Loading…

Predicting Response to Early Reading Intervention From Verbal IQ, Reading-Related Language Abilities, Attention Ratings, and Verbal IQ—Word Reading Discrepancy: Failure to Validate Discrepancy Method

Additional analyses of a previously published study addressed three questions about growth in word reading during early reading intervention: (1) How well do Verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities (phonological, rapid naming, and orthographic), and attention ratings predict reading growth? (2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of learning disabilities 2003-01, Vol.36 (1), p.24-33
Main Authors: Stage, Scott A., Abbott, Robert D., Jenkins, Joseph R., Berninger, Virginia W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-46e0598919415479a40290466067bfd3f2d0b7369abee1a8e71bade06b445a013
container_end_page 33
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Journal of learning disabilities
container_volume 36
creator Stage, Scott A.
Abbott, Robert D.
Jenkins, Joseph R.
Berninger, Virginia W.
description Additional analyses of a previously published study addressed three questions about growth in word reading during early reading intervention: (1) How well do Verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities (phonological, rapid naming, and orthographic), and attention ratings predict reading growth? (2) How well do language deficits predict reading growth? and (3) How well does Verbal IQ—word reading discrepancy predict reading growth? Univariate analyses showed that Verbal IQ, phonological skills, orthographic skills, rapid automatized naming (RAN), and attention ratings predicted the response to early intervention, but multivariate analyses based on a combination of predictors for real-word reading and pseudoword reading showed that Verbal IQ was not the best unique predictor. Students with double or triple deficits in language skills (RAN, phonological, and orthographic processing) responded more slowly to early intervention than students without language deficits. Verbal IQ—word reading discrepancy did not predict the response to early intervention in reading. Overall results supported the use of reading-related language and attention measures rather than IQ—achievement discrepancy in identifying candidates for early reading intervention.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00222194030360010401
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85569064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ660990</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_00222194030360010401</sage_id><sourcerecordid>71594310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-46e0598919415479a40290466067bfd3f2d0b7369abee1a8e71bade06b445a013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1uEzEQxy0EoqHwBhWyOHDqwnjX9trHqKQQFKkQ8XFceXcnkauNN7W9SLnxELwAr9YnqVdJW4QQPVma-c3H3_Mn5ITBG8bK8i1AnudMcyigkAAMOLBHZMJEoTJeKnhMJiOSjcwReRbCJQDwvJRPyRETXINSekJ-f_LY2iZat6ZLDNveBaSxpzPju12KmHbMzF1E_wNdtL2j577f0G_oa9PR-efTWyhbYmcitnRh3Howa6TT2nY2WgyndBrjoXppxlkpZFx73-X656_vvW_vBr6zofG4Na7ZPSdPVqYL-OLwHpOv57MvZx-yxcX7-dl0kTUceMy4RBBa6aQ2qSu14ZBr4FKCLOtVW6zyFuqykNrUiMwoLFltWgRZcy4MsOKYvN733fr-asAQq01aArvOOOyHUCkhpAbJHwRLJjQvGDwIinQlrYoiga_-Ai_7wbuktkpy8lwqJRLE91Dj-xA8rqqttxvjdxWDanRE9S9HpLKXh95DvcH2vuhggQSc7AH0trlLzz6mn9N6FMH26ZBO-sde_5t5Ax7hx6E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194226885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Response to Early Reading Intervention From Verbal IQ, Reading-Related Language Abilities, Attention Ratings, and Verbal IQ—Word Reading Discrepancy: Failure to Validate Discrepancy Method</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>MLA International Bibliography with Full Text</source><source>Education Collection</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>Stage, Scott A. ; Abbott, Robert D. ; Jenkins, Joseph R. ; Berninger, Virginia W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stage, Scott A. ; Abbott, Robert D. ; Jenkins, Joseph R. ; Berninger, Virginia W.</creatorcontrib><description>Additional analyses of a previously published study addressed three questions about growth in word reading during early reading intervention: (1) How well do Verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities (phonological, rapid naming, and orthographic), and attention ratings predict reading growth? (2) How well do language deficits predict reading growth? and (3) How well does Verbal IQ—word reading discrepancy predict reading growth? Univariate analyses showed that Verbal IQ, phonological skills, orthographic skills, rapid automatized naming (RAN), and attention ratings predicted the response to early intervention, but multivariate analyses based on a combination of predictors for real-word reading and pseudoword reading showed that Verbal IQ was not the best unique predictor. Students with double or triple deficits in language skills (RAN, phonological, and orthographic processing) responded more slowly to early intervention than students without language deficits. Verbal IQ—word reading discrepancy did not predict the response to early intervention in reading. Overall results supported the use of reading-related language and attention measures rather than IQ—achievement discrepancy in identifying candidates for early reading intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00222194030360010401</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15490889</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLDIAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Attention ; Attention Deficit Disorders ; Candidates ; Child ; Child Health ; Child Language ; Decision making ; Discrepancies ; Discrepancy Formulas ; Discrepancy Measure ; Dyslexia - prevention &amp; control ; Early Intervention ; Early intervention programmes ; Early literacy ; Early Reading ; Elementary Education ; Female ; Grade 1 ; Grapheme phoneme correspondence ; Humans ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Intelligence ; Intelligence Quotient ; Intelligence tests ; Intervention ; Language Impairments ; Language proficiency ; Language Skills ; Language testing ; Learning disabilities ; Male ; Naming ; Orthographic processing ; Phonetics ; Phonological processing ; Phonology ; Predictor Variables ; Prospective Studies ; Reading ; Reading achievement ; Reading Difficulties ; Reading disabilities ; Reading Instruction ; Reading Tests ; Remedial Teaching - methods ; Special education ; Verbal Ability ; Verbal Behavior ; Vocabulary ; Vocabulary Development</subject><ispartof>Journal of learning disabilities, 2003-01, Vol.36 (1), p.24-33</ispartof><rights>Copyright PRO-ED Journals Jan/Feb 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-46e0598919415479a40290466067bfd3f2d0b7369abee1a8e71bade06b445a013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/194226885/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/194226885?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,12825,12840,21357,21373,21374,27900,27901,27902,30976,30977,31247,33588,33589,33854,33855,34507,34508,34752,34753,43709,43856,44091,44176,62634,62635,62637,62650,73939,73964,74140,74382,74471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ660990$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15490889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stage, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berninger, Virginia W.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Response to Early Reading Intervention From Verbal IQ, Reading-Related Language Abilities, Attention Ratings, and Verbal IQ—Word Reading Discrepancy: Failure to Validate Discrepancy Method</title><title>Journal of learning disabilities</title><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><description>Additional analyses of a previously published study addressed three questions about growth in word reading during early reading intervention: (1) How well do Verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities (phonological, rapid naming, and orthographic), and attention ratings predict reading growth? (2) How well do language deficits predict reading growth? and (3) How well does Verbal IQ—word reading discrepancy predict reading growth? Univariate analyses showed that Verbal IQ, phonological skills, orthographic skills, rapid automatized naming (RAN), and attention ratings predicted the response to early intervention, but multivariate analyses based on a combination of predictors for real-word reading and pseudoword reading showed that Verbal IQ was not the best unique predictor. Students with double or triple deficits in language skills (RAN, phonological, and orthographic processing) responded more slowly to early intervention than students without language deficits. Verbal IQ—word reading discrepancy did not predict the response to early intervention in reading. Overall results supported the use of reading-related language and attention measures rather than IQ—achievement discrepancy in identifying candidates for early reading intervention.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorders</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Health</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Discrepancy Formulas</subject><subject>Discrepancy Measure</subject><subject>Dyslexia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Early Intervention</subject><subject>Early intervention programmes</subject><subject>Early literacy</subject><subject>Early Reading</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Grapheme phoneme correspondence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligence Quotient</subject><subject>Intelligence tests</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Language proficiency</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Language testing</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Naming</subject><subject>Orthographic processing</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonological processing</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading achievement</subject><subject>Reading Difficulties</subject><subject>Reading disabilities</subject><subject>Reading Instruction</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Remedial Teaching - methods</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Verbal Ability</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><issn>0022-2194</issn><issn>1538-4780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1uEzEQxy0EoqHwBhWyOHDqwnjX9trHqKQQFKkQ8XFceXcnkauNN7W9SLnxELwAr9YnqVdJW4QQPVma-c3H3_Mn5ITBG8bK8i1AnudMcyigkAAMOLBHZMJEoTJeKnhMJiOSjcwReRbCJQDwvJRPyRETXINSekJ-f_LY2iZat6ZLDNveBaSxpzPju12KmHbMzF1E_wNdtL2j577f0G_oa9PR-efTWyhbYmcitnRh3Howa6TT2nY2WgyndBrjoXppxlkpZFx73-X656_vvW_vBr6zofG4Na7ZPSdPVqYL-OLwHpOv57MvZx-yxcX7-dl0kTUceMy4RBBa6aQ2qSu14ZBr4FKCLOtVW6zyFuqykNrUiMwoLFltWgRZcy4MsOKYvN733fr-asAQq01aArvOOOyHUCkhpAbJHwRLJjQvGDwIinQlrYoiga_-Ai_7wbuktkpy8lwqJRLE91Dj-xA8rqqttxvjdxWDanRE9S9HpLKXh95DvcH2vuhggQSc7AH0trlLzz6mn9N6FMH26ZBO-sde_5t5Ax7hx6E</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Stage, Scott A.</creator><creator>Abbott, Robert D.</creator><creator>Jenkins, Joseph R.</creator><creator>Berninger, Virginia W.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>Predicting Response to Early Reading Intervention From Verbal IQ, Reading-Related Language Abilities, Attention Ratings, and Verbal IQ—Word Reading Discrepancy</title><author>Stage, Scott A. ; Abbott, Robert D. ; Jenkins, Joseph R. ; Berninger, Virginia W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-46e0598919415479a40290466067bfd3f2d0b7369abee1a8e71bade06b445a013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorders</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Health</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Discrepancy Formulas</topic><topic>Discrepancy Measure</topic><topic>Dyslexia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Early Intervention</topic><topic>Early intervention programmes</topic><topic>Early literacy</topic><topic>Early Reading</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Grapheme phoneme correspondence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligence Quotient</topic><topic>Intelligence tests</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Language proficiency</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Language testing</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Naming</topic><topic>Orthographic processing</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonological processing</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading achievement</topic><topic>Reading Difficulties</topic><topic>Reading disabilities</topic><topic>Reading Instruction</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Remedial Teaching - methods</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Verbal Ability</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stage, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berninger, Virginia W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stage, Scott A.</au><au>Abbott, Robert D.</au><au>Jenkins, Joseph R.</au><au>Berninger, Virginia W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ660990</ericid><atitle>Predicting Response to Early Reading Intervention From Verbal IQ, Reading-Related Language Abilities, Attention Ratings, and Verbal IQ—Word Reading Discrepancy: Failure to Validate Discrepancy Method</atitle><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>24-33</pages><issn>0022-2194</issn><eissn>1538-4780</eissn><coden>JLDIAD</coden><abstract>Additional analyses of a previously published study addressed three questions about growth in word reading during early reading intervention: (1) How well do Verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities (phonological, rapid naming, and orthographic), and attention ratings predict reading growth? (2) How well do language deficits predict reading growth? and (3) How well does Verbal IQ—word reading discrepancy predict reading growth? Univariate analyses showed that Verbal IQ, phonological skills, orthographic skills, rapid automatized naming (RAN), and attention ratings predicted the response to early intervention, but multivariate analyses based on a combination of predictors for real-word reading and pseudoword reading showed that Verbal IQ was not the best unique predictor. Students with double or triple deficits in language skills (RAN, phonological, and orthographic processing) responded more slowly to early intervention than students without language deficits. Verbal IQ—word reading discrepancy did not predict the response to early intervention in reading. Overall results supported the use of reading-related language and attention measures rather than IQ—achievement discrepancy in identifying candidates for early reading intervention.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><pmid>15490889</pmid><doi>10.1177/00222194030360010401</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2194
ispartof Journal of learning disabilities, 2003-01, Vol.36 (1), p.24-33
issn 0022-2194
1538-4780
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85569064
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Sociology Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); MLA International Bibliography with Full Text; Education Collection; Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects Attention
Attention Deficit Disorders
Candidates
Child
Child Health
Child Language
Decision making
Discrepancies
Discrepancy Formulas
Discrepancy Measure
Dyslexia - prevention & control
Early Intervention
Early intervention programmes
Early literacy
Early Reading
Elementary Education
Female
Grade 1
Grapheme phoneme correspondence
Humans
Instructional Effectiveness
Intelligence
Intelligence Quotient
Intelligence tests
Intervention
Language Impairments
Language proficiency
Language Skills
Language testing
Learning disabilities
Male
Naming
Orthographic processing
Phonetics
Phonological processing
Phonology
Predictor Variables
Prospective Studies
Reading
Reading achievement
Reading Difficulties
Reading disabilities
Reading Instruction
Reading Tests
Remedial Teaching - methods
Special education
Verbal Ability
Verbal Behavior
Vocabulary
Vocabulary Development
title Predicting Response to Early Reading Intervention From Verbal IQ, Reading-Related Language Abilities, Attention Ratings, and Verbal IQ—Word Reading Discrepancy: Failure to Validate Discrepancy Method
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Response%20to%20Early%20Reading%20Intervention%20From%20Verbal%20IQ,%20Reading-Related%20Language%20Abilities,%20Attention%20Ratings,%20and%20Verbal%20IQ%E2%80%94Word%20Reading%20Discrepancy:%20Failure%20to%20Validate%20Discrepancy%20Method&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20learning%20disabilities&rft.au=Stage,%20Scott%20A.&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=24-33&rft.issn=0022-2194&rft.eissn=1538-4780&rft.coden=JLDIAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00222194030360010401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71594310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-46e0598919415479a40290466067bfd3f2d0b7369abee1a8e71bade06b445a013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194226885&rft_id=info:pmid/15490889&rft_ericid=EJ660990&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00222194030360010401&rfr_iscdi=true