Loading…
Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants
How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cognitive psychology 1992-04, Vol.24 (2), p.252-293 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73 |
container_end_page | 293 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 252 |
container_title | Cognitive psychology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Jusczyk, Peter W Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy Kemler Nelson, Deborah G Kennedy, Lori J Woodward, Amanda Piwoz, Julie |
description | How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not 6 month olds, are attuned to cues that differentially mark speech that is artificially segmented at linguistically COINCIDENT as opposed to NONCOINCIDENT boundaries (Experiments 1 and 2); (b) the pattern holds across both subject phrases and predicate phrases and across samples of both Child- and Adult-directed speech (Experiments 3, 4, and 7); and (c) both 9 month olds and adults show the sensitivity even when most phonetic information is removed by low-pass filtering (Experiments 5 and 6). Acoustic analyses suggest that pitch changes and in some cases durational changes are potential cues that infants might be using to make their discriminations. These findings are discussed with respect to their implications for theories of language acquisition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-Q |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85565056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ446653</ericid><els_id>001002859290009Q</els_id><sourcerecordid>3086908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkOp6Gr7DxSGVopeTJvvSW4EEdsqQivU65DNnNgss8k2mSnsv--Mu2xBsL0K5H3OmxMehI4J_kgwkZ8wJrjGVIkzTc81xljX96_QjGAtaiEpe41mO-QAHZayGBkqpdhH-0QoSho2QzffITtY9SHFKvnKujSUPrjKpZyhsz2U6XppFylXq5_ZFttVQwx9qebrap2G-FiF6G3syxu0521X4O32PEIPn69_XH2t7759ubm6vKudELqv5wIkVS0T0MwbcFwxqRT1TLRU2tZzqVtNtQeutW-0VMxL2mJBlMXYg23YEfqw6V3l9GuA0ptlKA66zkYYlzdKCCmwkP8FG6pZQ9TU-O4ZuEhDjuMnDCVMMkLV1Pb-JYiMRZzS5ulNvqFcTqVk8GaVw9LmtSHYTNbMpMRMSoym5smauR_HTrblw3wJ7d-hjaYxP93mtjjb-WyjC2WHCcI4pxN2vMEgB7dLr285H61P8cU2HvX8DpBNcQGigzZkcL1pU_j3mn8A3lC55g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1293422756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect: Social Science Backfile</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Jusczyk, Peter W ; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy ; Kemler Nelson, Deborah G ; Kennedy, Lori J ; Woodward, Amanda ; Piwoz, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Jusczyk, Peter W ; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy ; Kemler Nelson, Deborah G ; Kennedy, Lori J ; Woodward, Amanda ; Piwoz, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not 6 month olds, are attuned to cues that differentially mark speech that is artificially segmented at linguistically COINCIDENT as opposed to NONCOINCIDENT boundaries (Experiments 1 and 2); (b) the pattern holds across both subject phrases and predicate phrases and across samples of both Child- and Adult-directed speech (Experiments 3, 4, and 7); and (c) both 9 month olds and adults show the sensitivity even when most phonetic information is removed by low-pass filtering (Experiments 5 and 6). Acoustic analyses suggest that pitch changes and in some cases durational changes are potential cues that infants might be using to make their discriminations. These findings are discussed with respect to their implications for theories of language acquisition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-5623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-Q</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1582173</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGPSBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Correlates ; Age Differences ; Attention ; Auditory Perception ; Babies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child Development ; Child Language ; College Students ; Communication disorders ; Developmental psychology ; English ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Higher Education ; Humans ; Infant ; Infants ; Language ; Language Acquisition ; Language Development ; Linguistics ; Male ; Parsing ; Perceptions ; Phonetics ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Segmentation Skills ; Social research ; Sound Spectrography ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Perception ; Verbal Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Cognitive psychology, 1992-04, Vol.24 (2), p.252-293</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Apr 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001002859290009Q$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3645,27911,27912,30986,31257,46018</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ446653$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5134423$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1582173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jusczyk, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemler Nelson, Deborah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Lori J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piwoz, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants</title><title>Cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Cogn Psychol</addtitle><description>How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not 6 month olds, are attuned to cues that differentially mark speech that is artificially segmented at linguistically COINCIDENT as opposed to NONCOINCIDENT boundaries (Experiments 1 and 2); (b) the pattern holds across both subject phrases and predicate phrases and across samples of both Child- and Adult-directed speech (Experiments 3, 4, and 7); and (c) both 9 month olds and adults show the sensitivity even when most phonetic information is removed by low-pass filtering (Experiments 5 and 6). Acoustic analyses suggest that pitch changes and in some cases durational changes are potential cues that infants might be using to make their discriminations. These findings are discussed with respect to their implications for theories of language acquisition.</description><subject>Acoustic Correlates</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Parsing</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Segmentation Skills</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Verbal Stimuli</subject><issn>0010-0285</issn><issn>1095-5623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkOp6Gr7DxSGVopeTJvvSW4EEdsqQivU65DNnNgss8k2mSnsv--Mu2xBsL0K5H3OmxMehI4J_kgwkZ8wJrjGVIkzTc81xljX96_QjGAtaiEpe41mO-QAHZayGBkqpdhH-0QoSho2QzffITtY9SHFKvnKujSUPrjKpZyhsz2U6XppFylXq5_ZFttVQwx9qebrap2G-FiF6G3syxu0521X4O32PEIPn69_XH2t7759ubm6vKudELqv5wIkVS0T0MwbcFwxqRT1TLRU2tZzqVtNtQeutW-0VMxL2mJBlMXYg23YEfqw6V3l9GuA0ptlKA66zkYYlzdKCCmwkP8FG6pZQ9TU-O4ZuEhDjuMnDCVMMkLV1Pb-JYiMRZzS5ulNvqFcTqVk8GaVw9LmtSHYTNbMpMRMSoym5smauR_HTrblw3wJ7d-hjaYxP93mtjjb-WyjC2WHCcI4pxN2vMEgB7dLr285H61P8cU2HvX8DpBNcQGigzZkcL1pU_j3mn8A3lC55g</recordid><startdate>19920401</startdate><enddate>19920401</enddate><creator>Jusczyk, Peter W</creator><creator>Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy</creator><creator>Kemler Nelson, Deborah G</creator><creator>Kennedy, Lori J</creator><creator>Woodward, Amanda</creator><creator>Piwoz, Julie</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SDSKB</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920401</creationdate><title>Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants</title><author>Jusczyk, Peter W ; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy ; Kemler Nelson, Deborah G ; Kennedy, Lori J ; Woodward, Amanda ; Piwoz, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Correlates</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Parsing</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Segmentation Skills</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Verbal Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jusczyk, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemler Nelson, Deborah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Lori J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piwoz, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 43</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jusczyk, Peter W</au><au>Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy</au><au>Kemler Nelson, Deborah G</au><au>Kennedy, Lori J</au><au>Woodward, Amanda</au><au>Piwoz, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ446653</ericid><atitle>Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Psychol</addtitle><date>1992-04-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>252</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>252-293</pages><issn>0010-0285</issn><eissn>1095-5623</eissn><coden>CGPSBQ</coden><abstract>How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not 6 month olds, are attuned to cues that differentially mark speech that is artificially segmented at linguistically COINCIDENT as opposed to NONCOINCIDENT boundaries (Experiments 1 and 2); (b) the pattern holds across both subject phrases and predicate phrases and across samples of both Child- and Adult-directed speech (Experiments 3, 4, and 7); and (c) both 9 month olds and adults show the sensitivity even when most phonetic information is removed by low-pass filtering (Experiments 5 and 6). Acoustic analyses suggest that pitch changes and in some cases durational changes are potential cues that infants might be using to make their discriminations. These findings are discussed with respect to their implications for theories of language acquisition.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>1582173</pmid><doi>10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-Q</doi><tpages>42</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-0285 |
ispartof | Cognitive psychology, 1992-04, Vol.24 (2), p.252-293 |
issn | 0010-0285 1095-5623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85565056 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect: Social Science Backfile; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Acoustic Correlates Age Differences Attention Auditory Perception Babies Biological and medical sciences Child Development Child Language College Students Communication disorders Developmental psychology English Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Higher Education Humans Infant Infants Language Language Acquisition Language Development Linguistics Male Parsing Perceptions Phonetics Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Segmentation Skills Social research Sound Spectrography Speech Speech Acoustics Speech Perception Verbal Stimuli |
title | Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A12%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20of%20acoustic%20correlates%20of%20major%20phrasal%20units%20by%20young%20infants&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Jusczyk,%20Peter%20W&rft.date=1992-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=252&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=252-293&rft.issn=0010-0285&rft.eissn=1095-5623&rft.coden=CGPSBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-Q&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3086908%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1293422756&rft_id=info:pmid/1582173&rft_ericid=EJ446653&rfr_iscdi=true |