion for the Treatment of Anomia</title><author>Basso, Anna ; Marangolo, Paola ; Piras, Fabrizio ; Galluzzi, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-ba482b036bdb4cabc404076d190898308485575b11f4835e58f47409cffb1fb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anomia - therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Reeducation. Readaptation. Sociotherapy</topic><topic>Remedial Teaching</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basso, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangolo, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piras, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galluzzi, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basso, Anna</au><au>Marangolo, Paola</au><au>Piras, Fabrizio</au><au>Galluzzi, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acquisition of New “Words” in Normal Subjects: A Suggestion for the Treatment of Anomia</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><date>2001-04</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>45-59</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><coden>BRLGAZ</coden><abstract>The study explores the efficacy of three learning methods in normal controls. Thirty subjects, randomly assigned to the repetition, reading aloud, or orthographic cueing method, were asked to learn 30 new “words” (legal nonwords arbitrarily assigned to 30 different pictures); 30 further new “words” were used as controls. Number of trials to criterion was significantly lower, and number of words remembered at follow-up was significantly higher for the orthographic cueing method. Two aphasic patients with damage to the output lexicons were also rehabilitated with the same three methods. In both patients the orthographic cueing method was significantly more efficacious. The differences in learning efficacy of the three methods are discussed.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11247655</pmid><doi>10.1006/brln.2000.2422</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-934X
ispartof Brain and language, 2001-04, Vol.77 (1), p.45-59
issn 0093-934X
1090-2155
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85539430
source Elsevier; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Adult
Anomia - therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Random Allocation
Reeducation. Readaptation. Sociotherapy
Remedial Teaching
Treatment Outcome
Treatments
Verbal Learning
Vocabulary
title Acquisition of New “Words” in Normal Subjects: A Suggestion for the Treatment of Anomia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A30%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acquisition%20of%20New%20%E2%80%9CWords%E2%80%9D%20in%20Normal%20Subjects:%20A%20Suggestion%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Anomia&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=Basso,%20Anna&rft.date=2001-04&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=45-59&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft.coden=BRLGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/brln.2000.2422&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85539430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-ba482b036bdb4cabc404076d190898308485575b11f4835e58f47409cffb1fb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76967933&rft_id=info:pmid/11247655&rfr_iscdi=true