Loading…
Systems-Analysis Assessment of the Effectiveness of Measures for Decreasing the Proliferation Risk of Fissioning Materials
Approaches to nonproliferation analysis from the standpoint of the potential dange of fissioning materials are demonstrated for two problems: the proliferation risk in a long-time global strategy for growth of nuclear fuel cycle and the choice of an efficient strategy for the utilization of weapons...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2001-11, Vol.91 (5), p.896-905 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 905 |
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 896 |
| container_title | Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.) |
| container_volume | 91 |
| creator | Poplavskii, V M Usanov, VI Chebeskov, AN Korobeinikov, V V Tikhomirov, B B Yugai, S V |
| description | Approaches to nonproliferation analysis from the standpoint of the potential dange of fissioning materials are demonstrated for two problems: the proliferation risk in a long-time global strategy for growth of nuclear fuel cycle and the choice of an efficient strategy for the utilization of weapons and power plutonium in Russia. Comparing open and closed nuclear cycles with multiple recycling of plutonium in fast reactors according to the criterion of potential proliferation risk ("exposure risk") shows that the present methodological approach does not confirm the idea that proliferation is of a greater danger in a closed cycle, which has become the foundation for long-time nuclear policy of the US. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1014209722470 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855680522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>855680522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p177t-686aa42926ad3da04d705f341c8942428a7663b56027a5143e585b22a15472f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EEqUws0YssATO3w5bVVpAagXiY67c1AGXNCk-B6n89bjAxMD07t397g2PkGMK5xQYvxhcUqCCQaEZExp2SI9KzXPDQO6mGRTPBZNmnxwgLgGgUIXpkc_HDUa3wnzQ2HqDHrMBokNcuSZmbZXFV5eNqsqV0X-4Jh22y6mz2AWHWdWG7MqVIXnfvHzD96GtfeWCjb5tsgePb9uPsUdMfgtNbXTB2xoPyV6VxB39ap88j0dPw5t8cnd9OxxM8jXVOubKKGsFK5iyC76wIBYaZMUFLU0hmGDGaqX4XCpg2koquJNGzhmzVArNKs775PQndx3a985hnK08lq6ubePaDmdGSmVAMpbIs39JqiH1KAqqE3ryB122XUgd4kxLY4CDVPwLIvJ6cg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>758803056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systems-Analysis Assessment of the Effectiveness of Measures for Decreasing the Proliferation Risk of Fissioning Materials</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Poplavskii, V M ; Usanov, VI ; Chebeskov, AN ; Korobeinikov, V V ; Tikhomirov, B B ; Yugai, S V</creator><creatorcontrib>Poplavskii, V M ; Usanov, VI ; Chebeskov, AN ; Korobeinikov, V V ; Tikhomirov, B B ; Yugai, S V</creatorcontrib><description>Approaches to nonproliferation analysis from the standpoint of the potential dange of fissioning materials are demonstrated for two problems: the proliferation risk in a long-time global strategy for growth of nuclear fuel cycle and the choice of an efficient strategy for the utilization of weapons and power plutonium in Russia. Comparing open and closed nuclear cycles with multiple recycling of plutonium in fast reactors according to the criterion of potential proliferation risk ("exposure risk") shows that the present methodological approach does not confirm the idea that proliferation is of a greater danger in a closed cycle, which has become the foundation for long-time nuclear policy of the US.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-4258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1014209722470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Criteria ; Materials selection ; Nuclear fuels ; Nuclear power generation ; Nuclear reactor components ; Nuclear weapons ; Plutonium ; Policies ; Risk ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.), 2001-11, Vol.91 (5), p.896-905</ispartof><rights>Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/758803056/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/758803056?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poplavskii, V M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usanov, VI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chebeskov, AN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korobeinikov, V V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhomirov, B B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yugai, S V</creatorcontrib><title>Systems-Analysis Assessment of the Effectiveness of Measures for Decreasing the Proliferation Risk of Fissioning Materials</title><title>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Approaches to nonproliferation analysis from the standpoint of the potential dange of fissioning materials are demonstrated for two problems: the proliferation risk in a long-time global strategy for growth of nuclear fuel cycle and the choice of an efficient strategy for the utilization of weapons and power plutonium in Russia. Comparing open and closed nuclear cycles with multiple recycling of plutonium in fast reactors according to the criterion of potential proliferation risk ("exposure risk") shows that the present methodological approach does not confirm the idea that proliferation is of a greater danger in a closed cycle, which has become the foundation for long-time nuclear policy of the US.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Nuclear power generation</subject><subject>Nuclear reactor components</subject><subject>Nuclear weapons</subject><subject>Plutonium</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>1063-4258</issn><issn>1573-8205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EEqUws0YssATO3w5bVVpAagXiY67c1AGXNCk-B6n89bjAxMD07t397g2PkGMK5xQYvxhcUqCCQaEZExp2SI9KzXPDQO6mGRTPBZNmnxwgLgGgUIXpkc_HDUa3wnzQ2HqDHrMBokNcuSZmbZXFV5eNqsqV0X-4Jh22y6mz2AWHWdWG7MqVIXnfvHzD96GtfeWCjb5tsgePb9uPsUdMfgtNbXTB2xoPyV6VxB39ap88j0dPw5t8cnd9OxxM8jXVOubKKGsFK5iyC76wIBYaZMUFLU0hmGDGaqX4XCpg2koquJNGzhmzVArNKs775PQndx3a985hnK08lq6ubePaDmdGSmVAMpbIs39JqiH1KAqqE3ryB122XUgd4kxLY4CDVPwLIvJ6cg</recordid><startdate>20011101</startdate><enddate>20011101</enddate><creator>Poplavskii, V M</creator><creator>Usanov, VI</creator><creator>Chebeskov, AN</creator><creator>Korobeinikov, V V</creator><creator>Tikhomirov, B B</creator><creator>Yugai, S V</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011101</creationdate><title>Systems-Analysis Assessment of the Effectiveness of Measures for Decreasing the Proliferation Risk of Fissioning Materials</title><author>Poplavskii, V M ; Usanov, VI ; Chebeskov, AN ; Korobeinikov, V V ; Tikhomirov, B B ; Yugai, S V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p177t-686aa42926ad3da04d705f341c8942428a7663b56027a5143e585b22a15472f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Nuclear power generation</topic><topic>Nuclear reactor components</topic><topic>Nuclear weapons</topic><topic>Plutonium</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poplavskii, V M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usanov, VI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chebeskov, AN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korobeinikov, V V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhomirov, B B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yugai, S V</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poplavskii, V M</au><au>Usanov, VI</au><au>Chebeskov, AN</au><au>Korobeinikov, V V</au><au>Tikhomirov, B B</au><au>Yugai, S V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systems-Analysis Assessment of the Effectiveness of Measures for Decreasing the Proliferation Risk of Fissioning Materials</atitle><jtitle>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2001-11-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>896</spage><epage>905</epage><pages>896-905</pages><issn>1063-4258</issn><eissn>1573-8205</eissn><abstract>Approaches to nonproliferation analysis from the standpoint of the potential dange of fissioning materials are demonstrated for two problems: the proliferation risk in a long-time global strategy for growth of nuclear fuel cycle and the choice of an efficient strategy for the utilization of weapons and power plutonium in Russia. Comparing open and closed nuclear cycles with multiple recycling of plutonium in fast reactors according to the criterion of potential proliferation risk ("exposure risk") shows that the present methodological approach does not confirm the idea that proliferation is of a greater danger in a closed cycle, which has become the foundation for long-time nuclear policy of the US.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1014209722470</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1063-4258 |
| ispartof | Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.), 2001-11, Vol.91 (5), p.896-905 |
| issn | 1063-4258 1573-8205 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855680522 |
| source | Springer Nature; ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global |
| subjects | Assessments Criteria Materials selection Nuclear fuels Nuclear power generation Nuclear reactor components Nuclear weapons Plutonium Policies Risk Strategy |
| title | Systems-Analysis Assessment of the Effectiveness of Measures for Decreasing the Proliferation Risk of Fissioning Materials |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A15%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systems-Analysis%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Effectiveness%20of%20Measures%20for%20Decreasing%20the%20Proliferation%20Risk%20of%20Fissioning%20Materials&rft.jtitle=Atomic%20energy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Poplavskii,%20V%20M&rft.date=2001-11-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=896&rft.epage=905&rft.pages=896-905&rft.issn=1063-4258&rft.eissn=1573-8205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1014209722470&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E855680522%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p177t-686aa42926ad3da04d705f341c8942428a7663b56027a5143e585b22a15472f33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=758803056&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |