Loading…

Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants

How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognitive psychology 1992-04, Vol.24 (2), p.252-293
Main Authors: Jusczyk, Peter W, Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Kemler Nelson, Deborah G, Kennedy, Lori J, Woodward, Amanda, Piwoz, Julie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73
container_end_page 293
container_issue 2
container_start_page 252
container_title Cognitive psychology
container_volume 24
creator Jusczyk, Peter W
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy
Kemler Nelson, Deborah G
Kennedy, Lori J
Woodward, Amanda
Piwoz, Julie
description How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not 6 month olds, are attuned to cues that differentially mark speech that is artificially segmented at linguistically COINCIDENT as opposed to NONCOINCIDENT boundaries (Experiments 1 and 2); (b) the pattern holds across both subject phrases and predicate phrases and across samples of both Child- and Adult-directed speech (Experiments 3, 4, and 7); and (c) both 9 month olds and adults show the sensitivity even when most phonetic information is removed by low-pass filtering (Experiments 5 and 6). Acoustic analyses suggest that pitch changes and in some cases durational changes are potential cues that infants might be using to make their discriminations. These findings are discussed with respect to their implications for theories of language acquisition.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-Q
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85565056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ446653</ericid><els_id>001002859290009Q</els_id><sourcerecordid>3086908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkOp6Gr7DxSGVopeTJvvSW4EEdsqQivU65DNnNgss8k2mSnsv--Mu2xBsL0K5H3OmxMehI4J_kgwkZ8wJrjGVIkzTc81xljX96_QjGAtaiEpe41mO-QAHZayGBkqpdhH-0QoSho2QzffITtY9SHFKvnKujSUPrjKpZyhsz2U6XppFylXq5_ZFttVQwx9qebrap2G-FiF6G3syxu0521X4O32PEIPn69_XH2t7759ubm6vKudELqv5wIkVS0T0MwbcFwxqRT1TLRU2tZzqVtNtQeutW-0VMxL2mJBlMXYg23YEfqw6V3l9GuA0ptlKA66zkYYlzdKCCmwkP8FG6pZQ9TU-O4ZuEhDjuMnDCVMMkLV1Pb-JYiMRZzS5ulNvqFcTqVk8GaVw9LmtSHYTNbMpMRMSoym5smauR_HTrblw3wJ7d-hjaYxP93mtjjb-WyjC2WHCcI4pxN2vMEgB7dLr285H61P8cU2HvX8DpBNcQGigzZkcL1pU_j3mn8A3lC55g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1293422756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect: Social Science Backfile</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Jusczyk, Peter W ; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy ; Kemler Nelson, Deborah G ; Kennedy, Lori J ; Woodward, Amanda ; Piwoz, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Jusczyk, Peter W ; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy ; Kemler Nelson, Deborah G ; Kennedy, Lori J ; Woodward, Amanda ; Piwoz, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not 6 month olds, are attuned to cues that differentially mark speech that is artificially segmented at linguistically COINCIDENT as opposed to NONCOINCIDENT boundaries (Experiments 1 and 2); (b) the pattern holds across both subject phrases and predicate phrases and across samples of both Child- and Adult-directed speech (Experiments 3, 4, and 7); and (c) both 9 month olds and adults show the sensitivity even when most phonetic information is removed by low-pass filtering (Experiments 5 and 6). Acoustic analyses suggest that pitch changes and in some cases durational changes are potential cues that infants might be using to make their discriminations. These findings are discussed with respect to their implications for theories of language acquisition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-5623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-Q</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1582173</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGPSBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Correlates ; Age Differences ; Attention ; Auditory Perception ; Babies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child Development ; Child Language ; College Students ; Communication disorders ; Developmental psychology ; English ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Higher Education ; Humans ; Infant ; Infants ; Language ; Language Acquisition ; Language Development ; Linguistics ; Male ; Parsing ; Perceptions ; Phonetics ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Segmentation Skills ; Social research ; Sound Spectrography ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Perception ; Verbal Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Cognitive psychology, 1992-04, Vol.24 (2), p.252-293</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Apr 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001002859290009Q$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3645,27911,27912,30986,31257,46018</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ446653$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5134423$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1582173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jusczyk, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemler Nelson, Deborah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Lori J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piwoz, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants</title><title>Cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Cogn Psychol</addtitle><description>How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not 6 month olds, are attuned to cues that differentially mark speech that is artificially segmented at linguistically COINCIDENT as opposed to NONCOINCIDENT boundaries (Experiments 1 and 2); (b) the pattern holds across both subject phrases and predicate phrases and across samples of both Child- and Adult-directed speech (Experiments 3, 4, and 7); and (c) both 9 month olds and adults show the sensitivity even when most phonetic information is removed by low-pass filtering (Experiments 5 and 6). Acoustic analyses suggest that pitch changes and in some cases durational changes are potential cues that infants might be using to make their discriminations. These findings are discussed with respect to their implications for theories of language acquisition.</description><subject>Acoustic Correlates</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Parsing</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Segmentation Skills</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Verbal Stimuli</subject><issn>0010-0285</issn><issn>1095-5623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkOp6Gr7DxSGVopeTJvvSW4EEdsqQivU65DNnNgss8k2mSnsv--Mu2xBsL0K5H3OmxMehI4J_kgwkZ8wJrjGVIkzTc81xljX96_QjGAtaiEpe41mO-QAHZayGBkqpdhH-0QoSho2QzffITtY9SHFKvnKujSUPrjKpZyhsz2U6XppFylXq5_ZFttVQwx9qebrap2G-FiF6G3syxu0521X4O32PEIPn69_XH2t7759ubm6vKudELqv5wIkVS0T0MwbcFwxqRT1TLRU2tZzqVtNtQeutW-0VMxL2mJBlMXYg23YEfqw6V3l9GuA0ptlKA66zkYYlzdKCCmwkP8FG6pZQ9TU-O4ZuEhDjuMnDCVMMkLV1Pb-JYiMRZzS5ulNvqFcTqVk8GaVw9LmtSHYTNbMpMRMSoym5smauR_HTrblw3wJ7d-hjaYxP93mtjjb-WyjC2WHCcI4pxN2vMEgB7dLr285H61P8cU2HvX8DpBNcQGigzZkcL1pU_j3mn8A3lC55g</recordid><startdate>19920401</startdate><enddate>19920401</enddate><creator>Jusczyk, Peter W</creator><creator>Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy</creator><creator>Kemler Nelson, Deborah G</creator><creator>Kennedy, Lori J</creator><creator>Woodward, Amanda</creator><creator>Piwoz, Julie</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SDSKB</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920401</creationdate><title>Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants</title><author>Jusczyk, Peter W ; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy ; Kemler Nelson, Deborah G ; Kennedy, Lori J ; Woodward, Amanda ; Piwoz, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Correlates</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Parsing</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Segmentation Skills</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Verbal Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jusczyk, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemler Nelson, Deborah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Lori J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piwoz, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 43</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jusczyk, Peter W</au><au>Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy</au><au>Kemler Nelson, Deborah G</au><au>Kennedy, Lori J</au><au>Woodward, Amanda</au><au>Piwoz, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ446653</ericid><atitle>Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Psychol</addtitle><date>1992-04-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>252</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>252-293</pages><issn>0010-0285</issn><eissn>1095-5623</eissn><coden>CGPSBQ</coden><abstract>How might young learners parse speech into linguistically relevant units? Sensitivity to prosodic markers of these segments is one possibility. Seven experiments examined infants' sensitivity to acoustic correlates of phrasal units in English. The results suggest that: (a) 9 month olds, but not 6 month olds, are attuned to cues that differentially mark speech that is artificially segmented at linguistically COINCIDENT as opposed to NONCOINCIDENT boundaries (Experiments 1 and 2); (b) the pattern holds across both subject phrases and predicate phrases and across samples of both Child- and Adult-directed speech (Experiments 3, 4, and 7); and (c) both 9 month olds and adults show the sensitivity even when most phonetic information is removed by low-pass filtering (Experiments 5 and 6). Acoustic analyses suggest that pitch changes and in some cases durational changes are potential cues that infants might be using to make their discriminations. These findings are discussed with respect to their implications for theories of language acquisition.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>1582173</pmid><doi>10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-Q</doi><tpages>42</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-0285
ispartof Cognitive psychology, 1992-04, Vol.24 (2), p.252-293
issn 0010-0285
1095-5623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85565056
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect: Social Science Backfile; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Acoustic Correlates
Age Differences
Attention
Auditory Perception
Babies
Biological and medical sciences
Child Development
Child Language
College Students
Communication disorders
Developmental psychology
English
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Higher Education
Humans
Infant
Infants
Language
Language Acquisition
Language Development
Linguistics
Male
Parsing
Perceptions
Phonetics
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Segmentation Skills
Social research
Sound Spectrography
Speech
Speech Acoustics
Speech Perception
Verbal Stimuli
title Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A12%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20of%20acoustic%20correlates%20of%20major%20phrasal%20units%20by%20young%20infants&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Jusczyk,%20Peter%20W&rft.date=1992-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=252&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=252-293&rft.issn=0010-0285&rft.eissn=1095-5623&rft.coden=CGPSBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-Q&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3086908%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b5e628d35e7b7ec4836882f35d26adf469d929fe499f79683f62d0518a00fea73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1293422756&rft_id=info:pmid/1582173&rft_ericid=EJ446653&rfr_iscdi=true