Plans, Affordances, and Combinatory Grammar

The idea that natural language grammar and planned action are related systems has been implicit in psychological theory for more than a century. However, formal theories in the two domains have tended to look very different. This article argues that both faculties share the formal character of appli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistics and philosophy 2002-12, Vol.25 (5/6), p.723-753
Main Author: Steedman, Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Artificial intelligence
Children
Grammar
Knowledge
Language
Linguistic theory
Linguistics
Mathematical functions
Music composition
Musical grammar
Musical notation
Natural language
Ontology
Philosophy
Philosophy of language. Logic
Semantics
Sensory perception
Tense
Verbs
Word order
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The idea that natural language grammar and planned action are related systems has been implicit in psychological theory for more than a century. However, formal theories in the two domains have tended to look very different. This article argues that both faculties share the formal character of applicative systems based on operations corresponding to the same two combinatory operations, namely functional composition and type-raising. Viewing them in this way suggests simpler and more cognitively plausible accounts of both systems, and suggests that the language faculty evolved in the species and develops in children by a rather direct adaptation of a more primitive apparatus for planning purposive action in the world by composing affordances of objects or tools. The knowledge representation that underlies such planning is also reflected in the natural language semantics of tense, mood, and aspect, which the paper begins by arguing provides the key to understanding both systems.
ISSN:0165-0157
1573-0549
DOI:10.1023/a:1020820000972